Remove this Banner Ad

Society/Culture Kyle Rittenhouse

  • Thread starter Thread starter RedVest4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Looks like the person who broke the gun laws is the guy missing a bicep and just spent a bunch of time telling CNN a different story than the evidence he gave in the trial.

This is how narratives get confused. There's the facts in court and then there are the facts for the people who don't have time to watch on the news... and they aren't the same.
 
Gun laws arent on trial the young boy is

So just so we're clear here, you would support an ANTIFA member heading down (armed) to the Capitol hill riots, or at Charlestons 'Unite the Right' rally, and shooting those right wing protestors there under the same circumstances as this bloke here did to the blokes he shot?

Just want to make sure you're consistent here.

You'd be on the side of the ANTIFA member in that case?
 
So just so we're clear here, you would support an ANTIFA member heading down (armed) to the Capitol hill riots, or at Charlestons 'Unite the Right' rally, and shooting those right wing protestors there under the same circumstances as this bloke here did?

Just want to make sure you're consistent here.
There were rioters just the night before in Kenosha with rifles, lined up in the street. Nobody threatened them and nobody was shot.

There's a non hyperbolic comparison
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

So just so we're clear here, you would support an ANTIFA member heading down (armed) to the Capitol hill riots, or at Charlestons 'Unite the Right' rally, and shooting those right wing protestors there under the same circumstances as this bloke here did to the blokes he shot?

Just want to make sure you're consistent here.

You'd be on the side of the ANTIFA member in that case?

If right wing rioters were destroying a city and a left leaning citizen decided to protect his community and was attacked for it and shot and killed those attacking him id expect the law to apply in the same manner as here. Politics of it shouldnt matter (but seemingly here they do to many)
 
If right wing rioters were destroying a city and a left leaning citizen decided to protect his community and was attacked for it and shot and killed those attacking him id expect the law to apply in the same manner as here. Politics of it shouldnt matter (but seemingly here they do to many)

No, there is no evidence that the people KR shot and killed were destroying a city. What they were trying to do was disarm him.

Again, in identical circumstances, are you down with ANTIFA affiliated arming themselves and heading on down to Right Wing rallies (like the Capital Hill rally and similar) and doing what KR did here (shooting people who tried to disarm them)?

Yes or No.
 
You don’t have to prove you were?
I don't think so in a criminal case. The burden of proof rests with the prosecution. So I think he could have just sat there and let the prosecution present their case and have his lawyer dispute their arguments. It was considered risky that he even took to the stand to give his testimony.
 
No, there is no evidence that the people KR shot and killed were destroying a city. What they were trying to do was disarm him.

Again, in identical circumstances, are you down with ANTIFA affiliated arming themselves and heading on down to Right Wing rallies (like the Capital Hill rally and similar) and doing what KR did here (shooting people who tried to disarm them)?

Yes or No.
The prosecutor himself admitted that at least one of them was an arsonist.
 
AN ENTIRE CITY on fire right there. A very small one, but an entire city no less!
You see that embellishment quite often on social media.

I came across a nutter on FB the other day who said four US cities had been burned down in protests.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

No, there is no evidence that the people KR shot and killed were destroying a city. What they were trying to do was disarm him.

Again, in identical circumstances, are you down with ANTIFA affiliated arming themselves and heading on down to Right Wing rallies (like the Capital Hill rally and similar) and doing what KR did here (shooting people who tried to disarm them)?

Yes or No.

Incorrect. The two deceased were both caught on camera trying to push a dumpster on fire into a gas station. Youre being deliberately obtuse now.

The law is the law. Ive said that already
 
AN ENTIRE CITY on fire right there. A very small one, but an entire city no less!

Sorry you were right. The protesters were all just there to politely challenge police
 
Incorrect. The two deceased were both caught on camera trying to push a dumpster on fire into a gas station.

OK, so you're saying that if two people are 'caught on camera trying to push a dumpster on fire into a gas station', it's OK for an ANTIFA member shoot each person dead several minutes later in an unrelated incident?

That's your position here?
 
Again, in identical circumstances, are you down with ANTIFA affiliated arming themselves and heading on down to Right Wing rallies (like the Capital Hill rally and similar) and doing what KR did here (shooting people who tried to disarm them)?

Yes or No.
I've already posed that question (to the same poster I think) and, surprise, surprise, it gets avoided/deflected.

Anything to avoid admitting that vigilantism is something they agree with only when it suits their philosophical/political leanings.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I've already posed that question (to the same poster I think) and, surprise, surprise, it gets avoided/deflected.

Anything to avoid admitting that vigilantism is something they agree with only when it suits their philosophical/political leanings.

Something that never ceases to amaze me.

The exact same pricks that are quick to denounce all Muslims for the horrors of Islamic terrorism, are apologists or even cheerleaders for the Norway and Christchurch shooters.
 
Sorry you were right. The protesters were all just there to politely challenge police
No brah they were there to burn down the whole city.

I am sure this vigilantism is OK, though.
 
Interestingly enough I think we are going to see the sole shooting survivor come out as an ANTIFA type, the one with the illegal concealed carried handgun that was pointed at Rittenhouse's head while he was on the ground before he copped a shot himself.
 
No brah they were there to burn down the whole city.

I am sure this vigilantism is OK, though.

Weren't you the one who used the "entire city" line?

And now you're mocking other people like they said it?
 
OK, so you're saying that if two people are 'caught on camera trying to push a dumpster on fire into a gas station', it's OK for an ANTIFA member shoot each person dead several minutes later in an unrelated incident?

That's your position here?

Two different questions that again you are trying to deliberately confuse for a gotcha moment. You said neither was destroying anything. Fact is both were trying to but that wasnt why they were killed. They were killed coz they tried to kill a man who had an AK and failed to take it off him before he could use it on them in self defence
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom