raman
Kind of a Jagger-Tarzan
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2005
- Posts
- 27,106
- Reaction score
- 80,435
- Location
- Enemy terriroty
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Betting markets react to where the money is laid, above all.
If I had to bet my life on it right now I'd say Trump will win, but it's no $1.22 proposition.
I agree with much of this, however there is not a snowballs hope in hell that Republicans would pass a tax on religious organisations (Christian ones at least).No way. Rubio was a cancer - he couldn't even win his home state of Florida.
It was important to put up Trump because he is rightly or wrongly seen as a disruptor. Sanders was the answer to Trump but the Denocrats thought that they could control the narrative through the media.
Of course, I believe the whole thing has been a massive set up from the beginning because there are certain bits of key legislation that need to pass that would be considered ideologically opposed to a Democratic candidate.
For example, a tax on religious organisations (which would effectively kill organised religion in the US since most of them are in it for the money) would never pass with Clinton.
With Trump, however...he's just crazy enough to do that sort of thing.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Losing all 3 atm. Needs a miracle from here!It's all about Michigan and Wisconsin now. If Clinton loses one of them, she must perform a miracle in Arizona. If she loses both, she loses. If she wins both, she wins.
Well, change could also mean by pulling the trigger on the nukes and that would be a drastic change there. Right now given the current global political climate, steady is probably better than change.
But you can't hold them in isolation. Its exactly the opposite of that. They're running against each other in an election.
Either you legitimately don't care which one wins or you pick the lesser of 2 evils (as almost every election has been since the dawn of time)
It's like a Crers v Wobbles grandfinal. It's a lose/lose situation.
I don't really get this line of thinking. Trump may be a lot of things but a militarist isn't really one of them.
"I would bomb the shit out of 'em. I would just bomb those suckers."I don't really get this line of thinking. Trump may be a lot of things but a militarist isn't really one of them. If anything he's been making noises about winding back NATO and it's push further east towards Russia and building ties with Russia, which is the complete opposite to Clinton.
BOMB THE SHIT OUT OF THEM
BLOW UP EVERY SINGLE INCH
It's all just a big joke for the internet and comedians to pick apart.![]()
Its like Hilary's regime has killed no one ever. The country has been at war for the past 30 years killed millions and yet trump is the mass murdering phsyco.I don't really get this line of thinking. Trump may be a lot of things but a militarist isn't really one of them. If anything he's been making noises about winding back NATO and it's push further east towards Russia and building ties with Russia, which is the complete opposite to Clinton.
I agree with much of this, however there is not a snowballs hope in hell that Republicans would pass a tax on religious organisations (Christian ones at least).

If by `people' you're including outside Bigfooty, not everyone is a white guy hey.It's sort of funny that people think the apocalypse is nigh.
It's all just a big joke for theinternetABC andcomediansThe Project to pick apart.![]()
The ability of even someone like Donald Trump to hold evangelical voters makes it hazardous to risk alienating that base for no reason, not to mention the guys taking that dumb pact about not raising taxes.The same chance that people gave Trump when he said he was running for president?![]()
I don't really get this line of thinking. Trump may be a lot of things but a militarist isn't really one of them. If anything he's been making noises about winding back NATO and it's push further east towards Russia and building ties with Russia, which is the complete opposite to Clinton.
