Stuart John McMaster - Child Murderer

[Tim the Toolman]

I am filthy on this piece of trash:

"A Melbourne man who bashed to death his girlfriend's five-year-old son has been jailed for 13 years.

Stuart John McMaster, 30, subjected Cody Hutchings to brutal bashings to discipline the child and the attacks became more frequent in the weeks leading up to his death, the Victorian Supreme Court heard.

On the last day of his life, on March 25 last year, Cody had been hit up to 25 times in attacks that were savage and cruel, Justice David Harper said."

13 years is not enough for this filth. I'm sick of hearing cases like these from supposed human beings who find it in their will to appropriate and inflict so much pain to a defenceless child.

I hope he gets his in prison and we're not seeing a 40 year old out on the streets in 10 years time as he deserves to rot in hell.

I invite anyone on this site to defend this shit at their peral.

 

[- PC -]

Re: Stuart John McMaster

1. What is the maximum sentence?

2. What sentence would you prefer?

 

[Tim the Toolman]

Re: Stuart John McMaster

He murdered this boy, obviously copped a bargain plea and he was being sentenced for Manslaughter which gets a much lesser sentence.

Again, he murdered this defenceless child, murdered, not by poison, or a bullet to the head but a long abusive smashing, an absolute smashing.

His sentence should be life inprisonment, no parole, no benefits. This animal deserves life.

There's my answer.

 

[Tim the Toolman]

Re: Stuart John McMaster

Oh, I forgot to add this little gem:

"An autopsy revealed 160 bruises on Cody's body and two fractures to his skull, the court heard."

Great work Stuart, just lerv your work. Hope the boys are waiting for you in jail prick.

 

[WA ROO]

Re: Stuart John McMaster

Oh, I forgot to add this little gem:

"An autopsy revealed 160 bruises on Cody's body and two fractures to his skull, the court heard."

Great work Stuart, just lerv your work. Hope the boys are waiting for you in jail prick.

No way will this moron go into general prison population
Mores the pity

 

[Tim the Toolman]

Re: Stuart John McMaster

The thing I don't get is why do these women allow these monsters to move in with them? Are they so desperate for a **** that they'll let anyone in?

It seems to always be the bloody defacto, stepfather syndrome and yes I have read the studies based on our animal instinct to eradicate our competition i.e. sons of others so our gene pool lives on; but fair dinkum.

Obviously I get so upset with cases like this and I will make it my business to bring these cases to the public's attention at any given opportunity from now on. There are obviously people on this site with way too much time on their hands so I ask if anyone could provide a list of murderers like this scum who've done what he has done please?

 

[King Corey]

Re: Stuart John McMaster

1. What is the maximum sentence?

2. What sentence would you prefer?

1. 20 years

2. Guess

 

[Qsaint]

Re: Stuart John McMaster

The judge described how McMaster prepared for his role as the household disciplinarian by modifying a belt to become a heavy strap.

It was designed to better beat this "very young and defenceless boy".

McMaster had become the "strap man" in the family. Few present in the court will forget the words Cody is said to have used as he pleaded in vain for mercy: "Don't call the strap man, dad."

McMaster beat Cody again and again. The post-mortem examination found more than 160 bruises on his body.

It is hard to comprehend how such a small body can carry so many signs of brutality, so much evidence of so many crimes.

The bruises were everywhere: on Cody's head, neck, chest, abdomen, arms, legs, penis and buttocks. But there was more, much more: a gash to the forehead, a tear in the mouth, two skull fractures, a torn liver, and a "shearing tear" to the mesentery, the structure that holds the internal organs in place.

The internal injury that caused Cody's death was probably inflicted days before he died.

On the day he died, this already dying boy was hit 20 to 25 more times in "savagely cruel" attacks.

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22251147-5000117,00.html

His atrocities are outlined on this page, but it is some indication of the horror that a mortician involved in the case described it as the worst in his 10 years of observing violent death.

So traumatised were mortuary staff they worked in teams to try to ease the pain.

The mortician, who did not want to be named, said she had once dealt with a person trampled to death by a horse.

The injuries to Cody were "far worse".

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22251148-5000117,00.html

 

[Magnum]

Re: Stuart John McMaster

1. What is the maximum sentence?

2. What sentence would you prefer?

1. 20 Years
2. Death...

 

[Murray]

Re: Stuart John McMaster

Just relax a little and wait for the OPP to appeal

 

[Qsaint]

Re: Stuart John McMaster

Just relax a little and wait for the OPP to appeal

Assistant DPP holds little hope of a longer sentence 10 years is well above the average. Using a recent court of appeal case whilst 20 years is the Max effectively 13 years is the Max and recently hardly anyones got 10 years.

 

[Murray]

Re: Stuart John McMaster

Assistant DPP holds little hope of a longer sentence 10 years is well above the average. Using a recent court of appeal case whilst 20 years is the Max effectively 13 years is the Max and recently hardly anyones got 10 years.

I guess we shall see

 

[Qsaint]

Re: Stuart John McMaster

I guess we shall see

Maybe, they probably won't appeal.

 

[dan warna]

Re: Stuart John McMaster

i can only visualise something like that one of my kids, and if someone did that to them I'd kill them.

 

[mellowyellow]

Re: Stuart John McMaster

I hope the prick gets some special jail justice.

 

[Chief]

Re: Stuart John McMaster

The judge described how McMaster prepared for his role as the household disciplinarian by modifying a belt to become a heavy strap.

It was designed to better beat this "very young and defenceless boy".

McMaster had become the "strap man" in the family. Few present in the court will forget the words Cody is said to have used as he pleaded in vain for mercy: "Don't call the strap man, dad."

**** I am almost going to be sick.

I have always been against capital punishment, but so help me my resolve in that regard is being tested.

 

[AndSmithMustScore]

They should chemically castrate the ****er.

 

[Chief]

An eye for an eye leaves everyone blind, but I can't say I would be too outraged if he met with a violent accident. I'm only human.

Then I read that the first jury couldn't agree on a murder charge. What did they see or hear that we haven't? One can assume shifty defence arguments about mitigating circumstances or doubt about intent. Who knows?

 

[skilts]

An eye for an eye leaves everyone blind, but I can't say I would be too outraged if he met with a violent accident. I'm only human.
QUOTE]

An eye for an eye also implies that to take this mother's worthless life in some way creates a compensation for the life he took. The law at all levels can be seen as an attempt at compensation either to 'society' or to the victim. The measuring of sentences takes on the look of a commercial transaction when you say, "You've done this, therefore in return, we'll do this to you". To evaluate the worth of his life as being commensurate with that of the boy is a gross insult to the memory of the boy. Measure and weigh. Evaluate and compare the values of entities. So cold. So calculating. So inaccurate.

Let's call a spade a spade. The wish to kill this man has nothing to do with the boy. It's about the anger felt by the readers of pulp newspapers who've been agitated into a frenzy. If it were decided to kill this man, in full acknowledgement that it was for this reason it was being done, I'd be much more comfortable than I am with the bullshit excuse of an eye for an eye. If you want him killed, at least be honest about the reasons. It's the very same blood lust to which this imbecile succumbed, only the blood runs somewhat more frigidly in this case.

 

[Rocket23]

An eye for an eye leaves everyone blind, but I can't say I would be too outraged if he met with a violent accident. I'm only human.
QUOTE]

An eye for an eye also implies that to take this mother's worthless life in some way creates a compensation for the life he took. The law at all levels can be seen as an attempt at compensation either to 'society' or to the victim. The measuring of sentences takes on the look of a commercial transaction when you say, "You've done this, therefore in return, we'll do this to you". To evaluate the worth of his life as being commensurate with that of the boy is a gross insult to the memory of the boy. Measure and weigh. Evaluate and compare the values of entities. So cold. So calculating. So inaccurate.

Let's call a spade a spade. The wish to kill this man has nothing to do with the boy. It's about the anger felt by the readers of pulp newspapers who've been agitated into a frenzy. If it were decided to kill this man, in full acknowledgement that it was for this reason it was being done, I'd be much more comfortable than I am with the bullshit excuse of an eye for an eye. If you want him killed, at least be honest about the reasons. It's the very same blood lust to which this imbecile succumbed, only the blood runs somewhat more frigidly in this case.

Very well written Skilts.

For what its worth I always like to look at it this way:

What value or good is this man EVER going to bring to society?

I and alot of others would answer none. So what right has he got to live in society.

 

[Chief]

An eye for an eye also implies that to take this mother's worthless life in some way creates a compensation for the life he took. The law at all levels can be seen as an attempt at compensation either to 'society' or to the victim. The measuring of sentences takes on the look of a commercial transaction when you say, "You've done this, therefore in return, we'll do this to you". To evaluate the worth of his life as being commensurate with that of the boy is a gross insult to the memory of the boy. Measure and weigh. Evaluate and compare the values of entities. So cold. So calculating. So inaccurate.

Of course. Which is why I said "an eye for an eye leaves everyone blind". It isn't valid. Me being a father and imagining my own son in that situation doesn't make me an expert on the best way to deal with this murderer. However at the same time if something bad befell this prick, or any like him, it's not at the top of my priorities to pause and shed a tear. My rational brain doesn't want him killed. Locking him up does make it impossible for him to harm another kid during that time.

Skilts do you have children?

It's the very same blood lust to which this imbecile succumbed, only the blood runs somewhat more frigidly in this case.

I don't equate the instinct or desire for retribution with the sadistic torture of a child. Not at all. Perhaps they are both a form of lashing out, I'll give you that.

 

[thenorthernpole]

Disgusting pig of a bloke.

They should puit the mum away as well for bringing such a scumn into the house.

The kids dad must be furious and who could blame him

 

[jumpinjimmy]

An eye for an eye leaves everyone blind, but I can't say I would be too outraged if he met with a violent accident. I'm only human.
QUOTE]

An eye for an eye also implies that to take this mother's worthless life in some way creates a compensation for the life he took. The law at all levels can be seen as an attempt at compensation either to 'society' or to the victim. The measuring of sentences takes on the look of a commercial transaction when you say, "You've done this, therefore in return, we'll do this to you". To evaluate the worth of his life as being commensurate with that of the boy is a gross insult to the memory of the boy. Measure and weigh. Evaluate and compare the values of entities. So cold. So calculating. So inaccurate.

Let's call a spade a spade. The wish to kill this man has nothing to do with the boy. It's about the anger felt by the readers of pulp newspapers who've been agitated into a frenzy. If it were decided to kill this man, in full acknowledgement that it was for this reason it was being done, I'd be much more comfortable than I am with the bullshit excuse of an eye for an eye. If you want him killed, at least be honest about the reasons. It's the very same blood lust to which this imbecile succumbed, only the blood runs somewhat more frigidly in this case.

Top poste Skilts His karma awaits we don't need to provide him company.

 

[Richo83]

If I ever wanted this man killed, it wouldn't be the frenzy you describe Skilts. I don't want this man killed, I don't believe in cp, but my biggest reason for if I did want this man killed (the best reason I can think of) is to protect society from these types and also ensure that he never, ever comes back.

Lets look at this rationally, as you say. This man obviously is dangerous, obviously psychotic and shows no mercy or restraint. This man shouldn't be in society, at the worst he should get all the time in jail. Simply because it protects society from these types.

When I ever have kids, I pray that a person like this never comes close.

 

[GhostofJimJess]

**** I am almost going to be sick.

I have always been against capital punishment, but so help me my resolve in that regard is being tested.

That's about where I'm at too, Chief. I literally felt nauseated at reading this.

An eye for an eye also implies that to take this mother's worthless life in some way creates a compensation for the life he took. The law at all levels can be seen as an attempt at compensation either to 'society' or to the victim. The measuring of sentences takes on the look of a commercial transaction when you say, "You've done this, therefore in return, we'll do this to you". To evaluate the worth of his life as being commensurate with that of the boy is a gross insult to the memory of the boy. Measure and weigh. Evaluate and compare the values of entities. So cold. So calculating. So inaccurate.

Let's call a spade a spade. The wish to kill this man has nothing to do with the boy. It's about the anger felt by the readers of pulp newspapers who've been agitated into a frenzy. If it were decided to kill this man, in full acknowledgement that it was for this reason it was being done, I'd be much more comfortable than I am with the bullshit excuse of an eye for an eye. If you want him killed, at least be honest about the reasons. It's the very same blood lust to which this imbecile succumbed, only the blood runs somewhat more frigidly in this case.

Brilliant post, skilts. If it's purely for retribution that we capitally punish this lowlife then I could never justify it. But if it's to prevent such an event ever recurring, or to provide a deterrent to other potential brutalities inflicted upon innocents, then I'd have no issue with ending his life.

If I ever wanted this man killed, it wouldn't be the frenzy you describe Skilts. I don't want this man killed, I don't believe in cp, but my biggest reason for if I did want this man killed (the best reason I can think of) is to protect society from these types and also ensure that he never, ever comes back.

Lets look at this rationally, as you say. This man obviously is dangerous, obviously psychotic and shows no mercy or restraint. This man shouldn't be in society, at the worst he should get all the time in jail. Simply because it protects society from these types.

Yep. Ditto that. At the very least a maximum security confinement for the rest of his miserable existence. Give him plenty of time to realise the disgusting errors of his life, and hopefully force him to wallow in his remorse.

Not that it particularly relates to this case, I also strongly believe that parole board's should be held legally responsible for the crimes committed by those who offend while on early release from previous crimes. Make the suits accountable for their judgemental errors, just like those in the health, construction and other industries.