Ok then Sport. My Collingwood stats aren't good enough for you.
http://afltables.com/afl/stats/coaches/coaches_idx.html
Go to the above website then list the coaches according to grand finals. From a quick look there is about is like 3 or 4 coaches that managed to get to a GF after having coached 134 games with out having already got to a GF. Almost all coaches that have gone on to be coaching greats in the history of VFL/AFL appear to have got to at least a GF in their first 134 games.
We ain't getting a flag in the next 2 years, so are you advocating that we invest a further two seasons (at least 44 games) in a bloke who ain't got to finals in 4 years?? Seriously, by the end of the 2019 season Bucks will have coached 180 games for no GFs.
Now you look on that web link I recommended you go have a look at and you find me 10 coaches on that list that coached 180 games for no GFs that went on to win premiership glory... actually, I'll make it easy for me 3 coaches in VFL/AFL history that went 180 games for no GFs and ended with a cup. I'd say there is only one to buck the trend so to speak and that's probably bomber Thompson. Maybe Walls and Malthouse was around the 150 mark.
So 1 out of 51 coaches to win a flag has coached 180 games with out a flag to then get one (I think bomber was around 185ish). You so sure about that 2 extension for Bucks now Sport old buddy old pal.
Realistically, best case scenario for this club is to enter the premiership window in 3 years. So if Bucks is the man your giving him 205 games just to get to a GF. That's insane. And based on all VFL/AFL coaches never happened, and never has any coach gone 204 games without a GF to win a flag.
Stop deluding yourself. Come out of the dream world your living in. Stop buying the snake oil eddie's been selling ya. He will never coach us to a flag end of story
sport you're making the case not me - go and do your own homework and comeback and convince the rest of us.
PS: By challenging you're statements and premise of your argument I'm not supporting Bucks - I'm simply challenging the veracity of your conclusions based on the the data.








