Analysis The Sack List: who stays, who goes in an AFC cleanout?

[MRB37]

I wish I could **** up as badly as Burton and Hass and still keep my job.

 

[Anzacpaul]

**** sake. Should've known better than to think we'd have some balls.

 

[GreyCrow]

subtext : website hits , attendances, keeping your mouth shut and not agitating are more important than success

 

[Scorpus]

subtext : website hits , attendances, keeping your mouth shut and not agitating are more important than success

There is no way we will have even close to 97k members after the official AFL audit. 30k of those will be removed easily

 

[Rotayjay]

This club disgusts me actually. I mean, I love the club itself but I hate what its 'custodians' have done to it. A grand final to missing the eight and the chief f*** ups get assurances they will keep their jobs before a review even takes place.

Honestly **** this.

 

[GreyCrow]

I see one more player that might be in trouble



Going on his posting style he isnt going to be here long

 

[simmo97]

This club disgusts me actually. I mean, I love the club itself but I hate what its 'custodians' have done to it. A grand final to missing the eight and the chief f*** ups get assurances they will keep their jobs before a review even takes place.

Honestly **** this.

has the club said Hass and Burton will keep their jobs.

 

[Murray2503]

Does anyone honestly feel Riccuito is going to turf one of his best mates in Burton regardless what he does to the club? The real problem at the club is roo and chapman. Until they are gone people are wasting their time discussing who needs to go. These two clueless fools will run the club into the ground before they are removed.

 

[Elite Crow]

Of course we do

 

[azza77]

Of course we do

Couldn’t have started my week off any better than with that news... *rolls eyes*

 

[I Lost My Keays]

With those comments, Campo is threatened

 

[Rotayjay]

Of course we do

What absolute rot. Our midfield has been okay in a couple of matches but otherwise garbage.

 

[Elite Crow]

So why is Campo an assistant prejudging the outcome of the review which hasn’t started yet?

 

[Rotayjay]

So why is Campo an assistant prejudging the outcome of the review which hasn’t started yet?

This is the AFC. The sun will shine, the earth will revolve around the sun, the earth will spin on its axis, seagulls will eat chips, and long-standing statues like Campo will keep their jobs.

 

[AFC3000]

Of course we do

Yeah of course he does, because he's probably one of the people who should be under review, however, I expect he's sitting right alongside Burton conducting the review, the same review they did after the GF loss, the same one they'll do next year and the year after that.

I expect it to go as well as Burton's press conference with Pyke earlier in the year. A lot of "we" and "but Pyke thought so as well".

Who's reviewing the reviewers?

 

[GreyCrow]

So why is Campo an assistant prejudging the outcome of the review which hasn’t started yet?

According the Advertiser I read in the library ( thats where us oldies go when its cold) and Fagan said the club has reviewed everything. So much so that anytime an issue comes up we automatically review it. Such a pro-active club

 

[King Elvis]

So why is Campo an assistant prejudging the outcome of the review which hasn’t started yet?

It’s a ****ing joke.

Who is running this review?!

 

[Rotayjay]

Yeah of course he does, because he's probably one of the people who should be under review, however, I expect he's sitting right alongside Burton conducting the review, the same review they did after the GF loss, the same one they'll do next year and the year after that.

I expect to go as well as Burton's press conference with Pyke earlier in the year. A lot of "we" and "but Pyke thought so as well".

Who's reviewing the reviewers?

I laughed quite loudly because it's almost certainly true.

 

[Cockwomble]

Maybe we need to get a petition to force an external review

 

[GreyCrow]

Fagan Promises Review

We’ve had a bunch of injuries — collision-based injuries —???????????????? we just haven’t been able to put the same team on the park,” he said on Triple M radio on Sunday.

“But we’ve acknowledged there have been some misses on our part, and players have acknowledged some misses on their part as well, so it’s something that will form part of our learnings for the year and we’ll continue to push and strive to get better.”

Fagan also pointed out that like all clubs, Adelaide is constantly reviewing its operations to ensure it kept pace with the changing face of a competitive AFL landscape.

“We don’t just stay internal and the thing about reviews is you don’t just do one at the end of the year, we review constantly, you’re actually reviewing things on a week-to-week basis,” he said.

We bring in external people to do that as well, we’ve had leading sportscientists in there this year reviewing some of our high performance and sport science departments, they were in there last year and the year before so it’s a regular part of doing business.”

He said Adelaide’s struggles in 2018 could not be put down to one individual.

The rest is available on the site or in the link

 

[El Doederino]

subtext : website hits , attendances, keeping your mouth shut and not agitating are more important than success

I wish they'd stop with this 90k member rubbish

We all know its nonsense and doesn't represent 97,675 unique individual real life people that can be considered "members".

This is just a nonsense stat. Why don't they just say we have 250,000 members, since we seem to be applying our own definition of what a "member" is.

 

[GreyCrow]

I wish they'd stop with this 90k member rubbish

We all know its nonsense and doesn't represent 97,675 unique individual real life people that can be considered "members".

This is just a nonsense stat. Why don't they just say we have 250,000 members, since we seem to be applying our own definition of what a "member" is.

Its in the Constitution

ORDINARY MEMBERS There is to be a new class of Members to be called "Ordinary Members". Ordinary Members are those Members whose Membership benefits as prescribed by the Board do not include access to three or more home and away matches in a season. Ordinary Members have no right to attend or vote at General Meetings or to vote on elections of Directors.

ELECTING MEMBERS The existing class of Electing Members (which excludes Ordinary Members) may be divided into various categories with differing benefits as the Board prescribes from time to time.

 

[El Doederino]

Fagan Promises Review

We’ve had a bunch of injuries — collision-based injuries —???????????????? we just haven’t been able to put the same team on the park,” he said on Triple M radio on Sunday.

“But we’ve acknowledged there have been some misses on our part, and players have acknowledged some misses on their part as well, so it’s something that will form part of our learnings for the year and we’ll continue to push and strive to get better.”

Fagan also pointed out that like all clubs, Adelaide is constantly reviewing its operations to ensure it kept pace with the changing face of a competitive AFL landscape.

“We don’t just stay internal and the thing about reviews is you don’t just do one at the end of the year, we review constantly, you’re actually reviewing things on a week-to-week basis,” he said.

We bring in external people to do that as well, we’ve had leading sportscientists in there this year reviewing some of our high performance and sport science departments, they were in there last year and the year before so it’s a regular part of doing business.”

He said Adelaide’s struggles in 2018 could not be put down to one individual.

The rest is available on the site or in the link

He used the term "learnings"

#sackfages

 

[SugarShane]

I see one more player that might be in trouble

View attachment 545520

Going on his posting style he isnt going to be here long

Getting any nibbles on Oasis?

 

[El Doederino]

Its in the Constitution

ORDINARY MEMBERS There is to be a new class of Members to be called "Ordinary Members". Ordinary Members are those Members whose Membership benefits as prescribed by the Board do not include access to three or more home and away matches in a season. Ordinary Members have no right to attend or vote at General Meetings or to vote on elections of Directors.

ELECTING MEMBERS The existing class of Electing Members (which excludes Ordinary Members) may be divided into various categories with differing benefits as the Board prescribes from time to time.

That definition just says the board can determine what a Member is, based on whatever it wants.

I read an article online about Eddie Betts, therefore I am a member (potentially, if thats what the board decides).