Pure_Ownage
TheBrownDog
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2008
- Posts
- 67,979
- Reaction score
- 87,691
- Location
- PODS fan club office
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Re: Blake Nuts and Bolts
While I agree (well now anyway, a few years ago I would have said Otto got quite close to him) I just thought the comment indicated that Scott really rates Ottens. I also noted his comments about Ottens playing forward, and while I don't think Otto can do that well unless he's found more speed and fitness from what he had this year, I think it's a hint that Scott is planning with this new rule to play two ruckmen who are both capable of spending a fair bit of time forward when the other one is rucking. Which is very much a doom and gloom scenario with Blake, because I can't see him being anywhere near competent in a forward line (even a slow Otto is much more competent there, and West Vardy etc are better options within the forward 50).
If 211 is fit, Ottens gets nowhere near him, and we don't play Freo every week,and we won a flag in 09, and how many games did Ottens play
? and Blake? All this "doom and gloom" is BF. We have what we have and the fact that Saints and Pies got the better of us 2010 had very little to do with Blake/Ottens/Gardiner/King/McEvoy/Jolley/Leroy.
While I agree (well now anyway, a few years ago I would have said Otto got quite close to him) I just thought the comment indicated that Scott really rates Ottens. I also noted his comments about Ottens playing forward, and while I don't think Otto can do that well unless he's found more speed and fitness from what he had this year, I think it's a hint that Scott is planning with this new rule to play two ruckmen who are both capable of spending a fair bit of time forward when the other one is rucking. Which is very much a doom and gloom scenario with Blake, because I can't see him being anywhere near competent in a forward line (even a slow Otto is much more competent there, and West Vardy etc are better options within the forward 50).







