Trades Round 2 trades

[Andrew Birch]

Yeah not sure what to do about Bergman.

I think he will score well but if I bypass H.Jones and then Bergman doesn't play then I'm stuffed!

You'll know if Bergman's been selected an hour before HJones' game starts.

 

[Judd_Magic]

Bergman ain't playing. If he was, the club website would be all over it with Disney and Aliir being named surely.

Yeah you're most likely right but a fool like me can still pray to the supercoach Gods...

 

[Judd_Magic]

You'll know if Bergman's been selected an hour before HJones' game starts.

That is reassuring to know.

 

[Andrew Birch]

Whose your loophole mate?

Did you VC Dusty?

Ha, I wish. My loophole is Mr Here we go, here we go, here we go, Oea! One because he has a cool name and two because I have 4 M/Fs in my forwards and want 3 M/F links on my mid bench for multi swings.

 

[Judd_Magic]

A turd in the hand is worth two in Ken's bush. Or something.
H Jones like kissing your sister, but the JS is rock solid by the sounds.

Always wanted a sister when I was a teenager as I thought it would be a great way to meet chick's. Have 2 bloody younger brothers instead!

 

[Judd_Magic]

Ha, I wish. My loophole is Mr Here we go, here we go, here we go, Oea! One because he has a cool name and two because I have 4 M/Fs in my forwards and want 3 M/F links on my mid bench for multi swings.

View attachment 1081260

View attachment 1081261

Haha, that's a bloody cool name for a campaigner rookie.

I'm still undecided if I want to take a loophole player or not.

 

[Significant]

Ha, I wish. My loophole is Mr Here we go, here we go, here we go, Oea! One because he has a cool name and two because I have 4 M/Fs in my forwards and want 3 M/F links on my mid bench for multi swings.

View attachment 1081260

View attachment 1081261

Surely Jones isn't a better prospect than some of the mid options which have presented themselves Birch! I would be moving Brockman into the forward line and getting rid of Oea and Jones for Jordon. Berry. Gulden. Take your pick. Still keep the swingset with Brockman.

 

[Andrew Birch]

Haha, that's a bloody cool name for a campaigner rookie.

I'm still undecided if I want to take a loophole player or not.

I know there's a school of thought about 30 green lights this year is the % move since our rookies are going to be dropped in Rd2 anyway so we'll have a loophole doughnut or two whether we like it or not.

I disagree with that logic. If one or more of my rookies are dropped, I will correct them with rookies that are playing when they're on the bubble. Besides, those loopholes might not be where I want them to be on the field and may not best serve the purpose of a loophole due to their draw, lack of dpp etc. At least with a designated loophole player, it's on a line you want them to be on, preferably is dpp and doesn't play many early games.

 

[pulpdriver]

Ha, I wish. My loophole is Mr Here we go, here we go, here we go, Oea! One because he has a cool name and two because I have 4 M/Fs in my forwards and want 3 M/F links on my mid bench for multi swings.

View attachment 1081260

View attachment 1081261

That is one hot ****ing forward line.

.

I have those premo gents but on other lines.

 

[Andrew Birch]

Surely Jones isn't a better prospect than some of the mid options which have presented themselves Birch! I would be moving Brockman into the forward line and getting rid of Oea and Jones for Jordon. Berry. Gulden. Take your pick. Still keep the swingset with Brockman.

I have all 3.

 

[Andrew Birch]

That is one hot ******* forward line.

.

I have those premo gents but on other lines.

Thanks man, my Midfield only bats 4 deep though.

 

[Judd_Magic]

Thanks man, my Midfield only bats 4 deep though.

Same here but my forward line still looks like crap!

Will be better when I bring Dusty in next week though.

 

[Judd_Magic]

I know there's a school of thought about 30 green lights this year is the % move since our rookies are going to be dropped in Rd2 anyway so we'll have a loophole doughnut or two whether we like it or not.

I disagree with that logic. If one or more of my rookies are dropped, I will correct them with rookies that are playing when they're on the bubble. Besides, those loopholes might not be where I want them to be on the field and may not best serve the purpose of a loophole due to their draw, lack of dpp etc. At least with a designated loophole player, it's on a line you want them to be on, preferably is dpp and doesn't play many early games.

I have to say that I'm way more comfortable having a loophole player. You could just straight out captain Max Gawn and the campaigner could break his leg or something and score 30 and then you're stuffed while you had Dustys 150 odd as vc and didn't take it.

 

[pulpdriver]

Same here but my forward line still looks like crap!

Will be better when I bring Dusty in next week though.

Didn't start Dusty?

 

[Judd_Magic]

Didn't start Dusty?

Nope, only had Dunkley as a premo forward.

Had the thought in my head that I'll pick the campaigner up when he goes under $500k but I have a bad feeling that's not going to happen this year.

Dusty looks like he is going to a whole new level and I need to get him in now before he scores 200 against the Hawks and is over $600k.

 

[pulpdriver]

Nope, only had Dunkley as a premo forward.

Had the thought in my head that I'll pick the campaigner up when he goes under $500k but I have a bad feeling that's not going to happen this year.

Dusty looks like he is going to a whole new level and I need to get him in now before he scores 200 against the Hawks and is over $600k.

Seems like he's in store for a big year. Like he'll actually turn those DGAF games into games. Could be 110+. God help the rest of us because I don't want him tearing apart my team with his 5 goal bullshit again. **** that.

 

[Lord De Goey]

Henry out to anyone who can beat 9.

 

[pulpdriver]

Henry out to anyone who can beat 9.

Henry to me. I'll do my best.

 

[OhhhhhCyril]

Henry>someone else who isn’t shit
Grundy> some non overpriced hack

amirite Judd_Magic

 

[Judd_Magic]

Henry>someone else who isn’t sh*t
Grundy> some non overpriced hack

amirite Judd_Magic

Henry yes, Grundy give at least 1 more week.

 

[WaynesWorld19]

Ended up going -

H.Young > Sharp
Impey > Fullerton
Daniher > Bergman

$375,500 in the kitty to go Dow > Dusty

Backline -

Lloyd, Laird, Stewart, Short, J.Clark, Sharp (Highmore, Kosi)

Forward line-

Dunkley, Dusty, Ziebell, Warner, Bergman Fullerton (Rowe, Brockman)

Lets say Young, Impey, and Daniher score 10-15 points more than the Rookies you've replaced them with .....let's say that's a combined 40 points over your Rookie choices .....add Dow's 60 and you're still on Dusty's ave

Good chance Bergman is the "vested" player

 

[Judd_Magic]

Lets say Young, Impey, and Daniher score 10-15 points more than the Rookies you've replaced them with .....let's say that's a combined 40 points over your Rookie choices .....add Dow's 60 and you're still on Dusty's ave

Good chance Bergman is the "vested" player

You are like the good angel that sits on my left shoulder mate while the JM devil is sitting on my right shoulder.

 

[SC fish]

No trades*











*TBC

 

[Here2tellyouwhy]

Bergman getting a guernsey after all?
Didn't think he looked like getting the call up in the end.

Bergman not named. Can you choose someone who is?

Port already confirmed that Bergman is starter yesterday.

I don't think they did...

View attachment 1081226

Hartlett has mentioned him in an article as a logical replacement, but they haven't announced him with Orazio and Aliir

It was me kents.

Its me. Ken Oath.

 

[Here2tellyouwhy]

Ha, I wish. My loophole is Mr Here we go, here we go, here we go, Oea! One because he has a cool name and two because I have 4 M/Fs in my forwards and want 3 M/F links on my mid bench for multi swings.

View attachment 1081260

View attachment 1081261

Go on...