Remove this Banner Ad

Save essendon Group

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

blumfieldisback

All Australian
Oct 4, 2005
909
0
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
next years premiers, dons
honestly what a joke, what are they dissapointed about, sheeds time was up although i think melbourne should have employed him his time had come to an end, we needed someting fresh.

and now they are calling an EGM what a waste of time and money after 108 signatures from 30,000 members??????????????????????????????????????????
 
If I was an Essendon member Id support the removal of Jackson and Horsborough, they have absolutely botched this season and are setting the club up on a road to nowhere.

Essendon need to get competent board members and administrators in place ASAP.
 
If you heard this clown speak on the radio (SEN Earlier) he wants an apology to sheedy and sheedy to get recognition from essendon, also wants him to have a job at the club.

Now that is a way that we can get Bomber/laidley/choco to the club keeping sheedy in the background.

These people need to get over themselves and think with their head not heart. I liek others was dissapointed when sheedy was not renewed and the way that is has been handled but watching his coaching moves over the last 6 weeks think we made the right decision, we have been dissapointing for 4 years now. If it wasnt a coach who had been there so long he would have been gone and everyone would be happy. The coaching efforts against Richmond, 3 quarters of WCE, Hawthorn and countelss others this season has ben very ordinary with selection being a major problem.

Handling the departure of someone who has done so much for the club was always going to be hard. I think the board and essendon have rectified that over the last 2 weeks, he will be immortalised at essendon and it will come in time.

If sheedy is so great why didnt carlton or melbourne want him.......... why dont most richmond supporters want him (they are happier with wallett and his 10 year plan).
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

If I was an Essendon member Id support the removal of Jackson and Horsborough, they have absolutely botched this season and are setting the club up on a road to nowhere.

Essendon need to get competent board members and administrators in place ASAP.


But your not so who cares, you support the filth and eddiewood
 
If I was an Essendon member Id support the removal of Jackson and Horsborough, they have absolutely botched this season and are setting the club up on a road to nowhere.

Essendon need to get competent board members and administrators in place ASAP.

wait a minute pal, botched the season how?????? if they had of re-appointed sheeds none of this conjecture would have raised an eyebrown yet next year we wouldnt be any better on field!!! since jackson's appointment essendon has gone strength to strength off field, remember roger hampson????? we lost draft picks because of it.

Granted horsborough doesnt look very media savvy but after that infamous meeting what was he meant to tell the media, 'yes we have sacked kevin sheedy', he tried to keep it in house thats all, yet he gets rediculed.

what happens if they net mark thompson would u be upset then? your entitled to your opinion but look at the facts, sheedy had to go sometime, it had been 6 years since we were a serious contender thats a long time and we are probably another 2-3 years away from contending again. The fact that melbourne or no other club is in a big rush to get Kev almost vindicates essendons decision, i just wish we did it last year to snare Mark williams.

and we still have off field power with one of the best CEO in the AFL.
 
If I was an Essendon member Id support the removal of Jackson and Horsborough, they have absolutely botched this season and are setting the club up on a road to nowhere.

Essendon need to get competent board members and administrators in place ASAP.


You have once again shown your lack of knowledge on our club.

You let your hatred of us blind you to the facts and the truth

Thank you for your correspondence it has been forwarded to the relevant department.

rb.jpg
 
wait a minute pal, botched the season how?????? if they had of re-appointed sheeds none of this conjecture would have raised an eyebrown yet next year we wouldnt be any better on field!!! since jackson's appointment essendon has gone strength to strength off field, remember roger hampson????? we lost draft picks because of it.

Granted horsborough doesnt look very media savvy but after that infamous meeting what was he meant to tell the media, 'yes we have sacked kevin sheedy', he tried to keep it in house thats all, yet he gets rediculed.

what happens if they net mark thompson would u be upset then? your entitled to your opinion but look at the facts, sheedy had to go sometime, it had been 6 years since we were a serious contender thats a long time and we are probably another 2-3 years away from contending again. The fact that melbourne or no other club is in a big rush to get Kev almost vindicates essendons decision, i just wish we did it last year to snare Mark williams.

and we still have off field power with one of the best CEO in the AFL.

Agree with all your comments above, and these so called saviours are doing nothing but detering us from attracting the best coach and allowing the boards decsion to be proven correct.

Jacksons reign has been very successful and helped us become one of the melbourne power houses. Whilst Horsburgh behind the scenes has generated large sponsorship money and invested it heavily for future benfits, least he showed enough balls to take the roll on, when if we remeber Mckissock stood down at the end of last year as the board knew this decision needed someone that had a history of making such tough decisions. Who care if he doesnt present well in front of a camera.

For the best interest of our Football club all memebers need to put an end to this faceless group and vote for the current board so we can move on.
 
My point is you continually make incorrect statements.

Listen Merv if you have a difference of opinion with what I believe that is fine but dont pretend different opinions are factually incorrect.

If you are going to claim people are factually incorrrect you really should point out where and how this is the case and present facts that disprove what has been put forward.
 
Listen Merv if you have a difference of opinion with what I believe that is fine but dont pretend different opinions are factually incorrect.

If you are going to claim people are factually incorrrect you really should point out where and how this is the case and present facts that disprove what has been put forward.

When i need your advice on how i post i will be no longer for BF.

I am not pretending about anything.

You stated something on the main board that was incorrect, i pointed it out, you changed the subject i pointed it out again, you didn't respond to that issue again

You made incorrect statements above, i pointed out you were wrong again.

No pretending there.
 
When i need your advice on how i post i will be no longer for BF.

I am not pretending about anything.

You stated something on the main board that was incorrect, i pointed it out, you changed the subject i pointed it out again, you didn't respond to that issue again

You made incorrect statements above, i pointed out you were wrong again.

No pretending there.

What am I wrong on ? I recall you disagreeing with me before but not you pointing out something that was actually factually incorrect ?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

If you don't like the Essendon FC constitution, change it, don't whinge like a bunch of girls because you don't like what other members are doing.


These people at Save Essendon are only doing this because they feel the board has not acted in the best interest of the EFC and it's members, if you disagree with them you can have your say under the constitution.


It is always easy hang shit on someone, than do something yourselves.

:rolleyes:
 
If you don't like the Essendon FC constitution, change it, don't whinge like a bunch of girls because you don't like what other members are doing.


These people at Save Essendon are only doing this because they feel the board has not acted in the best interest of the EFC and it's members, if you disagree with them you can have your say under the constitution.


It is always easy hang shit on someone, than do something yourselves.

:rolleyes:

I dare say if and when this EGM is held, the amount of proxy votes held by the Board and the amount of people set to rock up on the night will see this vote defeated massively.

Yes there is probably going to be change in December at the AGM itself - but, even there, there's only a minimum of 2 sapots and a maximum of 4 spots available to be filled.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

If you don't like the Essendon FC constitution, change it, don't whinge like a bunch of girls because you don't like what other members are doing.


These people at Save Essendon are only doing this because they feel the board has not acted in the best interest of the EFC and it's members, if you disagree with them you can have your say under the constitution.


It is always easy hang shit on someone, than do something yourselves.

:rolleyes:

Would much prefer to know who they are, then we could really hang shit on them. We could personally have a go at all 108 of them, only take an hour. Why don't you tell us where the next Primary School meeting is an we can go down with offerings of Fairy bread.
 
If you don't like the Essendon FC constitution, change it, don't whinge like a bunch of girls because you don't like what other members are doing.


These people at Save Essendon are only doing this because they feel the board has not acted in the best interest of the EFC and it's members, if you disagree with them you can have your say under the constitution.


It is always easy hang shit on someone, than do something yourselves.

:rolleyes:

well im no member and havnt been for 8 years, the club made the right decision, didnt the same mebers vote the board members in the first place??? and our constitution needs to be changed, we now have 30,000 members yet we only need 100 signatures to get a EGM, rediculous to the miculous. if they could only get 108 signatures i'd be surprised if they will overhaul the board, the only thing they will do is cost the club money.

just get on with it, silly people
 
There is going to be an egm.

The board will spill the beans and explain why Sheedy was sacked. That will be the end of it.

I don't want to generalise, but the people who despise the people who made the decision and the people in "Save Essendon" seem to be elitist "higher tier" members and mainly older members. The club is bigger than any individual, even Sheedy. How much sugar did they want the board to put on the sacking of Sheedy? Any sacking of a person is a brutal and ruthless affair, let alone the sacking of a club legend. I fail to see how they could have handled this better without compromising the needs of the Essendon Football Club. I say Save Essendon from stupidity.
 
If you don't like the Essendon FC constitution, change it, don't whinge like a bunch of girls because you don't like what other members are doing.


These people at Save Essendon are only doing this because they feel the board has not acted in the best interest of the EFC and it's members, if you disagree with them you can have your say under the constitution.


It is always easy hang shit on someone, than do something yourselves.

:rolleyes:

Ah mate....settle down - I was only asking the question so I actually could voice my opinion....I'm comfortable with anyone doing it - but I want more information....i want to be able to ask some questions before I support, or deny support....
 
well im no member and havnt been for 8 years, the club made the right decision, didnt the same mebers vote the board members in the first place??? and our constitution needs to be changed, we now have 30,000 members yet we only need 100 signatures to get a EGM, rediculous to the miculous. if they could only get 108 signatures i'd be surprised if they will overhaul the board, the only thing they will do is cost the club money.

just get on with it, silly people

Is this a matter of your constitution or the Corporations Act? Because under the act I think only 5% of voting members (you may only have 2,000 voting members, but I doubt it) is needed to call a meeting.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Save essendon Group

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top