If he invested wisely he would be almost set up.I'd love to know what job will be available to him that doesn't require him to be vaccinated.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If he invested wisely he would be almost set up.I'd love to know what job will be available to him that doesn't require him to be vaccinated.
The Club will now work closely with the AFL regarding options available to replace Jones’ spot on the list for the 2022 season.
First round priority pick coming up....No surprise that Carlton still aren't totally across the concept of drafting players.
No current season stats available
Centrelink jobseekerI'd love to know what job will be available to him that doesn't require him to be vaccinated.
Wow...
If.If he invested wisely he would be almost set up.
Good on jones for taking a stand.
Wow...
Good on jones for taking a stand.
He definitely got a few more years in the afl than i thought he would when he was a kpf
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
No surprise that Carlton still aren't totally across the concept of drafting players.
Did lol but to be fair, I can see some Carlton supporters arguing that since the AFL were the ones to establish the mandate then it is hardly fair to be left high and dry losing a best-22 player through no fault of the club
Did lol but to be fair, I can see some Carlton supporters arguing that since the AFL were the ones to establish the mandate then it is hardly fair to be left high and dry losing a best-22 player through no fault of the club
Although officially he 'retired' so I don't know what to make of that
Unfortunately (fortunately?) it's not the AFL making the mandate. They are outlining the league parameters - but they are just in line with government mandates.
It's why Vic based players need to be fully vaccinated by 25th of this month, but WA based players have until January.
By that logic we should have hit up the AFL for compensation for losing Rioli for 2 years. We lost a best 22 player through no fault of the club due to an AFL/ASADA rule about tampering with urine samples and not being under the influence of weed on match days. We would have rightfully been laughed out the door if we tried.
End of the day Carlton have no standing here to demand compensation. It will either be an additional late pick in the national draft to replenish the list spot or it might be like the conditional supplementary picks Essendon received when they had to replace the banned 34 for a season.
I get it but I would contend there is a difference between breaking long-established drug rules/protocols and something which is a new matter altogether (presumably not written into contracts?, not actually cheating etc)
No current season stats available
What happened here??