- Jun 22, 2005
- 4,218
- 2
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Steven Gerrard
Should be a good game. Win or lose.Fletchers Girl said:West Coast haven't lost a game in Melbourne this year.
*touch wood* playing collingwood this week![]()
![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Should be a good game. Win or lose.Fletchers Girl said:West Coast haven't lost a game in Melbourne this year.
*touch wood* playing collingwood this week![]()
![]()
embleygirl said:Should be a good game. Win or lose.
Just the same as if any of the other 'leading' clubs lost. I think you only notice the anti-WC threads. Fact is it happens to a lot of clubs. And, rather amusingly, some of these threads are actually started by WC fans.Arcadion said:Again, if the result was reversed last night, the main board would be flooded with anti-WC threads. You can't deny that RogerRabbit69.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
A bit up yourself there are you champ?triplegee said:Sydney get beaten at home and there's not much talk about it.
If it were to happen to the Eagles there'd be 20 threads dominating discussion on these boards. And they'd all be saying the same thing..
Just goes to show how paranoid about the Eagles BF posters are.
I bet you don't. You obviously haven't in the past.Arcadion said:OK, I'll remember that.
triplegee said:Sydney get beaten at home and there's not much talk about it.
If it were to happen to the Eagles there'd be 20 threads dominating discussion on these boards. And they'd all be saying the same thing..
Just goes to show how paranoid about the Eagles BF posters are.
There are plenty of anti-Collingwood threads when they lose as well. Oops, there goes that theory of me only seeing anti-WC posts!RogerRabbit69 said:I bet you don't. You obviously haven't in the past.
Could you possibly fathom the concept that you pay a whole lot more attention to threads concerning West Coast threads (which is totally understandable)?
BTW, how can you explain the thread where people were asked to list the clubs from most to least-favourite?
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showthread.php?t=249845
Or just choosing to skim over that because it doesn't suit your anti-WC theory?
Arcadion said:There are plenty of anti-Collingwood threads when they lose as well.
Jarryd_S said:Because Sydney don't play at Telstra Stadium 12 times a year. Simple really.
Telstra Stadium seems to suit the Swans too, bit more room for Goodes and coJF_Bay_22_SCG said:They might next year mate. The SCG is getting redeveloped. Why bother going to games in a construction zone when you have a perfectly ecent stadium that remains generally pretty available 15 km away.
I'm sure if the Swans chose to play all our games at Homebush next season they **** Souths or West Tigers off elsewhere. Because we draw more than double their crowds put together.
JF
Bestbird said:True
But on the positive
A top 2 finish almost guarantees a Grand Final appearance based on the teams home record in recent years.
More so than any other side
And home ground advantage means little in Grand Finals
larrikin said:Telstra Stadium seems to suit the Swans too, bit more room for Goodes and co
How would Swannies fans feel about a permanent move?
On topic, I agree with Bunsen Burner. We do seem to have our share of tool supporters
it would suit goodes and hall and a couple of their other big mobile types, but their overall style of play is a tough, in close and checking one. surely thats helped with a small ground.larrikin said:Telstra Stadium seems to suit the Swans too, bit more room for Goodes and co
How would Swannies fans feel about a permanent move?
larrikin said:How would Swannies fans feel about a permanent move?