Here's where they all go wrong. Shallow graves are no good, they need to be deep, real deep.Kinda looks like a skull but that would be the shittest burial attempt ever.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Port Adelaide v Carlton - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Port at 63% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 12
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Here's where they all go wrong. Shallow graves are no good, they need to be deep, real deep.Kinda looks like a skull but that would be the shittest burial attempt ever.
Friend sent me a text saying Borce answered the phone yesterday with "Look, I can't talk now. I think the phone's bugged." and hung up on A Current Affair
I heard this on a news cross with someone on Sky News on Tuesday afternoon! Reckon it was only mentioned once but I definitely heard it because I made the comment to dad about how strange comment that was.
Friend sent me a text saying Borce answered the phone yesterday with "Look, I can't talk now. I think the phone's bugged." and hung up on A Current Affair
right with ya bud, burial 101, you can always tell the rookies eh? and good grief, whatever you do, don't get seen walking out of the bush at midnight with a shovel in your hand!!Here's where they all go wrong. Shallow graves are no good, they need to be deep, real deep.
That's because it was a shit burial attempt.Kinda looks like a skull but that would be the shittest burial attempt ever.
Wonder if the burial was 6 months ago when she went missing or more recentlyThat's because it was a shit burial attempt.
I know the area really well and regularly cycle past those logs as I go off-road on mountain bike when going up Loch Road, the last time being on Saturday morning and if I had paid more attention would have found the body myself.
It was a dumb location to bury someone, far too close to housing. The person probably came in from the Macedon side along the railway line, turned right into Loch Road, went round a couple of bends and thought they were deep in the woods, although in reality housing is very close. What's more there is a reasonable amount of people who go along that track, hikers, bike riders, horse riders, trail bike riders, dog walkers, even people wanting a lunchtime stroll. There are far better isolated places to dispose of a body within a few km's of that location. Obviously this was a person who did not know the area at all well.
It strikes me of someone burying in a panic
Lastly that story about the man with the shovel sounds like a load of bollocks.
That would seem to be ridiculously carelessI'm surprised a dog or fox didn't uncover the poor lady earlier.
Anyhow apparently a shovel found at the family home contains soil samples that may match the murder scene.
http://www.news.com.au/national/vic...s/news-story/9dc8114d82141e403cb1c14b6371c682
That's...... good to know.. There are far better isolated places to dispose of a body within a few km's of that location. .
Speaking from experience?Here's where they all go wrong. Shallow graves are no good, they need to be deep, real deep.
You're on point with a lot of your summation, but DNA is going to be of zero help here. Why any of his DNA is on her can be explained away quite simply with Day to day contactIt makes a huge difference...
They can establish method of murder, if there's any defensive wounds, if she has DNA (skin, hair, blood) of her assailant on her at all...
Let's think of the timeline...
Wife missing, husband interviewed, police request electronics, husband changes story to reiterate his movements for the day, both husband and deceased's phones ping cell towers towards location of body, police send his GPS to be cracked, 2 months later they possess the information that leads to the recovery of her body.
Either he will be arrested in the next week, or he is the unluckiest person in the history of Avondale Heights...
That's because it was a shit burial attempt.
It was a dumb location to bury someone, far too close to housing. The person probably came in from the Macedon side along the railway line, turned right into Loch Road, went round a couple of bends and thought they were deep in the woods, although in reality housing is very close. What's more there is a reasonable amount of people who go along that track, hikers, bike riders, horse riders, trail bike riders, dog walkers, even people wanting a lunchtime stroll. There are far better isolated places to dispose of a body within a few km's of that location. Obviously this was a person who did not know the area at all well.
It strikes me of someone burying in a panic
Lastly that story about the man with the shovel sounds like a load of bollocks.
Hes been doing this for 6 months. Wont leave the house, thinks hes being followed, phones tapped, family take food around for him. Guilt can really screw with peoples heads.
You're on point with a lot of your summation, but DNA is going to be of zero help here. Why any of his DNA is on her can be explained away quite simply with Day to day contact
You got to do it right, you got to have the hole already dug before you show up with a package in the trunk. Otherwise, you're talking about a half-hour to forty-five minutes worth of digging. And who knows who's going to come along in that time?Speaking from experience?
It's going to be harder for the prosecution when the forensic pathologist can't determine how Karen died.
http://www.smh.com.au/victoria/find...secution-top-lawyer-says-20170223-gujq1x.html
Strange. Sex game gone wrong or natural causes then panicked?
It sounds unnatural though. Money and relationship issues etc.
I would have thought suffocation without breaking bones would still lose bruising. Unless one was already unconscious and unable to retaliate and a lower standard of pressure applied to the neck perhaps?Yes and they had an argument, she just went for a walk apparently and never came back. Murder for sure, just proving who did it and how looks to be a bit tricky. Suffocation perhaps or strangulation with just enough pressure not to break any bones ie. hyoid.
I would have thought suffocation without breaking bones would still lose bruising. Unless one was already unconscious and unable to retaliate and a lower standard of pressure applied to the neck perhaps?