Remove this Banner Ad

Murray Newman

  • Thread starter Thread starter West123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

He should be pretty happy with that TBH. Wonder if this will spell the end.
 
Wow - 12 month sentence seems harsh.

I'm not against a term of incarceration - but I would have thought 45 days would be sufficient

Either way - it sounds from the defence evidence that is career over.
It's about right.
45 days would achieve nothing given the judicial view on unprovoked assaults.
 
Can't say he's been unfairly treated either

That's a bit subjective. The below attack for example has lasting health implications for the victim which aren't present in Murray's case.

A teenager will have to undergo counselling and do community work after a thuggish NYE attack
Posted Fri 10 Jan 2014, 4:14pm AEDT

A 19-year-old man has avoided being sent to jail for what a Perth judge described as unprovoked and thuggish attack on two men in the early hours of New Years Day last year.

Israel Jordon Charles George Loo and a juvenile repeatedly punched and kicked the victims after one of them wished their attackers a Happy New Year.

The District Court was told one of the men suffered a broken jaw and has permanently lost sensation in his lips and teeth.

Loo pleaded guilty to charges of assault and causing grievous bodily harm.

Judge Richard Keen imposed an 18-month suspended jail term, and said Loo was still only a young man, and since the offences, he had shown real signs of rehabilitation.

Loo will have to undertake counselling and also carry out 60 hours of community service work.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

It's about right.
45 days would achieve nothing given the judicial view on unprovoked assaults.

So many blokes get suspended sentences nowadays or community orders - it just seems odd that this one gets 12 months.

I'm not completely against it - but I'd like the same sentence metred out more often - rather than this being the exception
 
That's a bit subjective. The below attack for example has lasting health implications for the victim which aren't present in Murray's case.
My understanding is in that case there we no background circumstances such as in Murray's case whereby he had threatened etc.
 
So many blokes get suspended sentences nowadays or community orders - it just seems odd that this one gets 12 months.

I'm not completely against it - but I'd like the same sentence metred out more often - rather than this being the exception
It's GBH, not common assault or AOBH TFS; a suspended sentence is an absolute exception to the rule... I said that many times earlier in the thread.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom