Mega Thread The Flat Earth Mega thread.

[NEGAN]

the definition of 'simple' did not change

going @ 670568000 mph , maybe more, heaps of different directions. Any yet not feeling any of it, nor being able to prove earths motion via science isnt simple at all ...

its a vastly complete which flys in the face of said razor



yet its the same for string theory, gravity, various space theories

there being various 9/11 explanations, doesn't not mean that 9/11 went down exactly as the authorities insist it did .

Difference being though if I ask 3 round earthers how do we stay on the planet I know what answer I am going to get. ( Granted there is holes in gravity I will give you that)

I ask a flat earther how we stick to a flat earth model and well it's a box of chocolates.

 

[darthbards]

that's nice

There's a thread about it on the science board.

 

[cannot]

Difference being though if I ask 3 round earthers how do we stay on the planet I know what answer I am going to get. ( Granted there is holes in gravity I will give you that)

I ask a flat earther how we stick to a flat earth model and well it's a box of chocolates.

it identical... ask 3 scientists (real ones lol, that are good at said field) how the theory of gravity works and you may get three different answers.

i dont mean to consistently 'pick' on gravity but some of the new information on that topic is really interesting

i think you are being somewhat harsh on the 'flat earth community' for not having a completely unified theory. religion, science and other aspects of life seem to be the same on occasion

 

[Judd2Sewell]

There's a thread about it on the science board.

I'll check it out. What I would give to know what would happen if you go into/through one.

 

[Werewolf]

Will discuss when the round earthers can provide factual proof for Gravity,an unedited photo of globe earth and footage of the WHOLE earth spinning as has been requested numerous times previously.

Video of the Earth from 42.30 to 54.20, taken from a distance of about 50,000km


Video of the Earth from 23.00 to 30.40 and 37.10 to 44.25, distance of 65,000km


Video of the Earth from 13.25 to 24.40 and 36.30 to 41.00, distance of 200,000km

 

[darthbards]

Video of the Earth from 42.30 to 54.20, taken from a distance of about 50,000km


Video of the Earth from 23.00 to 30.40 and 37.10 to 44.25, distance of 65,000km


Video of the Earth from 13.25 to 24.40 and 36.30 to 41.00, distance of 200,000km

How come are there no stars?

 

[NEGAN]

it identical... ask 3 scientists (real ones lol, that are good at said field) how the theory of gravity works and you may get three different answers.

i dont mean to consistently 'pick' on gravity but some of the new information on that topic is really interesting

i think you are being somewhat harsh on the 'flat earth community' for not having a completely unified theory. religion, science and other aspects of life seem to be the same on occasion

You don't get it.

It's your job as a flat Earther to make it a better theory than the round Earth model.

The flat earth theory poses great questions to doubt aspects round earth for sure. But as far as changing a belief system it's not even close. It's not even unified.

 

[cannot]

How come are there no stars?

 

[Tiger71]

Just the other day I believed I was going to be served pork belly with a red wine reaction and apple sauce.
That night I was serves pork belly with both a red wine reduction and apple sauce for dinner.
I hadn't told anybody what I wanted for dinner that night nor was I told what was going to be presented to me for dinner that night. Spooky stuff indeed.

Wow

 

[darthbards]

You don't get it.

It's your job as a flat Earther to make it a better theory than the round Earth model.

The flat earth theory poses great questions to round earth for sure. But as far as changing a belief system it's not even close. It's not even unified.

Did you read up about viewing into the horizon form the book I referenced you to?

 

[cannot]

You don't get it.

It's your job as a flat Earther to make it a better theory than the round Earth model.

The flat earth theory poses great questions to doubt aspects round earth for sure. But as far as changing a belief system it's not even close. It's not even unified.

i guess that is one way of looking at it

Wow

makes me hungry tha post

Did you read up about viewing into the horizon form the book I referenced you to?

is it unified ?

 

[darthbards]

Wow

The post you quoted was to show that evidence is different from proof. A bit of context please.

 

[Judd2Sewell]

How come are there no stars?

It's quite easy to imagine that the camera technology was not too good back in those days, and thus when it is focused on the earth the camera is taking in all of the reflected light - making it hard to take in the light reflected from the spherical stars millions of light years away in the background.

In the dead of the night light some candles and place them a few hundred metres behind your car. Turn your car's lights on, facing you. Look at the headlights and then tell me if you see the candles well in the background.

 

[darthbards]

i guess that is one way of looking at it



makes me hungry tha post




is it unified ?

Not sure if it's unified. doubt it,nothing seems to be,in most theories.

That other post makes me hungry also lol

 

[NEGAN]

Did you read up about viewing into the horizon form the book I referenced you to?

Not yet, I will though mate I promise.

Your the first person I will tag.

 

[cannot]

It's quite easy to imagine that the camera technology was not too good back in those days

oh boy

 

[Santoz]

How come are there no stars?

Google says our eyes are more sensitive to light than photographic film.

 

[darthbards]

It's quite easy to imagine that the camera technology was not too good back in those days, and thus when it is focused on the earth the camera is taking in all of the reflected light - making it hard to take in the light reflected from the spherical stars millions of light years in the background.

In the dead of the night light some candles and place them a few hundred behind your car. Turn your car's lights on, facing you. Look at the headlights and then tell me if you see the candles well in the background.

You want me to perform a candle burning experiment now?
I'll see how I go,I'm guessing the kids will love that one so it might be fun.

 

[Santoz]

oh boy

Let's not cherry pick mate.

 

[Judd2Sewell]

You want me to perform a candle burning experiment now?
I'll see how I go,I'm guessing the kids will love that one so it might be fun.

Not sure it's worthwhile doing it now, given it's daylight (assuming you're living in Aus?).

Try it sometime. Take a picture with the camera focused on the car lights, I'm willing to bet you won't see the candles in the background.

 

[Werewolf]

How come are there no stars?

(1) It's daytime and (2) stars are tiny anyway. The ratio of Earth's diameter to distance varies from 1/5 to 1/20 in the above videos. The next nearest star is 4 light years away, so the ratio of an average star diameter to distance is more like 1 to 100,000,000

And yes, Star Trek is fun to watch, but it's not scientifically accurate in depicting space travel

 

[Judd2Sewell]

Let's not cherry pick mate.

What's to cherry pick... What am I missing?

 

[darthbards]

Not yet, I will though mate I promise.

Your the first person I will tag.

No need to promise,if you don't get round to reading it,it's no skin of my nose.
Just google the fist page of the chapter I said,it seemed to have a bit of info and a fair few diagrams

 

[Santoz]

What's to cherry pick... What am I missing?

Just grabbing parts of people's responses.

Not you.

Cannot.

 

[darthbards]

Not sure it's worthwhile doing it now, given it's daylight (assuming you're living in Aus?).

Try it sometime. Take a picture with the camera focused on the car lights, I'm willing to bet you won't see the candles in the background.

Lol,I didn't mean now now, of course I'll perform the candle burning experiment at night.