I note with interest in the WCE forum, a thread you promoted through your weekly email, was posted and cited as being from another site, and as is the the correct way, the original author cited his place where it was posted.
It is equally interesting that Bluey saw fit to remove the link to the original source, yet it is A OK for the whole article to remain, without even a mention of it's plagerism.
Is this standard practice for this site, to steal content, then even promote it to the members via an email?
Just interested.
It is equally interesting that Bluey saw fit to remove the link to the original source, yet it is A OK for the whole article to remain, without even a mention of it's plagerism.
Is this standard practice for this site, to steal content, then even promote it to the members via an email?
Just interested.