Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Gun laws arent on trial the young boy is
There were rioters just the night before in Kenosha with rifles, lined up in the street. Nobody threatened them and nobody was shot.So just so we're clear here, you would support an ANTIFA member heading down (armed) to the Capitol hill riots, or at Charlestons 'Unite the Right' rally, and shooting those right wing protestors there under the same circumstances as this bloke here did?
Just want to make sure you're consistent here.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
So just so we're clear here, you would support an ANTIFA member heading down (armed) to the Capitol hill riots, or at Charlestons 'Unite the Right' rally, and shooting those right wing protestors there under the same circumstances as this bloke here did to the blokes he shot?
Just want to make sure you're consistent here.
You'd be on the side of the ANTIFA member in that case?
If some people could get over that little hurdle this thread would be about 20 pages shorterthe concept of legally bearing arms is a real mind melter for some people itt
If right wing rioters were destroying a city and a left leaning citizen decided to protect his community and was attacked for it and shot and killed those attacking him id expect the law to apply in the same manner as here. Politics of it shouldnt matter (but seemingly here they do to many)
I don't think so in a criminal case. The burden of proof rests with the prosecution. So I think he could have just sat there and let the prosecution present their case and have his lawyer dispute their arguments. It was considered risky that he even took to the stand to give his testimony.You don’t have to prove you were?
The prosecutor himself admitted that at least one of them was an arsonist.No, there is no evidence that the people KR shot and killed were destroying a city. What they were trying to do was disarm him.
Again, in identical circumstances, are you down with ANTIFA affiliated arming themselves and heading on down to Right Wing rallies (like the Capital Hill rally and similar) and doing what KR did here (shooting people who tried to disarm them)?
Yes or No.
You see that embellishment quite often on social media.AN ENTIRE CITY on fire right there. A very small one, but an entire city no less!
No, there is no evidence that the people KR shot and killed were destroying a city. What they were trying to do was disarm him.
Again, in identical circumstances, are you down with ANTIFA affiliated arming themselves and heading on down to Right Wing rallies (like the Capital Hill rally and similar) and doing what KR did here (shooting people who tried to disarm them)?
Yes or No.
Incorrect. The two deceased were both caught on camera trying to push a dumpster on fire into a gas station.
I've already posed that question (to the same poster I think) and, surprise, surprise, it gets avoided/deflected.Again, in identical circumstances, are you down with ANTIFA affiliated arming themselves and heading on down to Right Wing rallies (like the Capital Hill rally and similar) and doing what KR did here (shooting people who tried to disarm them)?
Yes or No.
I've already posed that question (to the same poster I think) and, surprise, surprise, it gets avoided/deflected.
Anything to avoid admitting that vigilantism is something they agree with only when it suits their philosophical/political leanings.
OK, so you're saying that if two people are 'caught on camera trying to push a dumpster on fire into a gas station', it's OK for an ANTIFA member shoot each person dead several minutes later in an unrelated incident?
That's your position here?