Ins

[Kane McGoodwin]

Originally posted by hotpie
Matthew Clarke is EXACTLY the type of ruckman we hope Richards develops in to, so it will be a great test.

You mean a ruckman who rarely takes a mark or does much around the ground...

Yeah, yeah, I know he's not bad when it comes to taps.

 

[FIGJAM]

Originally posted by Kane McGoodwin
You mean a ruckman who rarely takes a mark or does much around the ground...

Richards ain't bad around the ground. Makes good position and doesn't use it like a spaz (eg. J. Madden).

He'll get his mits on it more often with experience and courage!

 

[hotpie]

Originally posted by Kane McGoodwin
You mean a ruckman who rarely takes a mark or does much around the ground...

Yeah, yeah, I know he's not bad when it comes to taps.

Frankly I don't see Richards as much more than an old fashioned tap ruckman, in the Clarke/Everitt style. But if he can do it well for 8-10 years, with athlete Fraser backing him up and doing the marking and goalscoring etc, I'll be a very satisfied fan.

 

[hotpie]

Originally posted by Kane McGoodwin
. Hopefully you don't tag either Roo or Macca, as I reckon they could run riot IF Clarke gets his hands to the ball. Would be good to see a close, attacking game for a change.

We'll keep close tabs on Roo only.

 

[jefffff34]

Originally posted by shuveradda
Out: Davis.

Why the **** would you drop Davis?

He's one of the only ones that has tried this year.

 

[NICK THE PIE MAN]

Originally posted by Hoggy
Why the **** would you drop Davis?

He's one of the only ones that has tried this year.

So we can bring in Rhyce Shaw!

Following last week's "innovation", he was obviously brought in to be Carey's opponent!