ferball
desperately terminally-contrarian
- Jul 24, 2015
- 52,754
- 112,733
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
This is like blaming the theory of evolution for the actions of the eugenics movement.Yes, abusing Marxist conflict theory by altering class to race and combining it with marxist-esque race power dynamics/structures into every single situation, because its use of post-modernism as analytical tool offers nothing practical, is just plain wonderful. They even kept the revolution side of it too. CRT isn't Marxist though, but it launders a lot from it and its lineage trace right back to Critical Legal Studies, which was an offshoot of marxist Critical Theory in the 1930s. The attempt to make it out as an attack on a vague legal definition from the 1980s is from the exact some copybook of true marxism has not been tried yet. It's called praxis.
With a deep sense of sarcasm:
Making everything about skin colour, wonderful, that's never caused any issues ever. We all know MLK's quote on the issue. Real heritage from the civil rights movement there aye, not.
Applying race-centric collective guilt to current and future generations, wonderful, that's never caused any issues either...
Calling an entire race (even through 'white' denotes a number of different ethnic groups) racist is just plain wonderful. Making a person feel like sh*t because they had the sheer nerve to be born with a certain skin colour is going to solve all racism...
Returning race-based segregation, wonderful, that's never caused any issues...
Racial generalisations, wonderful, that's never caused any issues...
The bigotry of soft expectations, that is definitely not based on racial stereotypes and will definitely solve education and salary gaps...
Treating people that they never had a chance because of obscure and undefinable power dynamics is just plain inspiring...
Kendl's, a noted theorist 'inspired' by CRT, quote "The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination is future discriminations," is just plain wonderful...
Using red-guard style struggle sessions in 'diversity and inclusion' workshops, wonderful...
Adopting racial-quotas, wonderful...
Advocating book-burning because they were written by white men, because book-burning has always ended so well...
Tearing down the western-prescribed nuclear family is really going to solve racism and has nothing to do with Marx-esque power structures...
Classing objectivity and timeliness as aspects of white supremacy, yea, because that's totally normal to say.
Using terms like multi-racial whiteness for any 'person of colour' that disagree with CRT, just wonderful...
Any criticisms, call it a dog whistle or simply call them racist without an actual shred of proof.
Imagine actually using the noble cause of anti-racism and abusing it by overtly racist in kind. I have read Bell, Crenshaw, Kendl and co., they are all cut from the same cloth.
You want to defend a set of theories so overtly racist and labels and treats me as a racist purely because of my skin colour, go nuts, but I am done with you and with this thread. It has been made abundantly clear that you have never respected me in the first place if you genuinely believe in CRT's core tenets.
I should have just taken my que and permanently left the site when Sopworths called me a racist for just posting objective facts. Barely anyone here stood up for me or messaged me, not to mention the other misrepresentations and insinuations of racism, sexism and fascism that have accompanied me in these threads from other posters.
Just plain disappointing.
Critical race theory is pretty much anything that examines race as a social construct not a biological one. Its major premise is that the way people think about race is not based in ideas like biology ie black people having dark skin for sun protection reasons, but in social ones ie lazy criminal black people are superpredators and prey on hard working whites so we must use the law punatively in self defense against them.
That last line isn't a pisstake either. Its literally the attitude of US lawmakers and US culture itself less than 30 years ago.








