- Aug 6, 2024
- 6,565
- 14,382
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Eng cricket, Leics CCC, Leicester Tigers
Broady might have had a few tests for aus but he’d have been dropped after a handful because he didn’t take enough wickets.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I can certainly believe this, it's pretty much what I expected.I have been told this by a couple of people in cricket circles that Stuart Broad was a great bloke and had time for everyone. His old bowling partner Jimmy Anderson was the total opposite.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
It definitely used to be out, Adam gilchrist famously walked if he thought he was out. Now with ball tracking technology being used a batsman might start walking off, the screen says not out and he comes back to resume his innings.I don’t mind a bit of cricket but am no expert
Question :
If a batsman walks and the umpire doesn’t signal out what happens ?
Is it some unwritten gentleman’s rule that it’s considered out ?
Morning Steve
totally agree on broads 2013-14 series . i seen a couple test live and he gave his all every spell as the poms crumbled around him .Stuart Broad. Going back to the 2013-14 Ashes series, people were booing him for not walking in a previous series, but that doesn't bother me. I believe batsmen bat, bowlers bowl and umpires are there to make umpiring decisions. So, I don't care if a batsman waits for an umpire give him out.
But back to the 2013-14 series, I loved the way Broad just kept roaring in to bowl, no matter what the situation, and he was ultra-competitive in a 0-5 series, which I admire. What really won me over was an interview he did in the Test after Johnson clobbered him on the foot and left a massive bruise. Johnson had just got Broad again in the same fashion, Broad joked that Johnson was aiming for the same spot. It was refreshing, no bullshit, just have a joke and move on.
He reminded me of Darren Gough, always competitive and played the game in the right spirit.
Just wearing my baggy green what's up?
Didn’t he wear it to Wimbledon like an absolute knob?Just wearing my baggy green what's up?
Sounds on brand for StevenDidn’t he wear it to Wimbledon like an absolute knob?
Pure flog.
I assume he hams it up for his 'sporty' night stories, but he said that refusing to wear his cap that day was one reason he never played another Test:I'd love to ask Flem about him
Also a fella named Brett Lee destroyed the indians on debut bowling 150 clicks and Gillespie and McGrath were better.I assume Fleming hams it up for his 'sporty' night stories, but he said that refusing to wear the cap was one reason he never played another Test:
“So, I rock up to the bus and everyone's got their Baggy Greens, except for Shane Warne, Mark Waugh and myself. Steve Waugh was not happy that everyone hasn’t worn the Baggy Green. "
"So there’s got to be ramifications. He couldn't drop Shane Warne. Not again. I think he (Steve) worked out that didn’t go down very well." He can’t drop his brother Mark Waugh. What would that be like at Christmas lunch? “So, someone has to go and it’s the big-nosed Victorian. Not the smartest thing I ever did. I never played another Test.”
The Baggy Green error that (questionably) cost Fleming his Test career
Shane Warne and Mark Waugh were also involved.archive.sen.com.au
yep, and wasn't Fleming never quite the same after his shoulder injuries? At least that's what he reckons, for memoryAlso a fella named Brett Lee destroyed the indians on debut bowling 150 clicks and Gillespie and McGrath were better.
Kaspa was also really good on the subcontinent if I remember correctly
If you choose to walk, then your out. Doesn't matter if the Ump hasn't made a decision.It definitely used to be out, Adam gilchrist famously walked if he thought he was out. Now with ball tracking technology being used a batsman might start walking off, the screen says not out and he comes back to resume his innings.
It would normally be given out. Having said that though, there was an incident involving Graeme Watson back in the 1970s. He was playing for Western Australia and was on about 150 at the time. He considered he nicked one and walked off the ground. However, the umpires at the time considered he wasn't out, and at the next break went to the official scorers and changed the dismissal from "caught" to "retired out".I don’t mind a bit of cricket but am no expert
Question :
If a batsman walks and the umpire doesn’t signal out what happens ?
Is it some unwritten gentleman’s rule that it’s considered out ?