lionbear
Geelong Member from 2016
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2007
- Posts
- 12,778
- Reaction score
- 9,527
- Location
- Reg Hickey Stand Level 2
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- SF 49ers, Cleveland Guardians, Storm
How was Mero's altered?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

must admit it looks good on Aaron SaadThe right option won, in this case. The hoops were a good idea executed terribly; Mero's, while good for what it is, lost all meaning once the club altered it; and option #4 is a dog's breakfast that should never have made the 'final'.
I won't mind seeing this out on the field.
![]()
Collar/cuffs changed for memory to whiteHow was Mero's altered?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Red and blue switched to "not clash with Sydney".Collar/cuffs changed for memory to white
Oh, never mind all that white though!Red and blue switched to "not clash with Sydney".
The side panel design was merely the Gold Coast logo tipped on its side. A creative use of their IP.How was Mero's altered?
Is this another case of the AFL enforcing a white clash policy?
welcome to the AFLFeels like it was majority rigged.
Is this another case of the AFL enforcing a white clash policy?
Let me re-phrase. Is this another case of the AFL enforcing a white clash policy on non-"Big 4" clubs?In which case I'm waiting for Richmond and Essendon to wear a white jumper next season.
I'll still be pushing WCE hard for Peril in 2017. Until the AFL officially says it has to be white, I don't think the supporters will give up - and watch the pitchforks come if the AFL do say it - with Richmond, Essendon, and previously Carlton all having non-white clashes.Let me re-phrase. Is this another case of the AFL enforcing a white clash policy on non-"Big 4" clubs?
Re Suns - who do they need a clash against? Brisbane? Sydney? Wearing a white based jumper v Sydney is not much better than Red. A yellow clash would have made more sense.
Why do Suns need a clash when playing lions, when no clash is used when gws play the swans?
In over a century of soccerball, Aston Villa and Liverpool have almost certainly never played each other in their home kits. I'm not saying you are wrong. However, the customary view seems to support the idea that red v maroon/claret/burgundy is a clash.Pretty sure both the Lions and Suns don't have to wear the clash but both choose to for exposure.
Oh if only...
Didn't every crows supporter own (or still own) a back to back t shirt?
In over a century of soccerball, Aston Villa and Liverpool have almost certainly never played each other in their home kits. I'm not saying you are wrong. However, the customary view seems to support the idea that red v maroon/claret/burgundy is a clash.
As for why GWS vs Sydney isn't considered a clash? The AFL said so. (although it may be the Tradition Showdown Rule which Crows vs PA use, or they deem orange to somehow not clash with red as orange is a light colour and red is not?)
This is speculative, but I'd guess that It's a club decision in Perth.Would be nice if that rule applied in the west - both Freo and WCE wear white clashes in derbies. Although Freo's clash is respectable, I'd much rather see WCE in Royal (or a Peril clash) in an away derby.