- Joined
- Oct 8, 2014
- Posts
- 1,365
- Reaction score
- 2,229
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Yeah but the first time i was referring to a different type of joystickweren't you the one who told me to put the joystick down? I cba for playstation in the last two weeks
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Yeah but the first time i was referring to a different type of joystickweren't you the one who told me to put the joystick down? I cba for playstation in the last two weeks
No. It was simply an opportunity and Milburn took it.
It needs to be remembered, it was 13 seasons ago now. Although the game was well and truly in the process of being sanitised, it wasn't like it is now. There were plenty (and I'm one of them) who shared the view what Milburn did was fine - the ball was right there, he used his hip, and he didn't use or raise an arm. I watched the game with a Carlton-supporting mate who thought that. The faux outrage that plenty indulged in afterwards I think was mainly because Silvagni being the victim. If Silvagni had done that to Milburn, there would not have been outrage, and there almost certainly would have been the routine giggles about how soft Geelong players were.
If people want to discuss the wisdom of Milburn clapping the Carlton supporters, that's a different argument. Probably not the best idea. Even so, for those who were there, the 'near riot' was nowhere near as bad as people made out. The game was nearly over, everyone was drenched, most fans just wanted to leave.
I reckon they have the worst supportor base going around.I was there that day seeing us get our bums kicked it the rain. I was located right behind the interchange bench where Milburn clapped the Carlton supporters as he exited the ground. There was lots of angst in that particular area of the crowd and I was nestled in amongst a sea of Blues fans who then proceeded to abuse any Geelong supporter within striking distance. It was from that point on that my hatred of the Carlton Football Club began and to this day is still as strong as ever!
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
To not have Mark Blake in that poll but the likes of Thompson, Harley etc is just staggering.It's the off season. I'm bored. Lets spice things up around here with a provoking thread guaranteed to divide opinion and cause arguements!
Come on! Who holds a grudge? Who is an all-loving hippy?![]()
I agree with this, the game was different in 2001 and Milburn's hit on Silvagni was not considered nearly as bad back then as it would be today.No. It was simply an opportunity and Milburn took it.
It needs to be remembered, it was 13 seasons ago now. Although the game was well and truly in the process of being sanitised, it wasn't like it is now. There were plenty (and I'm one of them) who shared the view what Milburn did was fine - the ball was right there, he used his hip, and he didn't use or raise an arm. I watched the game with a Carlton-supporting mate who thought that. The faux outrage that plenty indulged in afterwards I think was mainly because Silvagni being the victim. If Silvagni had done that to Milburn, there would not have been outrage, and there almost certainly would have been the routine giggles about how soft Geelong players were.
If people want to discuss the wisdom of Milburn clapping the Carlton supporters, that's a different argument. Probably not the best idea. Even so, for those who were there, the 'near riot' was nowhere near as bad as people made out. The game was nearly over, everyone was drenched, most fans just wanted to leave.
So I can understand Carlton fans being upset, but their level of outrage was (and remains) way over the top. I guess it doesn't pay to be the one who shoots Bambi.
I agree with this, the game was different in 2001 and Milburn's hit on Silvagni was not considered nearly as bad back then as it would be today.
My only caveat to this is that it needs to be remembered that this was our last game of the season, we were getting flogged, and we were not going to make the finals. Carlton on the other hand were locked into the finals, and were playing the following week. If the roles were reversed, and a Carlton player illegally cleaned up one of key players when we had a final to play the following week, I would have been severely pissed off.
So I can understand Carlton fans being upset, but their level of outrage was (and remains) way over the top. I guess it doesn't pay to be the one who shoots Bambi.
Anyway, could Mark Blake be discussed in this thread? After all, there was the stories about his/his family's behaviour during the '07 finals, the fact he "cost" us Mumford and resulted in King being traded.
Regularly derided when he played.
I actually thought he was a good tap ruckman who could/should have done a bit more around the ground but was very durable (something we can't really say for two of our current incumbents).
As for the off-field stuff, there is bound to be several versions in play but he copped his fair share on this board when he was with us.
Not just any player. It would have been the equivalent of Darren Hulme knocking Buddha Hocking out at Kardinia Park, right down to the fact that if Hocking hadn't got up for the following week (assuming, for a moment, Geelong had a finals series to prepare for), that could quite easily have been it for his career. Stretchered off after a cheap shot by a relative (at the time) nobody in a game that had been done and dusted for about an hour. Only if Hulme had decided to clap himself off in response to the boos and abuse as he jogged to the bench.
This. He was a serviceable tap ruckman who was unlucky enough to come into his career in a time when the game was changing and it was more important to be a versatile player. At another time he would have been a quality player, but unfortunately just couldn't develop the skills required. I've never heard any indication that it was a lack of effort on his part. He never seemed a 'popular' part of the group either, but I can't see that you can hate him for that.Not by me. He's not responsible for what his family members may or may not have said or done (and that's mostly speculation as well).
Served us well as a player. A good tap ruckman who deservedly got to play in one premiership. Was very durable too (imagine us having a durable senior ruckman now). Since he was moved on by the club, to my knowledge has never expressed the slightest anger or bitterness. Unlike say, Mumford or Prismall.
This. He was a serviceable tap ruckman who was unlucky enough to come into his career in a time when the game was changing and it was more important to be a versatile player. At another time he would have been a quality player, but unfortunately just couldn't develop the skills required. I've never heard any indication that it was a lack of effort on his part. He never seemed a 'popular' part of the group either, but I can't see that you can hate him for that.
As for his attitude after 2007 GF, well, he was disappointed and fair enough. I reckon most people would too. Look at the footage of Stokesy after the 2009 granny and you'll notice he doesn't crack a smile once, but no one's crucifying him for that. If his family did some dumb stuff, well, sometimes family do dumb stuff in sticking up for you.
I followed up his local league a couple of times and noticed he was regularly listed in the goals & best players, so hopefully he continued to enjoy his footy.
Not by me. He's not responsible for what his family members may or may not have said or done (and that's mostly speculation as well).
Served us well as a player. A good tap ruckman who deservedly got to play in one premiership. Was very durable too (imagine us having a durable senior ruckman now). Since he was moved on by the club, to my knowledge has never expressed the slightest anger or bitterness. Unlike say, Mumford or Prismall.
Remember that game in 2010, I think. Swans played Cats at Geelong, and fat Mumford deliberately and literally fell on top of GAJ. Got reported and copped a suspension, I think.Mumford is just a selfish prick of a bloke.
No time for him whatsoever.
Only going on what I've been hearing/reading mate!To not have Mark Blake in that poll but the likes of Thompson, Harley etc is just staggering.
Who is it?http://transform.fairfaxregional.co...82585.JPG/r0_90_3516_2077_w1200_h678_fmax.jpg
would have run away with the votes had he been added to the poll![]()
didn't he sling tackle him to the ground which really hurt the shoulder?
Possibly may have been where Gazza's latest shoulder issues have arisen from.
I was there that day seeing us get our bums kicked it the rain. I was located right behind the interchange bench where Milburn clapped the Carlton supporters as he exited the ground. There was lots of angst in that particular area of the crowd and I was nestled in amongst a sea of Blues fans who then proceeded to abuse any Geelong supporter within striking distance. It was from that point on that my hatred of the Carlton Football Club began and to this day is still as strong as ever!
The day I'm your age and there are people who are my age using a footy forum I'm sure I'll bait of them too don't worry
There is a "type" of player I dislike, the one who was given a break by Geelong. He may have been a straggler or have limited talent or not quite established himself yet. Geelong invested time in the person and next thing he looks for greener more lucrative pastures.
Examples - David Bolton, Shane Mumford, Brent Prismall.
Would he have? Didn't Kelly come into the side for him the next game?Not sure Prismall fits that description. He was a reasonably early draft pick (not top 10, but you'd be expecting to get a long-term player at #32) and at the time when he went down with his ACL in the 2008 QF, he was looking every bit like a cornerstone of our future midfield, as an inside/outside tandem with Selwood. Ignoring his first and last games of that season, he was going at 24.1 disposals per game, he'd kicked eight goals in ten games and he would have walked into that Grand Final team, on exposed form. Ultimately he made a bad decision and I'm still not sure why he would feel that Essendon was a better choice at that point than Geelong would have been. He would have played in the 2008 Grand Final, had he not been injured and even if he'd stayed at Geelong with his injury, he would have been every chance of making that premiership side as well. Dumb decision, but oh well. It got us Motlop.
Would he have? Didn't Kelly come into the side for him the next game?