Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Murph was great with 4 and Simmo ended up being one of the leading Aussie possession winners. Great games by our two boys![]()
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
If there's one thing life has taught me, it's to never doubt the delusions of a Collingwood supporter...I swear if any Collingwood supporter or ANY supporter for that matter comes out and honestly thinks Pendlebury is in the same league as Murphy, I'll eat a hat.
How good is that hip flick?Murphy's standing evasion when in the possession of the ball is his best attribute IMHO.
I swear if any Collingwood supporter or ANY supporter for that matter comes out and honestly thinks Pendlebury is in the same league as Murphy, I'll eat a hat. Pendles had the chance to win it let alone draw it for the Aussies with a simple kick which fell short and was way offline. Let alone missing targets all night.
You realise this is international rules right?
You really had me laughing.
Murphy was outstanding, he and Pendlebury turned it on in the last quarter (Murphy more so, but Pendles whether you like it or not did it too) and led the comeback. Not sure how you can say he was missing targets all night, when he was only really seen in the last quarter, where he was hitting his targets. Shame he can't kick for goal too well with the round ball.
Didn't think much of Simpson at all, but Murphy was brilliant.
Whilst I agree with you about Pendlebury. Simpson was excellent tonight. had it the equal most disposals of anyone on the Australian side and ran hard all night. Best on ground in my opinion. I'm not sure what game you were watching?
You realise this is international rules right?
You really had me laughing.
Murphy was outstanding, he and Pendlebury turned it on in the last quarter (Murphy more so, but Pendles whether you like it or not did it too) and led the comeback. Not sure how you can say he was missing targets all night, when he was only really seen in the last quarter, where he was hitting his targets. Shame he can't kick for goal too well with the round ball.
Didn't think much of Simpson at all, but Murphy was brilliant.
Ladies and gentleman.. I give you your typical, one eyed Collingwood Supporter!
"Pendlebury turned it on in the last quarter and led the comeback" whilst you didn't "Think much of Simpson at all" who did happen to have 25 disposals 6 marks 2 tackles and 2 FF to Pendlebury's 13 touches 2 marks 1 FF and 1 FA.
I guess the only thing to say about this is that your entitled to your own opinion on the game.
Pendlebury had 2 touches till 3 quarter time. And then found it and sparked the revival. Murph converted 4 overs and starred for all the night. That's the difference between the two.
Put the two together and Murphy>>Pendlebury. In any category you want to put them in. Pendles is good Murph is just better.
ANd Simpson was one player who did a hell of alot of good things and didn't just do the odd saving tackle ala Thomas. Provided a lot of run and was good with his disposal. If you didn't notice him tonight then you weren't watching the same game that everyone else was.
Not to mention Pendlebury's 2 stuff ups at goal, the last one when the game was on the line. That was bloody dreadful.Ladies and gentleman.. I give you your typical, one eyed Collingwood Supporter!
"Pendlebury turned it on in the last quarter and led the comeback" whilst you didn't "Think much of Simpson at all" who did happen to have 25 disposals 6 marks 2 tackles and 2 FF to Pendlebury's 13 touches 2 marks 1 FF and 1 FA.
I guess the only thing to say about this is that your entitled to your own opinion on the game.
Take a number.I have a man crush on Murphy.
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you your typical parrot understudy. Nice use of changing a quote.
I clearly said Murphy and Pendlebury led the comeback. And 11 of those touches from Pendlebury were in the last quarter, which is what I said. Pendlebury was nowhere in the first 3, but he turned it on in the last and led the comeback with Murph. Sounded like commentators agreed with me too... he was instrumental in the last.
But please, change this post into something that suits your argument, by all means.![]()
his disposals going forward tonight were a joke... Lead the comeback my arse.Pendles, only reason he is there is because no 1 else wanted to and he sucked up to Malthouse
for anyone who doubted simo, this should put an end to it