These 2 players are going to be quality players for their respective clubs for many years to come. I'd be interested to know who you guys think will be the better player and which of the 2 you would prefer to see at your club
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
But Roo does run through midfield, he played wing 6 or 7 games this season much to my disappointment, Riewoldt would be the best CHB going round, and Petrie while good isnt in Roo's class.Originally posted by year of the roo
Probably Pavlich because of the fact that he can run through the midfield and North already have a gun CHF (Petrie), so Pavlich would be of more value to North then Reiwoldt. Not saying that he is better, but Pavlich is more what North is lacking then what Reiwoldt could offer.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I understand that he can run through the midfield, but Pavlich does it and does it well. I am just saying that Pavlich is more flexible and versatile then Reiwoldt.Originally posted by Maguire#31
But Roo does run through midfield, he played wing 6 or 7 games this season much to my disappointment, Riewoldt would be the best CHB going round, and Petrie while good isnt in Roo's class.
would u like to show me where i said he'd be the best CHF 'going round'??????? oh ok, the defence rests.Originally posted by year of the roo
I understand that he can run through the midfield, but Pavlich does it and does it well. I am just saying that Pavlich is more flexible and versatile then Reiwoldt.
Oh and Reiwoldt is not the best CHF going around cos Jonathan Brown and Warren Tredrea are still 'going around'.
if roo cant play both ends of the ground than michael voss cant play midfield!!!Originally posted by Beffery
Pav for sure. He's someone who can play both ends of the ground superbly.
Originally posted by mightysainters
Roo has more Stamina than Pav, Roo is a gun.
When he builds more muscle he will be unbeatable. Still in draft camp he still is in the top 5 of all time in stamina. Definantely a better mark than Pav about the same pace and can hold a KP better than Pav
he has tho, not often....Originally posted by Gopies 2002
At present, probably Pav, but just. He is a little harder at it. Also, while Reiwoldt played wing, I am not sure he could start in the middle as Pav has done, and play a true onball role.
That said I would be happy to have either at the Pies.
Originally posted by Gopies 2002
At present, probably Pav, but just. He is a little harder at it. Also, while Reiwoldt played wing, I am not sure he could start in the middle as Pav has done, and play a true onball role.

show e where i say Roo is better than Pavlich???Originally posted by pav_is_god
he's a better KPP than Hird, does that make Roo better than Hird?
and as a KPP yes yes it does!
My bad you said CHB, which IMO is even crazier then me mis-reading what you said. Reiwoldt is not the best CHB going round as he is a KP forward, he could probably play in defence, but he is not better then Leppitsch, hell he aint even better then Prestigiacomo, Lucas, McGregor, Colbert or Harley at CHB (apologies if I have missed anyone).Originally posted by Maguire#31
would u like to show me where i said he'd be the best CHF 'going round'??????? oh ok, the defence rests.
and Riewoldt is much better in midfield than u give him credit for..... and is a better KPP the Pav. That said pavlich is a gun!
Originally posted by Maguire#31
show e where i say Roo is better than Pavlich???![]()
![]()
![]()
and as a KPP yes yes it does!
![]()
