The off topic thread

[Dirty Bird]

Massive day for my work tipping comp today. 6/6 so far this round, 9/9 + the 2 bonus points you get for tipping all correct would put me back into 1st and in prime position to win the mullah.

Got Adelaide, the Dogs & West Coast. Should I make any changes? Worried about all 3 tbh.

Ditto me.
What was your margin on FNF?
I was off by 2.
Probably my best tipping round ever.
But Im expecting one of the Dogs or Eagles to **** it up.
Have minimal confidence on West Coast.
And only went Dogs as Saints sucked last week. If the good Saints turn up. It'll blow it all up.

 

[ilikepotatoes]

[QUOTE="SM, post: 34454897, member: 66951"]I was on Freo.

Got Lions today hopefully they can do something.[/QUOTE]
Bad luck.
We got screwed.

Poor Tommy Lynch, hope he's alright.

 

[Dirty Bird]

Now, why I just came into this thread.

Was just thinking something and wanted to ask it.

Didn't think it deserved its own thread, and I didn't know whereelse to put it, so thought Id ask here.

Say we were heading into EPL matchday 38, 1st and 2nd were playing each other and tied on points. Both 3+ points clear of 3rd.

Would the FA schedule it to be a sand alone match, or go with the traditional all at once route?

Due to it's importance I'd consider giving it a standalone fixture. But it would set a precedence, so perhaps I would leave it as is.

 

[Flameboy]

Ditto me.
What was your margin on FNF?
I was off by 2.
Probably my best tipping round ever.
But Im expecting one of the Dogs or Eagles to **** it up.
Have minimal confidence on West Coast.
And only went Dogs as Saints sucked last week. If the good Saints turn up. It'll blow it all up.

3. Tipped them by 15.

Fully expecting one of these last two to let me down.

 

[SM]

Now, why I just came into this thread.

Was just thinking something and wanted to ask it.

Didn't think it deserved its own thread, and I didn't know whereelse to put it, so thought Id ask here.

Say we were heading into EPL matchday 38, 1st and 2nd were playing each other and tied on points. Both 3+ points clear of 3rd.

Would the FA schedule it to be a sand alone match, or go with the traditional all at once route?

Due to it's importance I'd consider giving it a standalone fixture. But it would set a precedence, so perhaps I would leave it as is.

No. All at once.

 

[Shoei]

Now, why I just came into this thread.

Was just thinking something and wanted to ask it.

Didn't think it deserved its own thread, and I didn't know whereelse to put it, so thought Id ask here.

Say we were heading into EPL matchday 38, 1st and 2nd were playing each other and tied on points. Both 3+ points clear of 3rd.

Would the FA schedule it to be a sand alone match, or go with the traditional all at once route?

Due to it's importance I'd consider giving it a standalone fixture. But it would set a precedence, so perhaps I would leave it as is.

It's only happened once before:

"The final match of the 1988–89 English Football League season was contested on 26 May 1989, between Liverpool and Arsenal, at Liverpool's Anfield ground. By sheer coincidence, it was the match between the top two teams in the First Division and the teams were close enough on points for the match to act as a decider for the First Division Championship"

But to answer your question it would be played all at once.

 

[Shoei]

Oh and ****ing Eagles supporters

Priddis has 42 touches, 9 tackles and 12 clearances yet people still think he's our weakest player

 

[Redalert]

Oh and ******* Eagles supporters

Priddis has 42 touches, 9 tackles and 12 clearances yet people still think he's our weakest player

He's underrated by a lot of supporters, sure his disposal isn't great but at least he wins the ball.

 

[ilikepotatoes]

Oh and ******* Eagles supporters

Priddis has 42 touches, 9 tackles and 12 clearances yet people still think he's our weakest player

He cops a lot of unfair flack.

 

[Shoei]

He's underrated by a lot of supporters, sure his disposal isn't great but at least he wins the ball.

Yeah his disposal isn't the best but it's not nearly as bad as people make it out to be.

Seriously, nearly 250 pages of "How much longer can Priddis be played" name me one other player from a club that gets so much criticism.

 

[Tulip]

Actually it does.

Has to do with the memory it requires to have the 20 stadiums on the one game (plus all the other ones it includes).

Not to mention, they won't upgrade games on their old consoles. They want to make you go buy a new one.

FIFA was the last PS2 game ever.

 

[Redalert]

Yeah his disposal isn't the best but it's not nearly as bad as people make it out to be.

Seriously, nearly 250 pages of "How much longer can Priddis be played" name me one other player from a club that gets so much criticism.

Have West Coast supporters seen the rest of your midfield? Who the hell could they possibly bring who'd be better than Priddis?

 

[Latro]

Have West Coast supporters seen the rest of your midfield? Who the hell could they possibly bring who'd be better than Priddis?

He is holding them back apparently.

 

[Shoei]

That's the gist of it!

Priddis is holding back the development of our midfield!

NFI what that actually means.

People are jizzing themselves over the performances of Shuey and Gaff after today, saying "Oh but if we had two Shuey's instead of Priddis..." failing to comprehend that the fact that they even get the ball in the first place is because Priddis is doing all the hard work in the bottom of the packs.

Yes he's not the most talented midfielder and is prone to butch some disposals but he can't be faulted for his efforts.

 

[jod23]

Priddis is a superstar. Absolute workhorse who just finds the footy again and again. All other WC fans who think he is shit and is holding our midfield back simply know nothing about football. If he didnt play, we would be up shit creek.

Hold us back? He hold's it all together.

 

[Cruyff14]

Anybody catch 60 Minutes last night?

This baby Gammy saga is absolutely sickening.

 

[Cruyff14]

John Legend's tone is ****ing magnificent. Absolutely ****ing MAGNIFICENT.

 

[chef]

Anybody catch 60 Minutes last night?

This baby Gammy saga is absolutely sickening.

Yep, what a creepy fella.

 

[jod23]

John Legend's tone is ******* magnificent. Absolutely ******* MAGNIFICENT.

Yeah he is a bit ridculous.

 

[jod23]

Also just this guy....

 

[glenferry23]

Anybody catch 60 Minutes last night?

This baby Gammy saga is absolutely sickening.

Not fully across the details, just following it on and off. But I heard something about the father having a history of sexual assault or something like that? Is that true?

 

[Jatz]

Not fully across the details, just following it on and off. But I heard something about the father having a history of sexual assault or something like that? Is that true?

Yep.

Disgusting he can worm his way around that and still acquire a kid.

 

[Cooldude]

The whole saga's a disgraceful cluster****, so many things that shouldn't have been allowed to happen

 

[Cruyff14]

Also just this guy....

Yes, Corby is great. Very talented song writer and musician.

(I have chills listening to this Corby song)

HOLY SHIT THIS IS AMAZING. WOW.

Did you check out Legend's cover?

 

[jod23]

Yes, Corby is great. Very talented song writer and musician.

(I have chills listening to this Corby song)

HOLY SHIT THIS IS AMAZING. WOW.

Did you check out Legend's cover?

Yeah that performance of Runaway is unbelievable. The bloke is just crazy talented. All his songs are tied to him and he sings them with such emotion that you dont just listen to the song, you feel it. He's pretty amazing.

I did listen to the Legend cover. The dude is balls deep also.