- Mar 28, 2023
- 26,946
- 52,367
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
I've noticed Instagram aren't either and @footyonnine closed off comments...SEN not touching it this morning
That tells you all you need to know
it's very rare they turn off comments.Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I've noticed Instagram aren't either and @footyonnine closed off comments...SEN not touching it this morning
That tells you all you need to know
it's very rare they turn off comments.If we make the finals (should do btw) something else will croo up - this is Collingwood - some people are probably planning their September strike against us nowDusty is on video grabbing a stripper’s breast and nothing came of it. Hopefully this is treated the same. At least it came out now, and not a week before finals.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

Fake news - was that Crispy outside Trump Tower?Another round, another Collingwood scandal.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
That’s the key question is he mentally up to playing. The drug angle is inconsequential because every player gets around that. First instinct on the language toward the girls is he wouldn’t give a shit given his history and for all we know he’s in an open relationship. Basically I’m parking that one and the cards will fall as they do.Agreed, based on what we know so far, no football punishment. But I can definitely see the case for sending him along to a Respect course. The standard you walk past is the standard you accept. Now its in the public domain, I'm not sure we can let that language/attitude go by without action. Of course that's without knowing the other half of the conversation Jack was participating in and what he was responding to.
The other factor about tonight's game, will Jack even be mentally right to play? I imagine its been a tough 12 hours for him so far and assuming this is new information for his wife, there is every chance he's got way more on his mind than how to fulfil his role against Brisbane.
Also spot on about the profiteering aspect. The AFLPA needs to make a stand against the media reporting on or buying leaked/secretly recorded content of players where there is no genuine need for public interest.
Fake news - was that Crispy outside Trump Tower?
They've probably done that due to legal advice.I've noticed Instagram aren't either and @footyonnine closed off comments...it's very rare they turn off comments.
I think the board will act on it.
Hopefully just a fine… to remind older players of their accountability to their teammates and the club that they are paid very well to play for… and to make an example and keep the younger players in line
Jack says sorry. Pays the fine… which hopefully goes to a charity rather than the clowns at AFL House.
Do absolutely nothing and the club will be made a pariah for it by the usual suspects in the media and the narrative will be that it’s not a family friendly club, etc etc
And before anyone arcs up over Jack being fined… he only had himself to blame for sending nudes, etc
Should know better. Especially given how much of this type of controversy Collingwood has already had over the last several years.
No sympathy for him from me.
Exactly. I hope the person who has shared these pics without consent is identified & charged. As for the rest of it, it's so easy to add any text to a photo.They've probably done that due to legal advice.
Even if all those snapchat photos are legitimately from Crisp they were not shared publicly but sent privately to a contact or contacts. It's akin to someone stealing your photos from your partner's house and distributing them. They are private.
Media outlets will need to tread very carefully here as by sharing the images and describing them is a breach of privacy including the "revenge pr0n" laws.
You may recall that Dane Swan was a victim of this.
The Age and the Herald-Sun are certainly running with the story? Only the Herald-Sun have published the images, though. Will they be at risk for sharing the images?They've probably done that due to legal advice.
Even if all those snapchat photos are legitimately from Crisp they were not shared publicly but sent privately to a contact or contacts. It's akin to someone stealing your photos from your partner's house and distributing them. They are private.
Media outlets will need to tread very carefully here as by sharing the images and describing them is a breach of privacy including the "revenge pr0n" laws.
You may recall that Dane Swan was a victim of this.
How does the club have the right to sanction him if these photos were taken before he was at the club? I heard he talked in class when he was at school one day - better sanction him for that as well.
Hold on...was Chad Warner punished? I didn't even see that reported in the news? Were Riewoldt & the other Saint punished when nudes of them were shared without their consent? No, they weren't. It's not illegal to take nude photos of yourself. It is illegal to share them without consent.I think the board will act on it.
Hopefully just a fine… to remind older players of their accountability to their teammates and the club that they are paid very well to play for… and to make an example and keep the younger players in line
Jack says sorry. Pays the fine… which hopefully goes to a charity rather than the clowns at AFL House.
Do absolutely nothing and the club will be made a pariah for it by the usual suspects in the media and the narrative will be that it’s not a family friendly club, etc etc
And before anyone arcs up over Jack being fined… he only had himself to blame for sending nudes, etc
Should know better. Especially given how much of this type of controversy Collingwood has already had over the last several years.
No sympathy for him from me.
It's an interesting one.Nothing will happen, if anything, it's an invasion of privacy
I hope they're sued.The Age and the Herald-Sun are certainly running with the story? Only the Herald-Sun have published the images, though. Will they be at risk for sharing the images?
“We’re not quite sure but we’re lead to believe it’s historical, it’s from a number of years back,” McGuire said.
“The Collingwood Football Club will do its due diligence with the AFL to see whether it was historical, whether it was private and confidential and whether Jack Crisp is the victim here.”
Co-host Damian Barrett said the investigation would look at whether the video was consensually sent and received.
“And has somebody set him up now?” McGuire interjected.
‘Little sl**s I’ll tell you what to do’: Leaked Crisp video details emerge as ex-Pies boss responds
Potentially.The Age and the Herald-Sun are certainly running with the story? Only the Herald-Sun have published the images, though. Will they be at risk for sharing the images?
How does the club have the right to sanction him if these photos were taken before he was at the club? I heard he talked in class when he was at school one day - better sanction him for that as well.
I think it’s pretty likely they were taken while he was at Collingwood.
The question is what is he guilty of?
Talking dirty is not illegal or against the AFL’s rules.
Posting photos of unknown white powder on a table, ditto.
Posting nudes privately, ditto.
Bringing the game into disrepute? Tough to make a claim for that if someone posted a snapchat video recorded without his consent.
I follow Crispy’s insta and it’s one of the most wholesome AFL player pages out there. So this is completely out of character. Weird.
Smells like a stitch up. He has two young kids so hopefully this doesn’t unravel his relationship.
Footy players aren’t the sharpest tools in the shed, so could be legit. Hope not.
Yeah… like 4 weeks![]()
Considering they wouldn't move to protect a player from organized and premeditated assault I doubt they will make any move.Agreed, based on what we know so far, no football punishment. But I can definitely see the case for sending him along to a Respect course. The standard you walk past is the standard you accept. Now its in the public domain, I'm not sure we can let that language/attitude go by without action. Of course that's without knowing the other half of the conversation Jack was participating in and what he was responding to.
The other factor about tonight's game, will Jack even be mentally right to play? I imagine its been a tough 12 hours for him so far and assuming this is new information for his wife, there is every chance he's got way more on his mind than how to fulfil his role against Brisbane.
Also spot on about the profiteering aspect. The AFLPA needs to make a stand against the media reporting on or buying leaked/secretly recorded content of players where there is no genuine need for public interest.
Potentially.
That's all I can say because there are too many unknowns.
The HS always flies close to the sun and Murdoch has deep pockets.
Hold on...was Chad Warner punished? I didn't even see that reported in the news? Were Riewoldt & the other Saint punished when nudes of them were shared without their consent? No, they weren't. It's not illegal to take nude photos of yourself. It is illegal to share them without consent.