Roughies Boys
Cancelled
- Nov 19, 2009
- 7,767
- 2,464
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Dawes is a spudDawes isnt a ruckman![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Dawes is a spudDawes isnt a ruckman![]()
do you mean play with Roughie, Buddy, Hale & Max all in the same team?didn't the pies win a p/ship with
Cloke ,Dawes, Brown & Jolly
we have
Roughie, Buddy, Hale & Max
just a thought
Could depend on who we are playing. Strong ruck divisions might require a stronger ruckman, which may mean Bailey.
yep didn't brown play as a forward and second ruckdo you mean play with Roughie, Buddy, Hale & Max all in the same team?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
It has to be Hale , I say that with a hint of resentment....I was ready to stone him half way through the year....the added responsibility of taking first ruck has been a breath of fresh air......he has been nothing short of very good the past 6 weeks.
Bedsides the point, Bailey has typical ruck brain fart syndrome.....he did a hospital pass to Birchall that could have put him out for the year...back to the reserves son.
This makes sensePast convention always dictated two rucks where required to win a flag. I think the modern game has changed this thought.
Although it looks increasingly unlikely we will play the Eagles in Sept action I have no doubt Clarko will want to prepare for all eventualities and test every line-up variation.
Therefore we need to ensure we can play with two rucks so I think we will test this theory in rounds 20 and or 21 when we have the suns and port.
didn't the pies win a p/ship with
Cloke ,Dawes, Brown & Jolly
we have
Roughie, Buddy, Hale & Max
just a thought
Before the sub was introduced.yep didn't brown play as a forward and second ruck
Its obvious that Hale is our number 1 ruck at the moment in Clarko's eyes as he should be, Clarko is just getting games under Bailey's belt so when finals come around we have 2 legitimate ruck options in case of injuries. Hale's form would need to drop off significantly for him not to be in our starting 22!
Not even up for debate at this stage, Hale by a long, long way.
hahahahahahaha classic!
Paul Salmon would like a word with you.Full credit to Hale that he is considered better than Bails. I dont buy this Hale is a better forward option. Rucks do best when they drift forward and kick a goal. As permanent forwards ruckmen have always failed, cant see this changing in the near future.
Good point, and we're lucky in that we'll get a chance against both teams before the finals start. If both players are fit I reckon Clarkson may play both against Swans & Eagles just to see how each of them performs against their opponents.Swans also have Mummie and the Canadian bloke, Mike Pike.
We might need reinforcements verses the Swans. I do not want their middfield having the benifit of a ruck advantage.
We need Bailey and Hale to be ready when we need them and we might need them against the Swans and Eagles.
Four games on the trott are enough to see how Max will go before we have to face the two teams with better rucks than Hale and Rough.