Remove this Banner Ad

How many goals at minimum does a 'bag' constitute?

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

5 is a bag for me.

4 is a good game.

3 is a solid enough game.

2 is passable.

1 or less is poor.

7+ is a monstrous effort that only happens a handful of times a year.
 
I once kicked 4 goals in the first quarter back in U/10s as a ruckman. I considered that a bag due to the fact of the position and the amount of time I got it in (15mins quarters). Just thought I would share yet another awesomeness story from myself.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

It's 6,people who say 5 live in mediocrity:thumbsu:
 
5. 1 a quarter plus 1 extra. enough to say you beat your opponent, plus in most games these days 5 is almost enough to kick half your teams score.

"Bags" 7 plus are so rare these days maybe the OP can come up with a clever name for them.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I reckon its changed, back in the 90s or early 00s a bag would have to be 7 or more, maybe a 6 if it was a low scoring game, but these days I reckon you almost count 5 as a bag unfortunately
 
definitely 7+, shame there's not too many capable of kicking that many in a game these days.
No I disagree.

This is not an individual thing, it is almost completely down to the way the game is played.

Higher rotations, greater spreads of goal kickers to minimise predictability, less latitude with what forwards are allowed to do to out body opponents, more onus on defensive structures and specialised defenders, lower scoring opportunities due to zones and flooding.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom