- Oct 3, 2008
- 7,401
- 7,881
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
The 50m penalty for it is harsh.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Hardly. Your fellow cat fan is vociferously defending Selwood saying that he didn't play for frees when all evidence points to the contrary. Calling out bs is not trolling.Certain Richmond trolls turning another neutral post into a Geelong obsession post. Just can’t help themselves
Sure. You can’t help yourselves. It’s patheticHardly. Your fellow cat fan is vociferously defending Selwood saying that he didn't play for frees when all evidence points to the contrary. Calling out bs is not trolling.
And the first comment was initiated by an Eagles supporter. So calm down chief.
You of all people accusing Richmond supporters of being Geelong obsessed and pathetic. Talk about projection and lack of self awareness.Sure. You can’t help yourselves. It’s pathetic
Totally this. As soon as the player with the footy steps off laterally to the mark it's play on, even if the ump isn't quick enough to alert the player on the mark.I voted yes because at the moment it is not working.
I am all for keeping the stand rule if umpires also start enforcing players actually having to take the kick over the mark instead of allowing them to creep 2-5metres the left or right.
Certain Richmond trolls turning another neutral post into a Geelong obsession post. Just can’t help themselves
The game is so much more watchable and high scoring...The stand rule helped make the game much more watchable.
If player has indicated to umpire they are having a shot for goal man on the mark should be able to move as much as he wants as this is clearly not going to hinder ball movementThe game is so much more watchable and high scoring...
Didn't last long, did it?
I wonder what the next stupid rule will be to artificially inflate the scoring and give Channel 7 their much-needed ad breaks
Increase the 50m penalty to 100m ???
The game is so much more watchable and high scoring...
Didn't last long, did it?
I wonder what the next stupid rule will be to artificially inflate the scoring and give Channel 7 their much-needed ad breaks
Increase the 50m penalty to 100m ???