Jeremy Corbyn, former UK Opposition Leader

Remove this Banner Ad

You obviously haven't read the Chilcot Report then.

Clueless, so you are saying they got UN Security Council approval?
They dont have to get un approval.
The Chilcot report is mainly critical of internal macinations of the uk govt, it does not form an opinion on the legality of going to war.
The ICC has no law to prosecute him under.

The vibe, lefty conspiracy theories and hot air dont cut it.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I like the way Blair is rightly pilloried in the Murdoch press in the UK, while the equally complicit John Howard's s**t doesn't stink according to his mastheads here.

Oh FFS. Blair made numerous claims that Howard didnt eg 45 minutes, Niger uranium etc, sexed up dossier, David Kelly etc.

Absurd to compare Howard's efforts to that (and ASIS intelligence gathering ability to MI6)

Lets not forget Howard saved the Timorese from mass slaughter unlike that great stain on Australia, Whitlam who was utterly indifferent to their slaughter.
 
Lol. Its utter piffle, the sort of crap you wouldnt find outside of first years Arts. Hardly surprising given the author.


Martin Jacques

Martin Jacques is the former editor of Marxism Today.

Shoot the messenger as usual meds rather than provide a counter argument.
 
Corbyn, really? Cause if not, then not really relevant to the discussion. And you're hardly likely to get vigorous defence of Labour from me. Just the lesser of two evils usually.

Labour did previously. As for Corbyn the delusional chap he is thinks he should form a govt despite having far fewer seats than the Tories. He would need DUP votes to govern so by definition he is open to dealing with them.

Two possibilities. He either cant do the most simple of mathematical calculations (and given his record of utter failure at school that is a real possibiliity) or he is a rampant hypocrite.

Ok or third possibility, he is both.
 
Shoot the messenger as usual meds rather than provide a counter argument.

FFS the article is just nonsensical re neo liberalism. As if bailouts and QE are anything to do with neo liberalism.

The bloke has no clue on finance and economics.

As anyone with a clue knows the more deregulated US banking industry had far less issues than Europe.

Crap argument, easily dismissed.
 
FFS the article is just nonsensical re neo liberalism. As if bailouts and QE are anything to do with neo liberalism.

The bloke has no clue on finance and economics.

As anyone with a clue knows the more deregulated US banking industry had far less issues than Europe.

Crap argument, easily dismissed.

Astonishing, awe inspiring stupidity. QE and bailouts were only the symptoms of the problems arising from neo liberal ideology and deregulation, not the cause.
 
Armed forces day in the UK last saturday.

Corbyn who loves nothing more than hanging around with terror groups like Hamas, Hezbollah and the IRA neglected to attend and instead went to the £300 a pop Gladstonbury (with its fences to keep out the poor)

Even by his pathetically low standards a disgraceful effort.
 
Armed forces day in the UK last saturday.

Corbyn who loves nothing more than hanging around with terror groups like Hamas, Hezbollah and the IRA neglected to attend and instead went to the £300 a pop Gladstonbury (with its fences to keep out the poor)

Even by his pathetically low standards a disgraceful effort.
Got to convert those Sloane rangers somehow.
 
Got to convert those Sloane rangers somehow.

The dumb morons havent quite worked out that he will more than happily take all their inheritance.

Gain worthless degree for free
Lose multimillion house

The maths isnt hard.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Armed forces day in the UK last saturday.

Corbyn who loves nothing more than hanging around with terror groups like Hamas, Hezbollah and the IRA neglected to attend and instead went to the £300 a pop Gladstonbury (with its fences to keep out the poor)

Even by his pathetically low standards a disgraceful effort.
Sargon had something to say about it

 
Shoot the messenger as usual meds rather than provide a counter argument.
Do you know what the western world was like in the decades before liberalism took hold? There was a brief positive period during the rebuild years after the war but once that was complete things quickly turned ugly. Lives were being destroyed by simultaneous low growth and ridiculously high inflation by the 1970s. Farmers were throwing food into the rubbish bin because governments had regulated food prices below the cost of producing it. Cities were without power. Garbage collectors weren't collecting rubbish due to pay disputes. Plane travel was only for the rich because public sector monopolies resulted in ridiculously high prices. In fact the real cost of everything was high because of tariffs preventing trade and public monopolies. The developing world was cut off from trade markets by the west, became socialist in retaliation and diverged from the western world. China had the greatest famine in human history that was created by regulation, not drought. Latin America, previously consisting of well off middle income countries before the Second World War, became third world suffering from hyperinflation. India was also a basket case and we all know what was happening in South East Asia during the seventies and let's not even discuss Eastern Europe.

Give me neoliberalism any day of the week over the human tragedy that was that period. Does that mean there are no problems with neoliberalism? Ofcourse not. Getting money out of politics and removing corporate influence on the formation of the global order is completely necessary and the number one problem facing the world today. But that doesn't mean reverting back to the socialist states of the past.
 
Last edited:
Give me neoliberalism any day of the week over the human tragedy that was that period.

its just one big piss take. How anyone falls for such an obvious troll is beyond me. As if its actually possible to believe Chavez was anything other than an utterly useless campaigner.

 
Good, purge the rest of the Blairite filth while they're at it. They went about white anting Corbyn since he was elected leader in 2015. Berger walked out of the shadow cabinet. She made her bed. No sympathy whasoever for her. Corbyn's way or the highway now I'm afraid.

And trust Meds to bring a racial element into it. Absolute peanut.
 
And trust Meds to bring a racial element into it. Absolute peanut.

Usual ignorance from you.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/oct/16/jeremy-corbyn-antisemitism-chakrabarti-inquiry

Jeremy Corbyn has come under strong personal attack from a cross-party committee of MPs investigating the growth of antisemitism for helping to create a safe space for people with “vile attitudes towards Jewish people”.

The MPs criticise Chakrabarti for describing antisemitic abuse as merely “unhappy incidents”
 
Usual ignorance from you.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/oct/16/jeremy-corbyn-antisemitism-chakrabarti-inquiry

Jeremy Corbyn has come under strong personal attack from a cross-party committee of MPs investigating the growth of antisemitism for helping to create a safe space for people with “vile attitudes towards Jewish people”.

The MPs criticise Chakrabarti for describing antisemitic abuse as merely “unhappy incidents”

Again as has been pointed out to you more times than can be counted you actually have to show some evidence of Corbyn being anti semitic (not that you give a flying * about facts or evidence).

Being critical of Israel doesnt make you anti semitic. Your own stupid article states that he ordered an inquiry into his own party.

This is where you and people like you continue to fall flat on your face when it comes to attacking Corbyn. The guy is probably the most morally decent, anti-war, honourable people in Westminster (he was shown to have used the least amount of entitlements during the Parliamentary expenses scandal).

If the Tories and partisan morons like yourself continue to attack on personality Corbyn will be the next PM guaranteed.

Im sure there is plenty to attack in policy grounds. Focus there not on red herrings like terrorist connections and anti-semitism.
 
Again as has been pointed out to you more times than can be counted you actually have to show some evidence of Corbyn being anti semitic (not that you give a flying glory be about facts or evidence).

You havent pointed out anything to anyone. Just mindless apologism.

I am sure labour had an enquiry into anti semitism just for the sake of it.

Lovely bloke with lovely friends.


Jeremy-Corbyn-Hugo-Chavez-Facebook-RIP-e1439673012178.png


96766911_POTD_Corbyn-xlarge_trans_NvBQzQNjv4Bqeo_i_u9APj8RuoebjoAHt0k9u7HhRJvuo-ZLenGRumA.jpg
 
How do those irrelevant pictures show Corbyn is anti semitic? What a sad pathetic person you are.
 
Two can play this childish game of put the politician with the dictator.

Theresa May supports the Turkish dictator Erdogan. That must mean she supports the brutal crackdown on dissent and slow descent into a theological dictatorship that he has driven Turkey towards.

upload_2017-7-7_13-20-43.png

Theresa May also supports the brutal Saudi regime so she must also support beheading people in the public square for apostasy and witchcraft.

upload_2017-7-7_13-22-55.png

This is the braindead logic employed by people like Meds unable to debate substance. Ofcourse Theresa May doesnt support the human rights violations undertaken by Erdogan just as Corbyn doesnt support the human rights violations of Chavez. Chavez did have some noteworthy achievements and did give a s**t about the poor (and mixed that in with some horrible human rights violations).
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top