Palmer vs Rioli - attack

[Mitchell Madness]

Part 4. attack refering to ability to find the goals and move forward etc...

Very tough here. Rioli is far superior up forward, but is a small forward, and therefore is going to kick goals.

Palmer great at going forward though...

Going to say Rioli becuase of Bias

 

[Mitchell Madness]

come on guys, chime in. dont be cowards, let your opinion be known

 

[SS_Fury]

this is stupid. Your asking for a poll on who is the best at 'attack'....what is this netball? rioli is a forward, palmer a mid. Therefor as attack=forward movements, rioli is better. Palmer, however, is a better player and does more damage, just not on the scoresheet. So just to annoy you and your obvious intentions on getting everyone to say 'gee rioli is much better up forward' so you can feel a little better about existing in your lonely world, I voted for palmer.

 

[Mitchell Madness]

actually, i created 4 threads on different areas of a both players calibre...

it is the best way to see where people think player A is greater then player B.

Also note, Rioli probably spends abotu 50% of time outside 50.

 

[SS_Fury]

and here i was thinking you would bite....kudos

 

[Team Mo']

haha EPIC FAIL mate!

 

[whoknows]

But Rioli must be better. He spends more time in the forward line!!!11!!

ZOMG!!!!111!