kane249
Doom does as he pleases
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2006
- Posts
- 55,555
- Reaction score
- 78,757
- Location
- Behind enemy Lines
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Sth Freo, Liverpool, Chicago Bulls
Still holding out for a suspended sentence, but doesn't look good 

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 13
The Golden Ticket - Corporate tickets, functions, Open Air Boxes at the Adelaide Oval, ENGIE, Gabba, MCG, Marvel, Optus & People First Stadiums. Corporate Suites at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.

Murray has been jailed for a year
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Eligilble for parole after 6 months
It's about right.Wow - 12 month sentence seems harsh.
I'm not against a term of incarceration - but I would have thought 45 days would be sufficient
Either way - it sounds from the defence evidence that is career over.
Can't say he's been unfairly treated either
A teenager will have to undergo counselling and do community work after a thuggish NYE attack
Posted Fri 10 Jan 2014, 4:14pm AEDT
A 19-year-old man has avoided being sent to jail for what a Perth judge described as unprovoked and thuggish attack on two men in the early hours of New Years Day last year.
Israel Jordon Charles George Loo and a juvenile repeatedly punched and kicked the victims after one of them wished their attackers a Happy New Year.
The District Court was told one of the men suffered a broken jaw and has permanently lost sensation in his lips and teeth.
Loo pleaded guilty to charges of assault and causing grievous bodily harm.
Judge Richard Keen imposed an 18-month suspended jail term, and said Loo was still only a young man, and since the offences, he had shown real signs of rehabilitation.
Loo will have to undertake counselling and also carry out 60 hours of community service work.
It's about right.
45 days would achieve nothing given the judicial view on unprovoked assaults.
My understanding is in that case there we no background circumstances such as in Murray's case whereby he had threatened etc.That's a bit subjective. The below attack for example has lasting health implications for the victim which aren't present in Murray's case.
It's GBH, not common assault or AOBH TFS; a suspended sentence is an absolute exception to the rule... I said that many times earlier in the thread.So many blokes get suspended sentences nowadays or community orders - it just seems odd that this one gets 12 months.
I'm not completely against it - but I'd like the same sentence metred out more often - rather than this being the exception