How many weeks for Jarrad McVeigh's king hit against Will Langford ?

[Engimal]

Exactly.

 

[Messenger]

Exactly.

Looks higher than his chest.

 

[Kummerspeck]

Looks higher than his chest.

Looks around the shoulder. Maybe neck. Dunno why you're trying to prove it with a single, blurry freeze frame though.

Nah

. I can't be bothered following this comp. .

Jesus, Chewy. No one cares. Get a journal or something.

 

[Smedts_2]

Are these actual Hawthorn BigFooty accounts or Sydney troll parodies???

What the actual (#(#

 

[Smedts_2]

Why is Langford doing squats? Weird stance to take while playing footy...

 

[RegHickeyStand]

If Johnson didn't go for whacking McVeigh in the nads last round, Macca sure as hell didn't deserve anything fir this. Plus Langford got straight back up and kept playing. Below reportable threshold for sure.

Dunno about the MRP saying it was a tackle though, bit like Johnson " trying to gain position to win the ball" last week though.

Johnson has already explained that was an accident. I don't know why you brought that up. McVeigh and Mitchell should have got weeks, that's for sure.

 

[Sydney Bloods]

Johnson has already explained that was an accident. I don't know why you brought that up. McVeigh and Mitchell should have got weeks, that's for sure.

we're suspending guys for slightly late tackles now?
incidental high because langford ducked like a bitch.

far cry from punching a bloke in the duck.

 

[Demonic Ascent]

Cannot believe he got let off!!

Yet Yeo gets a week for an attempted spoil? And Daniher gets off with a fine for basically the same as what Yeo did???

Yep MRP Chook Lotto strikes again

 

[hawkman]

Contact between the Sydney Swans' Jarrad McVeigh andHawthorn's Will Langford from the first quarter of Saturday’s match was assessed. Langford has the ball and is preparing to handball to teammate Luke Breust as McVeigh approaches to tackle. As Langford disposes of the ball, McVeigh makes high contact to the Hawthorn player in his tackling motion. A free kick was not paid for the high contact to Langford at the time but it was the view of the panel that McVeigh’s action was a tackling motion and not a striking action. No further action was taken.

Have no problem with him getting off but they could at least be truthful in their statement. It wasn't as Langford was disposing the ball but well after he got rid of it

 

[Quinz]

Have no problem with him getting off but they could at least be truthful in their statement. It wasn't as Langford was disposing the ball but well after he got rid of it

It's interesting the same panel can consider that contact basically in time with the release of the handball, and Elliot Yeo's as carelessly after the mark by Webster.

 

[Kummerspeck]

Have no problem with him getting off but they could at least be truthful in their statement. It wasn't as Langford was disposing the ball but well after he got rid of it

As far as I could see from the replay, it was McVeigh hitting him that caused him to miss the attempt at a kick.