List Mgmt. List planning 2015 and onwards

[FishingRick04]

The Dees were apparently working out 2 yrs in late August. If he's on the table, something else must be going on

Maybe he's had enough?

 

[Portia]

Maybe he's had enough?

Could be! You'd understand why

 

[manureid]

Maybe he's had enough?

Maybe?

 

[manureid]

Do you reckon when a player is drafted to Melbourne, and things invariably go **** up, he thinks to himself, 'I have been Melbournised'?

 

[chiwigi]

So Hartlett has been offered stupid money by Richmond, wouldn't blame him going. Especially if we trade some decent picks.
Tredrea said 750k over 5 years and 700k with North for 6 years.

He's not worth anywhere near that.

 

[Shaucob_Burjan]

Toumpas would be a good get.

 

[manureid]

So Hartlett has been offered stupid money by Richmond, wouldn't blame him going. Especially if we trade some decent picks.
Tredrea said 750k over 5 years and 700k with North for 6 years.

He's not worth anywhere near that.

Big bikkies if true. Not sure we are matching that.

 

[bringbackbucky]

So Hartlett has been offered stupid money by Richmond, wouldn't blame him going. Especially if we trade some decent picks.
Tredrea said 750k over 5 years and 700k with North for 6 years.

He's not worth anywhere near that.

Just heard that. Would be devastating but couldn't begrudge the kid for leaving. Would be irresponsible for PAFC to go anywhere near matching that.

 

[chiwigi]

Just heard that. Would be devastating but couldn't begrudge the kid for leaving. Would be irresponsible for PAFC to go anywhere near matching that.

Absolutely, that's a cut your losses and move on type of thing.

Would open up space for a different need though.

 

[BornPort]

How come you don't hear anybody in the football media questioning how Richmond or Norf can fit that in their salary caps?

 

[manureid]

Just heard that. Would be devastating but couldn't begrudge the kid for leaving. Would be irresponsible for PAFC to go anywhere near matching that.

Is he a RFA next year? If so, we are well advised if he is going to go, to trade him this year, otherwise we risk getting diddly for him. Lets just hope he is willing to stay for less.

 

[manureid]

Absolutely, that's a cut your losses and move on type of thing.

Would open up space for a different need though.

Trade him and go for Bennell!

 

[Holden Hillbilly]

Trade him and go for Bennell!

No way we could risk Bennell after losing Hartlett.

We should go for a team player without personal issues.

 

[Hong-Kong Phooey]

I reckon you'll find Young, Moore and O'Shea will be gone.

Expect Jimmy Toumpas to be a Port player.

has your tobasco had any more to say on this lately?

 

[PAFCsince1870]

We won't trade Hartlett. He's a contracted player and I refuse to believe guys like KT and Hinkley would jump at shadows in fear of his impending free agency next year.

 

[Portia]

We won't trade Hartlett. He's a contracted player and I refuse to believe guys like KT and Hinkley would jump at shadows in fear of his impending free agency next year.

If we traded him this year it would be for premiership push, not fear.

 

[PAFCsince1870]

If we traded him this year it would be for premiership push, not fear.

How would getting rid of Hartlett help any premiership push? He would be traded for draft picks.

The teams reported to be interested would all consider themselves in premiership windows and won't be handing back players in return.

 

[Portia]

How would getting rid of Hartlett help any premiership push? He would be traded for draft picks.

How do you think we will pay for Dixon? Draft picks. This way we would keep good ones.

The teams reported to be interested would all consider themselves in premiership windows and won't be handing back players in return.

When you have draft picks you can talk to every club, not just the one trying to poach your contracted player - and because the player is contracted your worst case scenario is you keep them...incentivises other clubs to work with you.

The above does not constitute endorsement for the trading of Hamish Hartlett. Portia recommends that you consult an accredited list manager when determining your football future.

 

[charcolechaddy]

Hammers not stupid enough to go to Richmond.

 

[Janus]

How would getting rid of Hartlett help any premiership push? He would be traded for draft picks.

The teams reported to be interested would all consider themselves in premiership windows and won't be handing back players in return.

Hartlett to Richmond for their first and second round picks. Trade Richmond's first, our second and Richmond's second to Gold Coast for Dixon and Bennell, and draft Curnow/Matthieson/Ah Chee with Pick 10.

So Hartlett and our second round pick for Dixon and Bennell, plus we keep our first round pick.

 

[JayPea14]

Hammers not stupid enough to go to Richmond.

Money talks mate....footballers unfortunately have a limited time in the game so gotta maximise their contracts

 

[REVERSED]

Hammers not stupid enough to go to Richmond.

God I hope so. Ill loose another favourite player Actually they are all my favourite xD I need to stop saying that.

 

[Portia]

Hartlett to Richmond for their first and second round picks.

For a $750k player, you'd expect Richmond's 2015 & 2016 first rounders

 

[raman]

Hammers not stupid enough to go to Richmond.

For $750k a year I'd tend barehanded to Dustin Martin's various STI's.

 

[Janus]

For a $750k player, you'd expect Richmond's 2015 & 2016 first rounders

Yeah, I forgot you could trade future draft picks now