Plagerism, and citing of sources.

[kuepper]

I note with interest in the WCE forum, a thread you promoted through your weekly email, was posted and cited as being from another site, and as is the the correct way, the original author cited his place where it was posted.

It is equally interesting that Bluey saw fit to remove the link to the original source, yet it is A OK for the whole article to remain, without even a mention of it's plagerism.

Is this standard practice for this site, to steal content, then even promote it to the members via an email?

Just interested.

 

[Bluey]

I told you what happened via private e-mail (Adrian is off for two days so I'm answering some of his e-mail).

The initial post was a spam link so it was removed.

Then it was noticed that the content had been posted by another user but the link was mistakenly not put back (I believe the plan was to search for the link on your site but sidetrackage occurred).

I'm getting a bit sick of conspiracy theories...