Sam Mitchell or Daniel Harris?

[Philhawk]

Let's end the debate once and for all.

Mitchell by the length of Flemington for mine.

 

[WeneedyoungJarmans]

who's Daniel Harris?

 

[Strapping Young Lad]

Could any possibly pick Harris above Mitchell?
Perhaps Flag Man or Lidge....?

 

[dipper86]

Could any possibly pick Harris above Mitchell?
Perhaps Flag Man or Lidge....?

You also forgot Tas ! sad really.

 

[cs61]

But they shouldn't really be in a poll though. Mitchell is miles ahead and looks like captaining Hawthorn next year. Harris is improving and handy around the clearances, but Mitchell is in a superior class IMO.

 

[Herbs hawks]

Daniel HaHaHaHaHarris ,

Sam Mitchell, bye a massive massive margin.

 

[Babe Ruth]

The vote is unanimous now get this **** off

 

[Vinnie Vegas]

Can I vote 4 times for Sam Mitchell?

He's at least that many times better.

 

[Strapping Young Lad]

The vote is unanimous now get this **** off

You've obviously never seen any of the threads where North supporters claimed Harris to be better than Mitchell.

 

[hilly]

You've obviously never seen any of the threads where North supporters claimed Harris to be better than Mitchell.

So therefore Harris = Dud?

 

[Philhawk]

So therefore Harris = Dud?

Where did anyone say that? ...

 

[Babe Ruth]

Where did anyone say that? ...

Harris = Battler
Mitchell = Good Player

 

[Philhawk]

Harris = Battler
Mitchell = Good Player

Not true. This thread wasn't made to deride Harris - in fact I think he is a very good player - but I believe Mitchell is in the Top 20 players in the competition.

 

[hilly]

Where did anyone say that? ...

Posts 2, 6 and 8 would go close. And that's how BigFooty works anyway.

 

[Strapping Young Lad]

if someone was to post that "Chris Judd is miles ahead of Jude Bolton" does that mean they are saying bolton is a dud?
I don't think so.

 

[mark73]

Mitchell? Is he that guy everyone seems to want to punch in the balls? Not a dud, but in no way better than Harris.Part of the tanking actually.There couldn't have been any other reason why he didn't have the guy who bitchslaps him everytime shading him.Spud must've been wondering himself.

 

[Philhawk]

Mitchell? Is he that guy everyone seems to want to punch in the balls? Not a dud, but in no way better than Harris.Part of the tanking actually.There couldn't have been any other reason why he didn't have the guy who bitchslaps him everytime shading him.Spud must've been wondering himself.

Sweet ****, you're accusing others of tanking after your fine performance last weekend?

 

[Strapping Young Lad]

So we've had 5 North supporters vote so far.

 

[Hard Ball Get]

Mitchell by so far its not even funny.
Harris is not even in the same world as Mitchell.
Mitchell is in the top 50 in the comp. Harris no where near it.

 

[94_Eagles]

Harris is getting unfairly bagged in this thread, he's a great little in and under player and one of my favourites to watch.

Having said that you'd have to vote Mitchell.

 

[JerryWexler]

Harris for me, had the better of Benny for most of our game against them.Mitchell is just a slightly more talented, less physical version of Philip Read.When the Roos get their midfield sorted for the future, Harris (damage wise) will leave Mitchell for dead.

Lock it in.

 

[Roosurgence]

I can't believe it! Its the first time that I actually agree with the Dawks.

Daniel Harris is a good player, but Mitchell has the edge on him.

 

[The Zebra]

Harris for me, had the better of Benny for most of our game against them.Mitchell is just a slightly more talented, less physical version of Philip Read.When the Roos get their midfield sorted for the future, Harris (damage wise) will leave Mitchell for dead.

Lock it in.

mmmmmm, despite averaging 7.4 less possessions (26.6 to 19.2), Harris averages more contested possession (4.2 to 2.8) more 1%ers (5.2 to 4.5) and more tackles (6.0 to 5.0).

Fatarse Mitchell is ahead ATM, but he just throws it onto his boot to often for mine and as Jerry Wexler said Harris will end up the more damaging player.

Plus Harris looks like a much, much better bloke.

Sammy has a head you'd like to kick (and really small, sensitive nuts apparently)

 

[DG-Man]

Poor comparison. Harris is ok, not fair for him to be compared against the extracter!

It's like those Buckley vs Hird debates. makes Buckley look like an a$$, but he's still a good player!

 

[Strapping Young Lad]

Fatarse Mitchell is ahead ATM, but he just throws it onto his boot to often for mine....

As opposed to Daniel 'the floater' Harris?

Good to have you here though Zebra, your mumblings are sure to bring a few laughs.