FlyingBurittoBro
Club Legend
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2011
- Posts
- 1,063
- Reaction score
- 210
- Location
- Space
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions

- Other Teams
- broncos
How could you disagree with this premise? Several people in this very thread have stated that they have abstained from suicide due to the people they believe they will 'leave behind'.
I've already posted a link to a very useful wiki page for anybody interested in anything to do with life/death.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idealism
Basically, it seems to me that the only way that one could fear the 'consequences' for their loved ones of their passing is if they believe in a dualistic conception of their own existence. That is, they believe the 'universe' is something distinct from them, something which existed more or less as it is before they were born and will exist more or less as it is once they are dead.
I find such a conception of ones existence utterly absurd, and it still surprises me somewhat that seemingly-intelligent people can buy into it if they have given the matter any real thought (pun not intended).
Before you ask how else one could conceive of their own existence, read that link above. The tl;dr is that an alternative belief to the dualistic framework posited above is that our relationship with the 'universe' (which includes our loved ones) is entirely codependent (for want of better word). As radical as it might sound (especially to those who have never attempted to study ontology), some people - and this includes me - believe that what we know as the 'universe' is entirely dependent on our own subjective experience and therefore the idea that there is anything to be 'left behind' should we 'disappear' is unintelligible on a number of levels.
Before any turkeys come along and try to tear down anything I have written above (as it is a very brief explanation of a very deep topic), I will be more than happy to continue the minutiae of this tangent in the conversation in a dedicated thread. What I have posted above is simply meant to aid people like ppg05 who probably had no idea what the hell I was talking about in my earlier post. I'm not even in the ballpark of expert ontologist but I think what I posted above is a sufficient explanation (of my own beliefs) for this thread.
if fairdinkum kills himself we all disappear?





