burton,clayton, robbins, sav, porter, colbert, baird, blakey, burke, mclaren, harding, mccartney, sinclair.
is this really a north melbourne team or a bag of mixed lollies?
how does pagan instill a sense of "us versus them" when a third of the list was once them?
do you guys think this is a problem? when you consider our recent success have been largely built on the back of a large number of shinboner only types.... carey, stevens, archer, rock, crocker, scholl, longmire, mckernan, schwass, anderson, smith, fairley, king, harvey, picket, simpson. with only occasional fill-in added. the list of recruits seem to almost overwhelm grassroots kangaroos only players.... bring on petrie, motlops, smith, harris, pratt, hale. i want a new bunch of players who are shinboner only.
with the true shinboner spirit then when we are getting beaten are lads will make them pay for every possesion instead of just giving up like we did on saturday.
is this really a north melbourne team or a bag of mixed lollies?
how does pagan instill a sense of "us versus them" when a third of the list was once them?
do you guys think this is a problem? when you consider our recent success have been largely built on the back of a large number of shinboner only types.... carey, stevens, archer, rock, crocker, scholl, longmire, mckernan, schwass, anderson, smith, fairley, king, harvey, picket, simpson. with only occasional fill-in added. the list of recruits seem to almost overwhelm grassroots kangaroos only players.... bring on petrie, motlops, smith, harris, pratt, hale. i want a new bunch of players who are shinboner only.
with the true shinboner spirit then when we are getting beaten are lads will make them pay for every possesion instead of just giving up like we did on saturday.