hazzap
Draftee
G'day folks just wondering who you guys thought would be a better asset to your team. Matthew Stokes or Cyril Rioli?
i think Stokes but there is a few who disagree.
i think Stokes but there is a few who disagree.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

System Upgrade - Search is back! - Post feedback.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Stokes. Still massively underrated, absolute gun.
Made the Dream Team.
Will push All Australian selection.
Rilo is probably more skilful in general terms, but Stokes is hard and tough and always gives his best. Cant ask for more then that.
He's the complete package.I would take Stokes but agree that right now in the team it might not make a whole lot of difference. Stokes is very good above his head, what is Rioli like?
I'll take Stokes thanks.
Rioli i think we forever stay a small forward. Stokes can match it with the big boys in the middle.
More versatile and will proove to be more consistent over his career.
Stokes easily
The suggestion of Jr Roly Poly v Varcoe is more sensible
Rioli has already had midfield rotations this season. Once he develops his aerobic stamina, he'll be given even greater responsibility in the midfield.
and anyway, besides colour, why exactly are they being measured against eachother??

