Numbers up for grabs

[Spagger83]

abit of a discusion for the hell of it

THE FOLLOWING NUMBERS ARE AVAILABLE:
3, 6, 14, 15, 17, 22, 30, 37,

MY SELECTIONS WOULD BE:
(although some are into their careers)
3 - heath shaw (move from 39)
6- steele sidebottom
14- chris dawes (move from 31)
15- leigh brown (for no other reason than having brown's in 15 and 16)
17- john mccarthy (move from 27)
22- dayne beams
27- jarrad blight
31- luke rounds

what you think?

 

[Spagger83]

plus in the locker room it would be heath shaw next to alan didak...
actually lets not do that...avoid temptation! haha
just kidding!

 

[donnie5]

#3 Sidebottom
#6 Dawes
#14 Brown
#15 Corrie
#17 McCarthy
#22 Shaw
#27 Beams
#31 Rounds
#37 Blight

 

[Ryan The Man]

I'm feeling a sense of dejavu here.

 

[Spagger83]

#3 Sidebottom
#6 Dawes
#14 Brown
#15 Corrie
#17 McCarthy
#22 Shaw
#27 Beams
#31 Rounds
#37 Blight

yeah i forgot about corrie, let's not give him number 15...i cant remember anyone being any good that has worn it. let's not give that out again i reckon.

troy lehmann in 1992 wasn't bad i suppose! lol

 

[SamIsTheMan]

Blight will actually be asking for number 17, as it was his junior number at Swan Districts. He wasnt too sure of how successful he would be in getting the number, but he definately isnt shy and will be asking for it.

 

[donnie5]

Blight will actually be asking for number 17, as it was his junior number at Swan Districts. He wasnt too sure of how successful he would be in getting the number, but he definately isnt shy and will be asking for it.

well thats a good sign

 

[3066]

plus in the locker room it would be heath shaw next to alan didak...
actually lets not do that...avoid temptation! haha
just kidding!

hahaha very good.

 

[didaka]

I reckon 31 suits Dawes.

Macaffer should get a new number.

 

[Spagger83]

Blight will actually be asking for number 17, as it was his junior number at Swan Districts. He wasnt too sure of how successful he would be in getting the number, but he definately isnt shy and will be asking for it.

well scotty burns isnt easy to replace, so we might retire the number for a year. but then again we didnt do it for bucks, so we shouldnt do it for anyone. going by past years the player gets "their say" in who gets it next eg: caracella to pendlebury, bucks to maxy etc...
but now that burns is already at another club maybe we wont ask him...who knows!!

if we did ask him i reckon he'd give it to mccarthy as he seems the best fit to playing with the nearest amount of "burnsy" in him.

 

[Jabso]

1. Davis
2. Rusling
3. Sidebottom
4. Didak
5. Maxwell
6. Beams
7. Medhurst
8. O'Brien
9. Anthony
10. Pendlebury
11. O'Bree
12. Cox
13. Thomas
14. Goldsack
15. Macaffer
16. N.Brown
17. McCarthy
18. Clarke
19. Wood
20. Reid
21. Wellingham
22. Blight
23. Rocca
24. Lockyer
25. Fraser
26. Johnson
27. Corrie
28. Stanley
29. Cook
30. L.Brown
31. Dawes
32. Cloke
33. Dick
34. Toovey
35. Prestigiacomo
36. Swan
37. Rounds
38. ROOKIE
39. H.Shaw
40. Bryan
41. Dyas
43. Barham
44. ROOKIE
45+ rookies

 

[Sloth]

If a player has a number lower than 40 then he shouldn't be swapping.

 

[Snag Breac]

Numerology aside, does it really matter?

 

[DoubleO7]

Numerology aside, does it really matter?

Yes.

 

[duds0101]

Yes.

Nope.

 

[NT.Thunder]

1. Davis
2. Rusling
3. Sidebottom
4. Didak
5. Maxwell
6. Beams
7. Medhurst
8. O'Brien
9. Anthony
10. Pendlebury
11. O'Bree
12. Cox
13. Thomas
14. Goldsack
15. Macaffer
16. N.Brown
17. McCarthy
18. Clarke
19. Wood
20. Reid
21. Wellingham
22. Blight
23. Rocca
24. Lockyer
25. Fraser
26. Johnson
27. Corrie
28. Stanley
29. Cook
30. L.Brown
31. Dawes
32. Cloke
33. Dick
34. Toovey
35. Prestigiacomo
36. Swan
37. Rounds
38. ROOKIE
39. H.Shaw
40. Bryan
41. Dyas
43. Barham
44. ROOKIE
45+ rookies

And we have a winner
Seconded, Motion Passed