manureid
Laziest Poster on Figbooty
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2003
- Posts
- 51,237
- Reaction score
- 85,294
- Location
- Deleted Threads
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Man United,Raiders
You were rating competitions, not individual players ability. The Brazilian league is not even close to the standard of leagues you had it ranked above and part of the reason is, as you state, all the good Brazilian players, dont play in it. I don't think anyone is arguing that Brazil porduces incredible talent. So in stead you should be ranking 'football talent' by country. Not leagues.This is because there more money in in those countries, and Brazil have an abundance of players to choose from, I could grab a 2nd rated players from Brazil and stick them in the A-league that would embarrass these teams.
I could say take out all the non Brit's in Chelsea and what are you left with? You cant buy your way into the World Cup.
If you are all going to base Brazilian standards on one game, then how come then Argentina held them to 1-0 in the final. One would have expected easy win by Germany. Once in a while teams capitulated....does that ring a bell! That will never happen again in our lifetime, and if it did, it wont be Brazil.
Watching that game, the Brazilians were there own worst enemy, with out Nemar. I don't want to steer you away from my comments which I standby, because that's my opinion, as you have yours.
If the Brazilian League standard is so low, then why is it that so many players are playing in Europe, is that because they come from a poor league, and if they did, why are they selected? You have to learn your craft somewhere. Brazil is a poor country, in money terms, however its the richest country in football talent.
Even though Germany are the World Cup champions, Brazil are still King of the World Game.









