There was a gap on the previous frame.That was the very next frame. What the **** are you on about?
Two frames out.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
There was a gap on the previous frame.That was the very next frame. What the **** are you on about?
Yeah you can put stuff on your bat so snicks don't show up.No it doesn’t
It’s worse and it doesn’t always work
The one in Perth? Pretty sure we reviewed and he basically walked on some pretty thin evidence. Commentators saying that wouldn't have been overturned on that evidence.Alyssa Healy with a great point hahaha, he reviewed earlier in the series when he hit the cover off it
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
One of my fav players to watch, unbeatable at his peak.Only one wicketkeeper,
AB de Villiers, has ever achieved the combined feat of scoring a century and taking at least five catches in the same Test match.
To save time we should just ask the batsman, or maybe don’t even bother with that. If he walks he is out, if not he isn’t.Hmmm...not sure on that one
The first replay on Fox clearly showed it deviating after it went past the toe.I think it's hit the toe and if there wasn't the shenanigans from snicko with Carey yesterday no one would question it
What? Carey's decision showed a noise two frames before the ball had even reached the bat. This one showed a clear sound the immediate frame after the ball passes the bat. The Smith decision is crystal clear as it has been for years.That's a disgraceful decision particularly after the Carey decision. Sniko is a botched system. Spend more money and get better technology....
The one in Perth? Pretty sure we reviewed and he basically walked on some pretty thin evidence. Commentators saying that wouldn't have been overturned on that evidence.
Yeah you can put stuff on your bat so snicks don't show up.
$$$Everyone else uses Ultra Edge, I have no idea why we are still using Snicko
Carey said he hit it.Ph my god has everyone gone completely mad with this review system.
Carey didn't hit it.
It hit the glove and carried to Khawaja
Smith has hit it again (and it clearly carried).
Why has every commentator and umpire gone insane.
The question is if the noise is something else other than the ball contacting something.What else was it hitting? His head or something? That spike is literally bat it’s not complicated
The ball hadn't even reached the bat on the previous frame. It's not that complicated, the sound was between then, and after it had passed the bat (which was the next frame).There was a gap on the previous frame.
Two frames out.
Watching live I wasn’t sure. Probably I was affected by the earlier one whicc I thought had carried but adjudged to not haveSo, the umpires sent that up because they didn't know if it's carried??? If that's the case, we have a far bigger problem because that carried easily. And it should have forced a review from England.
FWIW, I thought it hit end of the bat.
And not for the first time this series.Smith is deluded
Carey said he hit it.
Yeah, it’s the Poms that are whingers …..Stfu Gilchrist you peanut. He's smashed the toe of his bat. Carey knew it clearly. Can't stand this fake confected drama to make the poms feel better. Oh listen to me and my non bias sickwning commentary. He's such an arse licking hack.
Had a water cooler discussion about this earlier - I assume that Ch7 and Fox share broadcast responsibilities in one manner or form, but who supplies the hardware?Does Seven run worse cameras than Nine did?
Again he didn't.Carey said he hit it.
Like some kind of Vaseline??Yeah you can put stuff on your bat so snicks don't show up.