Trades Round 9 Trades

[Doggies7]

Rocky of Fyfe?

Fyfe long term. Rocky is great without Wines in the team, but Wines back in a few weeks brings his ceiling down a bit it seems.

 

[Yellow Feathers]

Double downgrade this week. Just need somebody, anybody for Ross.

 

[Thetrader15]

Double downgrade this week. Just need somebody, anybody for Ross.

Brayshaw...oh, did you mean points or $

 

[bettingonbetts]

Wanting to get Zerrett in this week.
I can either do
Drew > Merrett and Petruccelle > Ham (can’t afford anyone else except a 170k)
Or I could do
Petruccelle/Parker>Corbett and Walsh > Zerrett

Only thing is I would rather get rid of Drew and Petruccelle before Walsh...ehhhhh

 

[Petracca]

Currently thinking Brayshaw & Ross -> Dunkley & Danger (stupidly traded him last week)

Alternatively could do Ross & Burgess -> rook & Dunkley (or Danger)

Thoughts? 2nd one probably looks more sensible doesn’t it.

 

[The Joker]

(If he plays) Whitfield will come back in for Brodie Smith and Lockhart for Sam Walsh.

I'll take the potential loss of cash coming in his return game over missing out on a fit Lachie Whitfield against Carlton, did someone say 177 point BreakEven

 

[PAFC27]

What caused Josh Kelly to miss the other week?

 

[Maurice Mitchell]

Iv been hit with 5 injuries this round. Mrouch, Stewart, Ross, Atkins and Scrimshaw.

Pretty ugly.

 

[Shadow89]

Iv been hit with 5 injuries this round. Mrouch, Stewart, Ross, Atkins and Scrimshaw.

Stew should play, wouldn't be too worried about that

 

[JDWCE]

What caused Josh Kelly to miss the other week?

Was a groin complaint

 

[JADED]

(If he plays) Whitfield will come back in for Brodie Smith and Lockhart for Sam Walsh.

I'll take the potential loss of cash coming in his return game over missing out on a fit Lachie Whitfield against Carlton, did someone say 177 point BreakEven

Wing type / running midfielders over last 3 weeks against Carlton
Rd 6. Liam Shiels 145
Rd 7. Trent Dumont 123
Rd 8. Tom Phillips 123

 

[Petracca]

which one fellas:

1) Brayshaw & Walsh -> Dunkley & Duncan (+$200k)
2) Rozee & Walsh -> Dunkley & Duncan
3) Ross & Burgess -> 170k rook & Dunkley (+$100k)
4) Brayshaw & Ross -> Dunkley & Danger

Cheers

 

[Lukesera]

Scrim > 170ker (Bewley?)/C.Taylor
Walsh > Zerrett
123k left to grab Whitfield next week after his price drop

4 rooks left on field
Hore, Stack
Hayes
Baker

 

[burge13]

Walsh to Dunkley then move him forward next week, or Shiels? Not sure Shiels will be a top 10 mid whereas Dunk probably ends as one of the better forwards?

I say this but his role has changed a few times so who knows what Bevo will do; can he be trusted now?

 

[samFFC]

Wing type / running midfielders over last 3 weeks against Carlton
Rd 6. Liam Shiels 145
Rd 7. Trent Dumont 123
Rd 8. Tom Phillips 123

Noooo
Need Whit to work into things and save the cash. Can’t have patient owners being rewarded!!

which one fellas:

1) Brayshaw & Walsh -> Dunkley & Duncan (+$200k)
2) Rozee & Walsh -> Dunkley & Duncan
3) Ross & Burgess -> 170k rook & Dunkley (+$100k)
4) Brayshaw & Ross -> Dunkley & Danger

Cheers

Personally don’t think Brayshaw should be traded especially for someone without clear role and early bye, but I can see the logic.

Duncan very underrated and you get 2 upgrades with that so option 2.

I’m keeping Burgess due to DF swing which should help in the byes!

 

[Yellow Feathers]

Brayshaw...oh, did you mean points or $

Haaaaa... I see what you did there

 

[nob2210]

Who do we think is more of a necessity - Tim Kelly or Josh Dunkley???

 

[burge13]

Who do we think is more of a necessity - Tim Kelly or Josh Dunkley???

Kelly definite keeper. Question marks still over Dunkley but if he keeps his role, also a keeper. I'd target Kelly first

 

[happy_eagle]

I can do Drew to Lockhart and Walsh to Dunkley with not a lot of cash spare
I will wait and see if any good 170k players are named

 

[PAFC27]

Brodie Smith > Nick Hind via Stack DPP.
Jack Ross > Josh Kelly

Holding Walsh another week hoping that with Cripps being tagged he can pick up a few extra points. Allows me to next week go Drew > any rookie and Walsh > another premium

 

[browncow]

Rank in order of importance or point maximisation, or even just what you would do yourself.

I have 5 rookies currently on field.

DEF - 3 of Hore, Stack, Rozee, Duursma.
MID - Walsh
FWD - Miers

I am also running with a Gawn/Witts ruck combo.

1 - Walsh to Merrett/Duncan
2 - Duursma to Laird/Stewart
3 - Witts to Grundy.

 

[dodgie]

Rank in order of importance or point maximisation, or even just what you would do yourself.

I have 5 rookies currently on field.

DEF - 3 of Hore, Stack, Rozee, Duursma.
MID - Walsh
FWD - Miers

I am also running with a Gawn/Witts ruck combo.

1 - Walsh to Merrett/Duncan
2 - Duursma to Laird/Stewart
3 - Witts to Grundy.

Witts to Grundy every day of the week for me

 

[C_Turn]

Ross & Walsh to Dunkley and Answerth (via DPPs Stack & Drew)
This seems very cheeky and because of that i like it
Concerns are having to play three rookies in the mids and Walsh not being one of them, potentially Constable, Stack and Drew (Smith, Hayes bench)

 

[PAFC27]

Rank in order of importance or point maximisation, or even just what you would do yourself.

I have 5 rookies currently on field.

DEF - 3 of Hore, Stack, Rozee, Duursma.
MID - Walsh
FWD - Miers

I am also running with a Gawn/Witts ruck combo.

1 - Walsh to Merrett/Duncan
2 - Duursma to Laird/Stewart
3 - Witts to Grundy.

Rule out 3. You're so close to the byes, stay strong and bring in Grundy after his bye! Then you have a lot of potential to skyrocket through that R13 bye.

As for 1 or 2...I reckon Walsh and Duursma score the same this week, but Duursma's breakeven should remain lower. So in terms of cash generation, Laird. But in terms of scoring/ceiling, easily Merrett for me!

 

[happy_eagle]

Ross & Walsh to Dunkley and Answerth (via DPPs Stack & Drew)
This seems very cheeky and because of that i like it
Concerns are having to play three rookies in the mids without, potentially Constable, Stack and Drew (Smith, Hayes bench)

I'm leaning this way if no good rookies are named. I feel like if a good 170k rookie is named then the $100k you save from that over Answerth is important.