Remove this Banner Ad

My Sentiments Exactly

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jars458
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Joined
Apr 20, 2001
Posts
28,281
Reaction score
11,289
Location
Adelaide Oval / Anfield
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Adelaide Utd,Liverpool, WWT Eagles.
realfooty.com.au

Wanga should get an Oscar
By Jake Niall
July 8, 2004

There is a decorated Brownlow medallist with movie-star looks whose terrible acting can be an embarrassment to himself and his club. And it isn't Shane Crawford.

Gavin Wanganeen is the AFL's leading thespian. The astonishing array of skills he demonstrates on the field includes the backwards fall, the swan dive, the writhe-in-bogus-agony and many other fakes designed to con umpires.

Too often these World Wrestling-Jackie Chan techniques succeed in creating optical illusions that deceive our beleaguered umpires, who cannot be expected to keep up with the play and the latest in football fakery.

Fraser Gehrig is the most notable recent victim of Wanganeen's peerless staging. On Sunday, the troubled Saints spearhead gave Port's Rubber Man a half-hearted shove around the shoulder blade.

Wanganeen hit the deck faster than the Brisbane doctor after Damien Peverill's shove. From a distance, Rubber Man made it appear as though Gehrig had smacked him in the head and went down in a manner befitting the worst soccer dives, not an Australian football champion. Wanga, needless to add, was handed a dubious free and Gehrig, who had enough trouble on his plate, was dragged.



advertisement

advertisement

In terms of acting in sport, Wanga's backward pike was almost in the Rivaldo World Cup class. Unfortunately, there is no punitive action for excessive staging in the AFL.

Wanganeen is by no means the only player skilled in the dramatic arts, although his diving is Greg Louganis-like. Matthew Lloyd would share the podium with him, while there are several others, mostly little men - Brent Harvey and Leon Davis among them - who would fight for the bronze.

In fairness to Lloyd, he gets scragged plenty by full-backs and if he can make a slight shove appear three times more forceful, he is probably getting back what the umpires owe him.

Wanganeen simply does it better because he is more practised. He has been feinting and fainting since he was an Essendon prodigy in the early '90s; as a small, highly skilled player, perhaps playing for frees was a survival mechanism.

In 1993, Kevin Sheedy, with his usual flair for overstatement, said Wanganeen was "a marked man" after three players were suspended for attacks on him. He won the Brownlow that season.

The hammy acting would be amusing if there were not potentially severe consequences for those who are silly enough to lay a hand on Rubber Man. These days, the tribunal is rubbing players out for glorified shoves to the face and other football equivalents to jaywalking.

Luke Penny was suspended for kneeing Wanganeen - a more serious offence - pending an appeal. On this occasion, Wanganeen didn't over-dramatise the contact as much, although he certainly didn't hide his pain. At the tribunal, as he sought to do his belated best for Penny, Wanganeen said the hurt he displayed was due to his chronic dodgy back.

Wanganeen is one of the greats of the game. There is hardly a more watchable player, or one with such a complete package - he can mark, kick and evade. He is quick and courageous and reads the play with the best of them.

In my mind, though, the acting is a blot on an otherwise perfect copy. The faked free-falls have hurt his standing in the game, particularly among opposition supporters.

Wanganeen should be in the Michael Voss, James Hird category of champions who are feted beyond their own club. But by dint of his diving, Wanganeen irritates as much as he enthralls - on talkback this week, his theatrical work has drawn much ire.

If he has not already done so, Mark Williams should pull Wanganeen aside and tell him to tone it down, to leave the acting to Crawford productions.
 
Wanganeen is a genuine star player but watching him does lose appeal due to his acting. I think a lot of it is habit now and he would find it very hard to stop.
 
Despite what most people seem to think, Wanganeen is not the only footballer in Australia that plays for free kicks. In fact there would be dozens more in the AFL now that do it a lot more than him. Thats pretty much a fact. Wanganeens diving is overrated. SUre early on in his career he did it quite a bit, but since 98-99 onwards hes taken it almost completely out of his game. Over the past 4-5 seasons he would have dived no more than 90% of the rest of the AFL.

As for that Gehrig incident. It was hilarious. It was THE perfect dive. Just about everyone would have thought Gehrig lost the plot and decked him and he played it perfectly. There was no free kick given from it, no goal scored, no report, no nothing. How often do you see players fall over like they weigh a feather in a push and shove? Just about every scuffle there is. Most of the time a free kick is paid from it. Especially at a ball up/throw in situation.

Despite what people think, not everytime Wanganeen gets a free kick its because he faked it. Same as Lloyd. Because of one or two notable acting performances, suddenly everyone thinks that everytime a free kick is paid its a dodgy one, no matter how much Wanganeen actually gets pummelled.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Originally posted by Kane McGoodwin
The AFL should start paying free kicks against those who blatantly act for a free kick.

But how can you tell? Its easy to tell players act or dive when you see the third replay from the third different angle at half pace. At full pace it looks real, thats why they do it. Most players do it. Most players do it more than Wanganeen does it. Its just everytime he does it it gets brought up in the media. Noone ever mentions when players get tackled across their shoulders or biceps and throw their heads back like someones yanked their hair from behind.

At normal speed it looked like Gehrig had whack Wanganeen in the jaw. Was only in replay it was seen that Gehrig pushed him in the shoulder. Its no different to at a bounce down and a midfielder and a tagger are bumping each other and one falls over like hes been shot and gets a free kick. That happens just about every match. How come there arent articles blasting those that do that?

Anyway, Wanganeen didnt get a free kick for it....the free kick had already been paid earlier after Gehrig put down Wilson.

Every team has a player that is good at the art of diving. Every team has been on the positive and negative side of diving. If they get away with it, good on em. You dont hear people complain and whinge when someone on their team has overplayed a situation and got a free kick or shot at goal out of it!
 
Originally posted by Macca19
Most players do it.

Most players do it more than Wanganeen does it.

You dont hear people complain and whinge when someone on their team has overplayed a situation and got a free kick or shot at goal out of it!

1) Disagree. Some do, not all.

2) Rubbish, he is a master at it. Usually you are unbiased but on this one I think you are very wrong

3) I hate it. Carey and Burton are teh main culprits for us and I don't like it.
 
Originally posted by Macca19
Despite what most people seem to think, Wanganeen is not the only footballer in Australia that plays for free kicks. In fact there would be dozens more in the AFL now that do it a lot more than him. Thats pretty much a fact. Wanganeens diving is overrated. SUre early on in his career he did it quite a bit, but since 98-99 onwards hes taken it almost completely out of his game. Over the past 4-5 seasons he would have dived no more than 90% of the rest of the AFL.
Cry me a river. Some players do it but no one does it more than Wanganeen. He is the master of it. Yes every team has a player or 2 that dive and play for free kicks. Hell we have Burton BUT don't give me this crap that Wanganeen does it less than some others.

Rose coloured glasses off please:rolleyes:
 
Originally posted by Macca19
You dont hear people complain and whinge when someone on their team has overplayed a situation and got a free kick or shot at goal out of it!
I agree that most people are happy to receive the free kick that isn't there but to be honest I get frustrated with any Crows player who plays for a free kick instead of going for the ball. I really get annoyed when it takes them out of the play and as a result the opposition end up getting an easy ball. IMO playing for frees is a dangerous game and would always prefer the player to get the ball.
 
Originally posted by Jars458
1) Disagree. Some do, not all.

I didnt say ALL do it.

2) Rubbish, he is a master at it. Usually you are unbiased but on this one I think you are very wrong

SUre when he does do it he does it perfectly. Just because he is a master at it doesnt mean he does it 10 time a week. He barely dives anymore. There was a 2 year period where he was doing it a ridiculous amount. Over the past 4 seasons hes cut it out mostly out of his game and rarely does it anymore.

3) I hate it. Carey and Burton are teh main culprits for us and I don't like it.

Most supporters dont complain when they get one their way tho.
 
Originally posted by Macca19
I didnt say ALL do it.



SUre when he does do it he does it perfectly. Just because he is a master at it doesnt mean he does it 10 time a week. He barely dives anymore. There was a 2 year period where he was doing it a ridiculous amount. Over the past 4 seasons hes cut it out mostly out of his game and rarely does it anymore.



Most supporters dont complain when they get one their way tho.


Sorry I meant some do it instead of most do it.

Will take your word he is doing it less because I only watch two port games a year;)

Of course you don't complain, as there's not a lot you can do about it.
 
Wanganeen isn't that good at diving. I rarely have ever seen him get a free kick for his dives. He just looks ridiculous.


****
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Originally posted by Stiffy_18
Cry me a river. Some players do it but no one does it more than Wanganeen. He is the master of it. Yes every team has a player or 2 that dive and play for free kicks. Hell we have Burton BUT don't give me this crap that Wanganeen does it less than some others.

Rose coloured glasses off please:rolleyes:

Are you ok Stiffy? Pretty spiteful reply for such a nothing thread.

1) Im not the one crying about it! As ive stated I couldnt care less. Just about every player in the league would have played for a free kick at one point. Lots of players do it. Sometimes you are the beneficiary, sometimes you arent.

2) Just because he is the 'master' at it doesnt mean every free kick he gets is because of acting or that he does it a dozen times a week. If you believe this then feel free to borrow those glasses off of me.
 
Originally posted by Macca19
Are you ok Stiffy? Pretty spiteful reply for such a nothing thread.

1) Im not the one crying about it! As ive stated I couldnt care less. Just about every player in the league would have played for a free kick at one point. Lots of players do it. Sometimes you are the beneficiary, sometimes you arent.

2) Just because he is the 'master' at it doesnt mean every free kick he gets is because of acting or that he does it a dozen times a week. If you believe this then feel free to borrow those glasses off of me.
Nothing spiteful about the post at all.

I just think that he plays for the frees more often than you are suggesting. I never said that every free kick he receives is acting. I am saying he does it more often than most. Sometimes he cons the umpires, sometimes he doesn't. Once or twice a week is way too much. I rate Gav as a gun but thats the side of his game that I hate. Burton does it most out of Adelaide players and as Jars pointed out so did Carey.

You said "In fact there would be dozens more in the AFL now that do it a lot more than him." which implies that he is not diving as much as others. I simply disagree. He would most certainly be in the top 3 in the league when it comes to diving for free kicks.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Couldn't agree more Fakeaneen is one of the biggest divers out there. What really is funny about it is when he gets up after a massive dive with a limp to emphasise the point then a commentator pops up with "OH looks like he might be hurt here!" and funnily enough five minutes later he is fine and everyone at the ground or watching on TV are not one bit surprised.
 
Wangas dives, no argument.

But, on the article, Wanganeen didn't get a free kick for the Gehrig incident, Gehrig had already given away a free which started the scuffle.

And as for Lloyd, his dive against Melbourne in the goal square last year was hardly making a shove appear more forceful, he copped an absolute barrage for that one, worse than Wanganeen is getting this week.

Then Gav gets accused of not hiding his pain enough after Penny dived on his back. Probably faked the back injury picking up his kid that kept him out for a month too.

It isn't that hard to get simple facts right in an article.

Gav still dives.
 
Originally posted by Skippy_14
You mean ****erneen. I HATE him! I DETEST him! I LOATHE him!

I'm sure if he was to make your acquaintance he would feel the same.

Or perhaps you wouldn't even appear on the radar.
 
Originally posted by MrMeaner
Amazing amount of spite for someone I assume that you have never met (correct me if I am wrong). Lighten up, it's only a game.
:rolleyes: As he said
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom