Remove this Banner Ad

Non-AFL chat thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter d0gs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
George Hill would be a good fit for T'Wolves.

Like the move for Utah, Rubio is underrated. Will it be enough to get Hayward to re-sign?

Ingles resigning will mean more to Hayward than Rubio. im much more confident now than a few weeks ago. plus jazz will be making one more decent move.

i'll miss g.hill, but not his injuries
 
I still watch the Tour but the other races are better these days.

Liggett had been a horrible commentator for years, so far past it. Glad they've paired up McEwen with Keenen. It's a good match; Keenen's peleton knowledge is off the hook and McEwen is pretty good on the tactical side of things.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I still watch the Tour but the other races are better these days.

Liggett had been a horrible commentator for years, so far past it. Glad they've paired up McEwen with Keenen. It's a good match; Keenen's peleton knowledge is off the hook and McEwen is pretty good on the tactical side of things.
I don't mind Liggett but don't mind the new crew tho. All my facebork friends seem to hate McEwen and Keenen for some reason. Either way I'm watching tdf for an imaginary holiday, and Gabriel Gaté.

Currently holding out for mountain stages on the weekend. Monday productivity looking grim atm
 
Last edited:
Hayward gone, not surprised but the way it came out was crap.
Word leaked out he'd signed with the C's, then his management try & walk it back saying a decision hasn't been made (when it already had) then some crap ghost written article appears on the players tribune site.
 
Just flicked over to the rugby game on the GC between the titans & sharks, those players will need life jackets soon.

The rain atm and water on the ground is unbelievable
 
For those who don't know already, I've recently been appointed to moderating positions on the CMP and Science boards :thumbsu:

If you're into that kind of stuff - ghosts/aliens/illuminati or physics/chemistry/biology - pop in and have your say :)
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Getting drawn into the mechanics of who would beat who in a match and where Serena would be ranked in the Men's game isn't the point.

Men's tennis exists on its own.
Women's tennis exists on its own.

Therefore the achievements and merits of their participants should be measured on the own terms of each sport.

North Melbourne as a football club doesn't exist independently from the AFL, they don't play under a different set of rules with a different physical biology.

I suspect I'm ramming my overly politically correct head into a metaphorical brick wall by continuing to talk about this but why do we need to say 'the greatest female x'. We are all well aware of Serena Williams gender surely? We know form watching her for nearly two decades she is a female who competes against other females. The gender distinction is only made as a way of re-enforcing male superiority, its shorthand for saying 'but if she ever did face a man she'd get crushed straights'.

Haven't read this thread for a while and just coming to this conversation.

I'm of broadly the same persuasion (liberal/leftie, overly politically correct), but I think the problem here is that a lot of interviewers and commentators are starting to ask if Serena can be considered one of the greatest athletes of all time and people immediately think about Ali, Bolt, Jordan, Federer, Pele, Bradman or whoever. We shouldn't look at it through that prism but that's what happens, and then you start to think "well, could she beat the best male tennis players?" and the answer is a resounding no.

Personally I think she can be considered one of the best athletes ever for the reasons you mention above, but I absolutely understand why people react negatively to that suggestion. I think the best way is to flip it on its head and say "well, is a journeyman male tennis player who never broke into the top 100 in the world a better athlete than Serena Williams?" - to which I would guess most people would say no. But if he would beat her in a straight-up match then why is that the case?

FWIW I think she could beat a number of players in the top 700 or whatever McEnroe says, but by her own admission if she played a top men's player it would be 6-0, 6-0 (I think she was referring to Murray when that was brought up in an interview). The problem is how the conversation is framed. I would always look at dominance in their sport, so for me Bolt is higher than Ali, and probably even the others I've mentioned. And that's where Serena comes in, because her record is almost peerless in her sport.
 
Haven't read this thread for a while and just coming to this conversation.

I'm of broadly the same persuasion (liberal/leftie, overly politically correct), but I think the problem here is that a lot of interviewers and commentators are starting to ask if Serena can be considered one of the greatest athletes of all time and people immediately think about Ali, Bolt, Jordan, Federer, Pele, Bradman or whoever. We shouldn't look at it through that prism but that's what happens, and then you start to think "well, could she beat the best male tennis players?" and the answer is a resounding no.

Personally I think she can be considered one of the best athletes ever for the reasons you mention above, but I absolutely understand why people react negatively to that suggestion. I think the best way is to flip it on its head and say "well, is a journeyman male tennis player who never broke into the top 100 in the world a better athlete than Serena Williams?" - to which I would guess most people would say no. But if he would beat her in a straight-up match then why is that the case?

FWIW I think she could beat a number of players in the top 700 or whatever McEnroe says, but by her own admission if she played a top men's player it would be 6-0, 6-0 (I think she was referring to Murray when that was brought up in an interview). The problem is how the conversation is framed. I would always look at dominance in their sport, so for me Bolt is higher than Ali, and probably even the others I've mentioned. And that's where Serena comes in, because her record is almost peerless in her sport.

The same sort of thing annoys me about people calling Mayweather or Mcgregor two of the best fighters ever. I understand the pound for pound point and understand there are weight classes, but people need to realize these are essentially 65kg short people fighting each other. If they fought someone like Ali or Tyson they would get absolutely murdered.

It's the same with comparing Jordan and Lebron and Russell and Bird. They all played different eras so you can't really compare them.
 
I know that it may seem unkind(to us), but I was wondering if our Bulldogs mascot was based on Steve Price's face? I noticed the resemblance this morning while watching some Ch10 show that he was on.

von0h2.jpg
mbn41g.jpg
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I know that it may seem unkind(to us), but I was wondering if our Bulldogs mascot was based on Steve Price's face? I noticed the resemblance this morning while watching some Ch10 show that he was on.

von0h2.jpg
mbn41g.jpg
Steve's ears are bigger
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom