One interesting thing with Boxshall coming in.
Nas, Sincs, Windhager no centre bounce attendances between them.
In the case of Sincs, generally it's a win if we don't have to bring him in. Probably Nas too. And Windhager made good use of his running power on the wing.
Box attended 39%, probably mostly in the first half.
Clark was attending about 30% when he was in the team (seems like a lifetime ago, but was R1,R2). So it shows Clark and Boxshall are playing a similar role there.
Nas and Sincs were attending more CBs in the run of 3 losses we had, in which Jones and Owens were spending a fair bit of time in there too. In other words, Jones/Owens wasn't cutting it against those midfields.
My point is that Boxshall/Clark's role is pretty important structurally for us, freeing up Sincs/Nas to do their thing and allowing us to keep Owens forward (and manage Jones!).
(Sincs did spend time in the guts vs. Adelaide when Clark played, but since then Garcia has moved in there full time)
Nas, Sincs, Windhager no centre bounce attendances between them.
In the case of Sincs, generally it's a win if we don't have to bring him in. Probably Nas too. And Windhager made good use of his running power on the wing.
Box attended 39%, probably mostly in the first half.
Clark was attending about 30% when he was in the team (seems like a lifetime ago, but was R1,R2). So it shows Clark and Boxshall are playing a similar role there.
Nas and Sincs were attending more CBs in the run of 3 losses we had, in which Jones and Owens were spending a fair bit of time in there too. In other words, Jones/Owens wasn't cutting it against those midfields.
My point is that Boxshall/Clark's role is pretty important structurally for us, freeing up Sincs/Nas to do their thing and allowing us to keep Owens forward (and manage Jones!).
(Sincs did spend time in the guts vs. Adelaide when Clark played, but since then Garcia has moved in there full time)









