You try to make a point about parity in a supercars thread. But the series has such a poor history managing this and applying fair rules. That if you continued on you'd end up looking as dumb as an F1 fb poster.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Got some examples of these unfair rules only to ford?You try to make a point about parity in a supercars thread. But the series has such a poor history managing this and applying fair rules. That if you continued on you'd end up looking as dumb as an F1 fb poster.
93 was before my time of taking an interest.Well, it started in 1993. Ford teams produced the better car over the Holdens, winning the first 12 heats and 6 rounds overall before being gutted with the front splitter prior to rd7 in Mallala. Holden then won 5/6 remain heats and 2/3 rounds outright. This change was particularly advantageous at Bathurst, Holden filling the top 4 in qualifying and top 5 in the race...
...
This then led to the lack of action over the advantage the VX Commodore had over the AU Falcon. Which Holden reaped the benefit of success for many years prior to begrudgingly having to change the specifications with project blueprint for 2003...
...
This then leads to 2019. When after complying with the rules and being checked off. The specifications of the Mustang have to be fundamentally changed to their disadvantage.
In a parity series, I've never heard CoG phrase being used before. It's invented.
There was a good article in auto action about this how the mustang was built for the single spring and the holdens are not looking forward to see the next new 888 car goes.It wasn't Penske, it was Scotty up the front. The biggest thing was the Mustang was developed with the single spring, the Opels are playing catch up with that.
Ducks or Cape Barron geese?Bloody hell those ducks almost got s**t-mixed !!!
They were greyDucks or Cape Barron geese?