GotTheGoodes
Bloods
- Moderator
- #526
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Mega Thread The Stats Thread
- Thread starter Tippett2Goal
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
grimlock
Hall of Famer
What to expect tonight
Lots of free kicks
The Cats have received the most free kicks in the competition AND have given away the most free kicks too. In Joel Selwood and Patrick Dangerfield they have 2 of the AFL's leading 3 free kick recipients. With our own Luke Parker 4nd in free kicks against, expect plenty of frees to the Geelong midfield tonight.
Table 1: Frees For per game
Rank
|
Team
|
Frees For (avg)
\ 1st | GEE | 20.8
\2nd|BRL|20.3
\3rd|CAR|20.0
\4th|ADE|19.8
\5th|WBD|19.7
\6th|NTH|19.7
\ 7th | SYD | 19.0
\8th|PTA|19.0
\9th|WCE|18.8
\10th|MEL|18.6
\11th|GWS|18.4
\12th|RIC|18.3
\13th|COL|18.0
\14th|STK|17.8
\15th|ESS|17.8
\16th|GCS|17.3
\17th|FRE|17.0
\18th|HAW|16.5
\Mean|Mean|18.7
Table 2: Frees Against per game
Rank
|
Team
|
Frees Against (avg)
\1st|COL|15.9
\2nd|WBD|16.8
\3rd|STK|17.0
\4th|WCE|17.4
\5th|GCS|17.5
\6th|HAW|17.8
\7th|NTH|18.0
\8th|BRL|18.1
\9th|ESS|18.5
\10th|CAR|18.6
\11th|MEL|18.8
\12th|FRE|18.9
\13th|ADE|19.7
\ 14th | SYD | 19.9
\15th|GWS|20.5
\16th|PTA|20.5
\17th|RIC|21.2
\ 18th | GEE | 21.6
\Mean|Mean|18.7
Table 3: Frees For per game
Rank
|
Player
|
Team
|
Frees For (avg)
\ 1st | Joel SELWOOD | GEE | 3.32
\2nd|Rory SLOANE|ADE|2.59
\ 3rd | Patrick DANGERFIELD | GEE | 2.50
\4th|Rhys MATHIESON|BRL|2.46
\5th|Shane MUMFORD|GWS|2.10
\6th|Luke SHUEY|WCE|1.91
\7th|Billy LONGER|STK|1.82
\8th|Dayne ZORKO|BRL|1.81
\ 9th | Luke PARKER | SYD | 1.78
\10th|Patrick RYDER|PTA|1.77
Table 4: Frees Against per game
Rank
|
Player
|
Team
|
Frees Against (avg)
\1st|Shane MUMFORD|GWS|2.81
\2nd|Jackson TRENGOVE|PTA|2.26
\3rd|Tom BELLCHAMBERS|ESS|2.07
\ 4th | Luke PARKER | SYD | 1.96
\5th|Sam POWELL-PEPPER|PTA|1.95
\6th|Max GAWN|MEL|1.92
\7th|Patrick RYDER|PTA|1.91
\8th|Nat FYFE|FRE|1.90
\9th|Clayton OLIVER|MEL|1.82
\10th|Joe DANIHER|ESS|1.78
No easy possessions
Geelong have conceded the fewest number of disposals in the AFL, and tellingly have conceded the fewest number of uncontested possessions. Led by tackling machine Scott Selwood, the Cats have completed the most tackles in the AFL.
Table 5: Tackles per game
Rank
|
Team
|
Tackles (avg)
\ 1st | GEE | 74.5
\2nd|MEL|71.9
\3rd|ADE|71.5
\4th|WBD|70.4
\5th|HAW|69.8
\6th|NTH|69.6
\7th|COL|69.5
\8th|CAR|69.4
\9th|STK|69.3
\ 10th | SYD | 68.9
\11th|PTA|68.9
\12th|RIC|68.7
\13th|GWS|68.3
\14th|FRE|63.7
\15th|ESS|63.5
\16th|WCE|62.9
\17th|BRL|62.1
\18th|GCS|61.6
\Mean|Mean|68.0
Table 6: Tackles per game
Rank
|
Player
|
Team
|
Tackles (avg)
\ 1st | Scott SELWOOD | GEE | 11.33
\2nd|Rory SLOANE|ADE|8.00
\3rd|Jack STEELE|STK|7.90
\4th|Matt PRIDDIS|WCE|7.80
\5th|Brad EBERT|PTA|7.65
\6th|Hugh GREENWOOD|ADE|7.15
\eq 7th|Jack VINEY|MEL|7.00
\eq 7th|Dayne ZORKO|BRL|7.00
\9th|Clayton OLIVER|MEL|6.91
\10th|Brad CROUCH|ADE|6.72
Forward pressure on our back line
The Cats are very strong in two pressure categories - tackles inside 50 and scoring goals from turnovers. The Cats have 6 players in the Top 30 for Tackles inside 50 (although only 5 are playing tonight). By comparison the Swans have none with Papley and Parker just outside in 35th and 43rd respectively. Expect plenty of pressure to be placed on our defenders as the Cats aim to lock the ball in their forward half, especially in the wet.
Table 7: Tackles inside 50
Rank
|
Team
|
Tk50
\ 1st | GEE | 14.0
\2nd|RIC|14.0
\3rd|STK|13.9
\4th|ADE|13.9
\5th|PTA|13.7
\6th|MEL|13.5
\ 7th | SYD | 12.7
\8th|NTH|11.9
\9th|WCE|11.8
\10th|WBD|11.7
\11th|COL|11.5
\12th|GWS|11.0
\13th|HAW|10.7
\14th|CAR|10.7
\15th|ESS|10.5
\16th|BRL|10.2
\17th|GCS|10.1
\18th|FRE|8.8
\Mean|Mean|11.9
Table 8: Tackles inside 50 per game
Rank
|
Player
|
Team
|
Tackles I50 (avg)
\1st|Jake NEADE|PTA|2.29
\2nd|Jed ANDERSON|NTH|2.20
\3rd|Jamie CRIPPS|WCE|2.15
\4th|Jeff GARLETT|MEL|2.10
\5th|Eddie BETTS|ADE|1.95
\6th|Paul PUOPOLO|HAW|1.93
\eq 7th|Tom BELL|BRL|1.83
\ eq 7th | Wylie BUZZA | GEE | 1.83
\eq 7th|Jack LONIE|STK|1.83
\10th|Matt DE BOER|GWS|1.77
\11th|Josh GREEN|ESS|1.76
\12th|Clay SMITH|WBD|1.75
\13th|Josh DUNKLEY|WBD|1.71
\14th|Anthony McDONALD-TIPUNGWUTI|ESS|1.61
\ eq 15th | Nakia COCKATOO | GEE | 1.60
\ eq 15th | Tom HAWKINS | GEE | 1.60
\eq 15th|Jarrad WAITE|NTH|1.60
\18th|Jake BARRETT|BRL|1.59
\ eq 19th | Sam MENEGOLA | GEE | 1.55
\eq 19th|Jack STEELE|STK|1.55
\21st|Kayne TURNER|NTH|1.53
\ eq 22nd | Darcy LANG | GEE | 1.50
\eq 22nd|Darcy MacPHERSON|GCS|1.50
\ eq 22nd | Scott SELWOOD | GEE | 1.50
\eq 22nd|Rory SLOANE|ADE|1.50
\eq 22nd|Mason WOOD|NTH|1.50
\27th|Jack DARLING|WCE|1.45
\28th|Jarryd BLAIR|COL|1.42
\29th|Mav WELLER|STK|1.39
\30th|Hugh GREENWOOD|ADE|1.38
Table 9: Goal scored from opposition turnovers per game
Rank
|
Team
|
Goal Opp TO (avg)
\1st|ADE|10.4
\2nd|ESS|8.6
\ 3rd | GEE | 8.3
\ 4th | SYD | 8.1
\5th|MEL|8.1
\6th|PTA|8.0
\7th|GWS|7.9
\8th|RIC|7.8
\9th|STK|7.7
\10th|NTH|7.5
\11th|HAW|7.5
\12th|BRL|7.4
\13th|COL|7.3
\14th|WCE|7.1
\15th|WBD|7.0
\16th|GCS|6.9
\17th|CAR|6.6
\18th|FRE|5.5
\Mean|Mean|7.6
Lots of free kicks
The Cats have received the most free kicks in the competition AND have given away the most free kicks too. In Joel Selwood and Patrick Dangerfield they have 2 of the AFL's leading 3 free kick recipients. With our own Luke Parker 4nd in free kicks against, expect plenty of frees to the Geelong midfield tonight.
Table 1: Frees For per game
\ 1st | GEE | 20.8
\2nd|BRL|20.3
\3rd|CAR|20.0
\4th|ADE|19.8
\5th|WBD|19.7
\6th|NTH|19.7
\ 7th | SYD | 19.0
\8th|PTA|19.0
\9th|WCE|18.8
\10th|MEL|18.6
\11th|GWS|18.4
\12th|RIC|18.3
\13th|COL|18.0
\14th|STK|17.8
\15th|ESS|17.8
\16th|GCS|17.3
\17th|FRE|17.0
\18th|HAW|16.5
\Mean|Mean|18.7
Table 2: Frees Against per game
\1st|COL|15.9
\2nd|WBD|16.8
\3rd|STK|17.0
\4th|WCE|17.4
\5th|GCS|17.5
\6th|HAW|17.8
\7th|NTH|18.0
\8th|BRL|18.1
\9th|ESS|18.5
\10th|CAR|18.6
\11th|MEL|18.8
\12th|FRE|18.9
\13th|ADE|19.7
\ 14th | SYD | 19.9
\15th|GWS|20.5
\16th|PTA|20.5
\17th|RIC|21.2
\ 18th | GEE | 21.6
\Mean|Mean|18.7
Table 3: Frees For per game
\ 1st | Joel SELWOOD | GEE | 3.32
\2nd|Rory SLOANE|ADE|2.59
\ 3rd | Patrick DANGERFIELD | GEE | 2.50
\4th|Rhys MATHIESON|BRL|2.46
\5th|Shane MUMFORD|GWS|2.10
\6th|Luke SHUEY|WCE|1.91
\7th|Billy LONGER|STK|1.82
\8th|Dayne ZORKO|BRL|1.81
\ 9th | Luke PARKER | SYD | 1.78
\10th|Patrick RYDER|PTA|1.77
Table 4: Frees Against per game
\1st|Shane MUMFORD|GWS|2.81
\2nd|Jackson TRENGOVE|PTA|2.26
\3rd|Tom BELLCHAMBERS|ESS|2.07
\ 4th | Luke PARKER | SYD | 1.96
\5th|Sam POWELL-PEPPER|PTA|1.95
\6th|Max GAWN|MEL|1.92
\7th|Patrick RYDER|PTA|1.91
\8th|Nat FYFE|FRE|1.90
\9th|Clayton OLIVER|MEL|1.82
\10th|Joe DANIHER|ESS|1.78
No easy possessions
Geelong have conceded the fewest number of disposals in the AFL, and tellingly have conceded the fewest number of uncontested possessions. Led by tackling machine Scott Selwood, the Cats have completed the most tackles in the AFL.
Table 5: Tackles per game
\ 1st | GEE | 74.5
\2nd|MEL|71.9
\3rd|ADE|71.5
\4th|WBD|70.4
\5th|HAW|69.8
\6th|NTH|69.6
\7th|COL|69.5
\8th|CAR|69.4
\9th|STK|69.3
\ 10th | SYD | 68.9
\11th|PTA|68.9
\12th|RIC|68.7
\13th|GWS|68.3
\14th|FRE|63.7
\15th|ESS|63.5
\16th|WCE|62.9
\17th|BRL|62.1
\18th|GCS|61.6
\Mean|Mean|68.0
Table 6: Tackles per game
\ 1st | Scott SELWOOD | GEE | 11.33
\2nd|Rory SLOANE|ADE|8.00
\3rd|Jack STEELE|STK|7.90
\4th|Matt PRIDDIS|WCE|7.80
\5th|Brad EBERT|PTA|7.65
\6th|Hugh GREENWOOD|ADE|7.15
\eq 7th|Jack VINEY|MEL|7.00
\eq 7th|Dayne ZORKO|BRL|7.00
\9th|Clayton OLIVER|MEL|6.91
\10th|Brad CROUCH|ADE|6.72
Forward pressure on our back line
The Cats are very strong in two pressure categories - tackles inside 50 and scoring goals from turnovers. The Cats have 6 players in the Top 30 for Tackles inside 50 (although only 5 are playing tonight). By comparison the Swans have none with Papley and Parker just outside in 35th and 43rd respectively. Expect plenty of pressure to be placed on our defenders as the Cats aim to lock the ball in their forward half, especially in the wet.
Table 7: Tackles inside 50
\ 1st | GEE | 14.0
\2nd|RIC|14.0
\3rd|STK|13.9
\4th|ADE|13.9
\5th|PTA|13.7
\6th|MEL|13.5
\ 7th | SYD | 12.7
\8th|NTH|11.9
\9th|WCE|11.8
\10th|WBD|11.7
\11th|COL|11.5
\12th|GWS|11.0
\13th|HAW|10.7
\14th|CAR|10.7
\15th|ESS|10.5
\16th|BRL|10.2
\17th|GCS|10.1
\18th|FRE|8.8
\Mean|Mean|11.9
Table 8: Tackles inside 50 per game
\1st|Jake NEADE|PTA|2.29
\2nd|Jed ANDERSON|NTH|2.20
\3rd|Jamie CRIPPS|WCE|2.15
\4th|Jeff GARLETT|MEL|2.10
\5th|Eddie BETTS|ADE|1.95
\6th|Paul PUOPOLO|HAW|1.93
\eq 7th|Tom BELL|BRL|1.83
\ eq 7th | Wylie BUZZA | GEE | 1.83
\eq 7th|Jack LONIE|STK|1.83
\10th|Matt DE BOER|GWS|1.77
\11th|Josh GREEN|ESS|1.76
\12th|Clay SMITH|WBD|1.75
\13th|Josh DUNKLEY|WBD|1.71
\14th|Anthony McDONALD-TIPUNGWUTI|ESS|1.61
\ eq 15th | Nakia COCKATOO | GEE | 1.60
\ eq 15th | Tom HAWKINS | GEE | 1.60
\eq 15th|Jarrad WAITE|NTH|1.60
\18th|Jake BARRETT|BRL|1.59
\ eq 19th | Sam MENEGOLA | GEE | 1.55
\eq 19th|Jack STEELE|STK|1.55
\21st|Kayne TURNER|NTH|1.53
\ eq 22nd | Darcy LANG | GEE | 1.50
\eq 22nd|Darcy MacPHERSON|GCS|1.50
\ eq 22nd | Scott SELWOOD | GEE | 1.50
\eq 22nd|Rory SLOANE|ADE|1.50
\eq 22nd|Mason WOOD|NTH|1.50
\27th|Jack DARLING|WCE|1.45
\28th|Jarryd BLAIR|COL|1.42
\29th|Mav WELLER|STK|1.39
\30th|Hugh GREENWOOD|ADE|1.38
Table 9: Goal scored from opposition turnovers per game
\1st|ADE|10.4
\2nd|ESS|8.6
\ 3rd | GEE | 8.3
\ 4th | SYD | 8.1
\5th|MEL|8.1
\6th|PTA|8.0
\7th|GWS|7.9
\8th|RIC|7.8
\9th|STK|7.7
\10th|NTH|7.5
\11th|HAW|7.5
\12th|BRL|7.4
\13th|COL|7.3
\14th|WCE|7.1
\15th|WBD|7.0
\16th|GCS|6.9
\17th|CAR|6.6
\18th|FRE|5.5
\Mean|Mean|7.6
scaryness
Premium Platinum
- Oct 19, 2008
- 14,886
- 23,383
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Trail Blazers / Cowboys
Not quite to the level of analysis that grim provides but thought I'd post this anyway as it was on the Swans website.
Kicks
1. Jake Lloyd - 370
2. Lance Franklin - 316
3. Luke Parker - 304
4. Callum Mills - 267
5. Nic Newman - 260
Handballs
1. Josh Kennedy - 344
2. Dan Hannebery - 328
3. Luke Parker - 304
4. George Hewett - 250
5. Jake Lloyd - 227
Disposals
1. Luke Parker - 608
2. Jake Lloyd - 597
3. Josh Kennedy - 592
4. Dan Hannebery - 569
5. Zak Jones - 458
Clearances
1. Luke Parker – 151
2. Josh Kennedy – 142
3. George Hewett – 77
4. Dan Hannebery – 71
5. Isaac Heeney – 64
Marks
1. Lance Franklin – 158
2. Jake Lloyd – 136
3. Sam Reid – 134
4. Heath Grundy – 130
5. Callum Mills – 121
Tackles
1. Luke Parker – 134
2. Dan Hannebery – 119
3. George Hewett – 115
4. Josh Kennedy – 103
5. Isaac Heeney – 95
Goals
1. Lance Franklin – 73
2. Tom Papley – 30
2. Sam Reid – 30
4. Will Hayward – 22
4. Gary Rohan – 22
Goal Assists
1. Lance Franklin – 19
2. Kieren Jack – 18
2. Tom Papley – 18
4. Zak Jones – 15
4. Dan Hannebery - 15
Kicks
1. Jake Lloyd - 370
2. Lance Franklin - 316
3. Luke Parker - 304
4. Callum Mills - 267
5. Nic Newman - 260
Handballs
1. Josh Kennedy - 344
2. Dan Hannebery - 328
3. Luke Parker - 304
4. George Hewett - 250
5. Jake Lloyd - 227
Disposals
1. Luke Parker - 608
2. Jake Lloyd - 597
3. Josh Kennedy - 592
4. Dan Hannebery - 569
5. Zak Jones - 458
Clearances
1. Luke Parker – 151
2. Josh Kennedy – 142
3. George Hewett – 77
4. Dan Hannebery – 71
5. Isaac Heeney – 64
Marks
1. Lance Franklin – 158
2. Jake Lloyd – 136
3. Sam Reid – 134
4. Heath Grundy – 130
5. Callum Mills – 121
Tackles
1. Luke Parker – 134
2. Dan Hannebery – 119
3. George Hewett – 115
4. Josh Kennedy – 103
5. Isaac Heeney – 95
Goals
1. Lance Franklin – 73
2. Tom Papley – 30
2. Sam Reid – 30
4. Will Hayward – 22
4. Gary Rohan – 22
Goal Assists
1. Lance Franklin – 19
2. Kieren Jack – 18
2. Tom Papley – 18
4. Zak Jones – 15
4. Dan Hannebery - 15
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Luke casually leading disposals, tackles and clearances but we should trade him. Smdh.
On CPH1607 using BigFooty.com mobile app
Last edited:
grimlock
Hall of Famer
Plugging some numbers into the stats machine (no not SM) for tonight's game, some disturbing results have come up.
First, the Swans have the equal 2nd worst I50 differential in the league, tied with St Kilda and the Brisbane Lions. Most disturbingly, we've only averaged 49 inside 50s ranking 2nd last in the league.
Last week's tally of 42 inside 50s for (a season low) and 60 inside 50's conceded (an equal season high with R1 v West Coast) against an inexperienced Bulldogs team, resulting in a net -18 inside 50s would have lost most according to historical AFL stats.
Table 1: I50 differential
Rank
|
Team
|
I50 for
|
I50 against
|
I50 diff
\1st|Melbourne|59.8|48.0|+11.8
\2nd|West Coast|58.8|51.8|+7.0
\3rd|Richmond|57.0|50.3|+6.7
\4th|Hawthorn|56.8|52.3|+4.5
\5th|GWS|56.8|52.5|+4.3
\6th|Port Adelaide|54.0|50.3|+3.7
\7th|Fremantle|55.0|51.5|+3.5
\8th|W. Bulldogs|55.3|53.3|+2.0
\9th|Collingwood|54.8|53.8|+1.0
\10th|N. Melbourne|53.5|54.0|-0.5
\ 11th | Adelaide | 54.3 | 55.3 | -1.0
\12th|Essendon|51.5|53.0|-1.5
\13th|Carlton|52.8|56.8|-4.0
\14th|Gold Coast|52.3|57.5|-5.2
\15th|Geelong|50.3|57.5|-7.2
\eq 16th|St Kilda|49.5|57.0|-7.5
\ eq 16th | Sydney | 49.0 | 56.5 | -7.5
\18th|Brisbane|45.8|55.8|-10.0
\ AFL | Average | 53.7 | 53.7 | 0.0
However, this has been masked somewhat by our forward rate conversion, led of course by the incomparable Lance Franklin and a notable improvement in goalkicking accuracy (12th last year).
Table 2: I50 that result in a goal (%)
Rank
|
Team
|
I50 goal rate (%)
\ 1st | Sydney | 29.08%
\2nd|Geelong|28.86%
\3rd|West Coast|28.09%
\4th|Hawthorn|27.75%
\5th|Essendon|27.18%
\6th|Richmond|26.32%
\7th|Port Adelaide|25.93%
\8th|GWS|25.55%
\ 9th | Adelaide | 24.88%
\10th|Collingwood|24.20%
\11th|N. Melbourne|22.90%
\12th|Melbourne|21.34%
\13th|Brisbane|20.77%
\14th|Fremantle|20.45%
\15th|Gold Coast|19.62%
\16th|W. Bulldogs|18.55%
\17th|Carlton|18.48%
\18th|St Kilda|17.68%
\ AFL | Average | 23.79%
Table 3: Goalkicking accuracy
Rank
|
Team
|
GK%
\ 1st | Sydney | 56.44%
\2nd|Hawthorn|56.25%
\3rd|West Coast|55.93%
\4th|Collingwood|54.64%
\ 5th | Adelaide | 52.94%
\6th|Geelong|52.73%
\7th|Richmond|50.85%
\8th|Essendon|50.45%
\9th|N. Melbourne|48.04%
\10th|Port Adelaide|47.86%
\11th|Carlton|47.56%
\12th|GWS|47.54%
\13th|Fremantle|46.88%
\14th|Melbourne|44.35%
\15th|Gold Coast|44.09%
\16th|Brisbane|43.68%
\17th|St Kilda|39.77%
\18th|W. Bulldogs|37.61%
\ AFL | Average | 48.94%
At the other end, despite some isolated moments of shakiness, the stats show that on the whole, the back 6 is holding up very well.
Table 4: I50 conceded that result in an opposition goal (%)
Rank
|
Team
|
I50 goal rate (%)
\1st|N. Melbourne|15.74%
\2nd|GWS|20.00%
\3rd|Gold Coast|20.87%
\ 4th | Sydney | 22.12%
\ 5th | Adelaide | 22.17%
\6th|Geelong|22.17%
\7th|West Coast|22.71%
\8th|Hawthorn|22.97%
\9th|Collingwood|23.26%
\10th|Richmond|23.88%
\11th|St Kilda|24.12%
\12th|Port Adelaide|24.38%
\13th|Fremantle|24.76%
\14th|Essendon|25.47%
\15th|Brisbane|26.91%
\16th|Melbourne|28.65%
\17th|Carlton|29.07%
\18th|W. Bulldogs|29.58%
\ AFL | Average | 23.79%
The questions going into tonight's game then, are:
First, the Swans have the equal 2nd worst I50 differential in the league, tied with St Kilda and the Brisbane Lions. Most disturbingly, we've only averaged 49 inside 50s ranking 2nd last in the league.
Last week's tally of 42 inside 50s for (a season low) and 60 inside 50's conceded (an equal season high with R1 v West Coast) against an inexperienced Bulldogs team, resulting in a net -18 inside 50s would have lost most according to historical AFL stats.
Table 1: I50 differential
\1st|Melbourne|59.8|48.0|+11.8
\2nd|West Coast|58.8|51.8|+7.0
\3rd|Richmond|57.0|50.3|+6.7
\4th|Hawthorn|56.8|52.3|+4.5
\5th|GWS|56.8|52.5|+4.3
\6th|Port Adelaide|54.0|50.3|+3.7
\7th|Fremantle|55.0|51.5|+3.5
\8th|W. Bulldogs|55.3|53.3|+2.0
\9th|Collingwood|54.8|53.8|+1.0
\10th|N. Melbourne|53.5|54.0|-0.5
\ 11th | Adelaide | 54.3 | 55.3 | -1.0
\12th|Essendon|51.5|53.0|-1.5
\13th|Carlton|52.8|56.8|-4.0
\14th|Gold Coast|52.3|57.5|-5.2
\15th|Geelong|50.3|57.5|-7.2
\eq 16th|St Kilda|49.5|57.0|-7.5
\ eq 16th | Sydney | 49.0 | 56.5 | -7.5
\18th|Brisbane|45.8|55.8|-10.0
\ AFL | Average | 53.7 | 53.7 | 0.0
However, this has been masked somewhat by our forward rate conversion, led of course by the incomparable Lance Franklin and a notable improvement in goalkicking accuracy (12th last year).
Table 2: I50 that result in a goal (%)
\ 1st | Sydney | 29.08%
\2nd|Geelong|28.86%
\3rd|West Coast|28.09%
\4th|Hawthorn|27.75%
\5th|Essendon|27.18%
\6th|Richmond|26.32%
\7th|Port Adelaide|25.93%
\8th|GWS|25.55%
\ 9th | Adelaide | 24.88%
\10th|Collingwood|24.20%
\11th|N. Melbourne|22.90%
\12th|Melbourne|21.34%
\13th|Brisbane|20.77%
\14th|Fremantle|20.45%
\15th|Gold Coast|19.62%
\16th|W. Bulldogs|18.55%
\17th|Carlton|18.48%
\18th|St Kilda|17.68%
\ AFL | Average | 23.79%
Table 3: Goalkicking accuracy
\ 1st | Sydney | 56.44%
\2nd|Hawthorn|56.25%
\3rd|West Coast|55.93%
\4th|Collingwood|54.64%
\ 5th | Adelaide | 52.94%
\6th|Geelong|52.73%
\7th|Richmond|50.85%
\8th|Essendon|50.45%
\9th|N. Melbourne|48.04%
\10th|Port Adelaide|47.86%
\11th|Carlton|47.56%
\12th|GWS|47.54%
\13th|Fremantle|46.88%
\14th|Melbourne|44.35%
\15th|Gold Coast|44.09%
\16th|Brisbane|43.68%
\17th|St Kilda|39.77%
\18th|W. Bulldogs|37.61%
\ AFL | Average | 48.94%
At the other end, despite some isolated moments of shakiness, the stats show that on the whole, the back 6 is holding up very well.
Table 4: I50 conceded that result in an opposition goal (%)
\1st|N. Melbourne|15.74%
\2nd|GWS|20.00%
\3rd|Gold Coast|20.87%
\ 4th | Sydney | 22.12%
\ 5th | Adelaide | 22.17%
\6th|Geelong|22.17%
\7th|West Coast|22.71%
\8th|Hawthorn|22.97%
\9th|Collingwood|23.26%
\10th|Richmond|23.88%
\11th|St Kilda|24.12%
\12th|Port Adelaide|24.38%
\13th|Fremantle|24.76%
\14th|Essendon|25.47%
\15th|Brisbane|26.91%
\16th|Melbourne|28.65%
\17th|Carlton|29.07%
\18th|W. Bulldogs|29.58%
\ AFL | Average | 23.79%
The questions going into tonight's game then, are:
- Can the Swans maintain their efficiently strong showing at either end of the ground?
- Will that be sufficient enough to paper over the cracks over what has been an underperforming midfield so far in 2018, or will the likes of Kennedy, Hannebery and Jack need to lift and take advantage of a weakened Crows outfit.
SwansProudly
Moderator
- Sep 5, 2016
- 10,009
- 27,805
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Sydney Swans AFLW
- Moderator
- #532
SM
Bigfooty Legend
I feel violated.
Definitely not sitting next to you tonight.
Definitely not sitting next to you tonight.
swansfan51
Brownlow Medallist
- Jun 3, 2007
- 12,753
- 21,357
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- The Exers
I forgot about this thread 
time to head back to the room
time to head back to the room
The King!
Chosen One
Swans accuracy has been exceptional
I must admit I didn't think our i50 differential was THAT bad. Midfield has a lot of work to do clearly.
sataris
Chief Toastie Officer
- Feb 15, 2015
- 10,694
- 21,696
- AFL Club
- Sydney
I forgot about this thread
Stat faps are the best faps.
grimlock
Hall of Famer
Okay let’s go back losing the inside 50 count, kicking accurately and winning the game. Thanks.
Honestly I think this team is finished. Our midfield has well and truly fallen off a cliff and with Horse steering a broken ship I think we're destined to be sunk and then drown slowly.
SwansProudly
Moderator
- Sep 5, 2016
- 10,009
- 27,805
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Sydney Swans AFLW
- Moderator
- #540
How do these AFL player ratings determine a player has what looks like a negative quarter?
Eg Paply and Hayward have a -ve 3rd quarter.
Thanks
Eg Paply and Hayward have a -ve 3rd quarter.
Thanks
grimlock
Hall of Famer
Probably stuff like turnovers, missed shots at goal, missed tackles, frees against
If we got paid to be supporters the Swans would be bankrupt.
grimlock
Hall of Famer
The main talk around North so far this year has revolved around the brilliance of Ben Brown, whose strong leading and accurate kicking has him sitting 4 clear of Luke Breust on top of the AFL goalkicking charts. He has undoubtedly been brilliant and deserves all the plaudits coming his way, and it is hard to argue that his form has helped North to a better position than most pundits were expecting at the beginning of the season.
However, if we take a closer look at the stats, we can see it is their defence that is contributing just as much, if not more to their success this year. They have conceded the 2nd least amount of goals, have the 2nd highest number of intercept possessions, and are the 2nd most miserly side when it comes to opposition's Inside 50 to goal conversion rate.
Table 1: Goals conceded
Rank
|
Team
|
Goals conceded (avg)
\1st|GWS|9.50
\ 2nd | N. Melbourne | 10.00
\3rd|Richmond|11.00
\4th|Adelaide|11.33
\eq 5th|Hawthorn|11.50
\eq 5th|West Coast|11.50
\7th|Geelong|11.67
\8th|Port Adelaide|11.83
\eq 9th|Fremantle|12.00
\ eq 9th | Sydney | 12.00
\11th|Collingwood|12.17
\12th|Gold Coast|12.33
\13th|St Kilda|12.83
\14th|Melbourne|13.33
\15th|Brisbane|13.50
\16th|Essendon|14.00
\eq 17th|Carlton|14.50
\eq 17th|W. Bulldogs|14.50
Table 2: Opposition goal per opposition inside 50 (%)
Rank
|
Team
|
%
\1st|GWS|17.81%
\ 2nd | N. Melbourne | 18.81%
\3rd|Adelaide|20.92%
\4th|Geelong|20.96%
\5th|Gold Coast|21.51%
\ 6th | Sydney | 22.09%
\7th|Richmond|22.15%
\8th|Collingwood|22.60%
\eq 9th|Hawthorn|23.08%
\eq 9th|West Coast|23.08%
\11th|St Kilda|23.26%
\12th|Port Adelaide|23.59%
\13th|Fremantle|23.76%
\14th|Brisbane|25.00%
\15th|Essendon|25.85%
\16th|Carlton|26.44%
\17th|Melbourne|26.85%
\18th|W. Bulldogs|27.44%
Table 3: Intercept Possessions (avg)
Rank
|
Team
|
Int Pos
\1st|Richmond|81.83
\ 2nd | N. Melbourne | 81.33
\3rd|Collingwood|80.00
\4th|Adelaide|79.67
\5th|Melbourne|78.67
\6th|Gold Coast|77.33
\7th|Hawthorn|75.67
\8th|GWS|75.50
\9th|St Kilda|74.50
\ 10th | Sydney | 70.33
\11th|West Coast|70.17
\12th|W. Bulldogs|69.83
\13th|Geelong|69.00
\14th|Fremantle|68.83
\15th|Port Adelaide|68.67
\16th|Essendon|67.67
\17th|Brisbane|67.50
\18th|Carlton|63.67
They have been led in defence by Scott Thompson who is posting intercept numbers that rank alongside noted intercept defenders Rance and McGovern.
Just like against Geelong, the Swans' midfielders will have to be careful not to bomb long to their smaller forwards because Thompson will be ready to intercept and launch counter attacks from the Kangaroos' back half.
Table 4: Player intercept possessions (avg)
Rank
|
Player
|
Int Pos
\1st|Alex RANCE (RIC)|11.00
\2nd|Phil DAVIS (GWS)|10.17
\3rd|Rory LAIRD (ADE)|9.83
\eq 4th|Jeremy McGOVERN (WCE)|9.67
\ eq 4th | Scott THOMPSON (NTH) | 9.67
\6th|James SICILY (HAW)|9.50
\7th|Tom JONAS (PTA)|9.17
\8th|Jake CARLISLE (STK)|8.83
\9th|Michael HURLEY (ESS)|8.50
\10th|Jeremy HOWE (COL)|8.00
\ eq 27th | Dane RAMPE (SYD) | 6.83
Table 5: Player intercept marks (avg)
Rank
|
Player
|
Int Mk
\eq 1st|Jake CARLISLE (STK)|4.33
\eq 1st|Jeremy McGOVERN (WCE)|4.33
\3rd|Alex RANCE (RIC)|3.67
\4th|Liam JONES (CAR)|3.33
\eq 5th|Phil DAVIS (GWS)|3.00
\eq 5th|Jeremy HOWE (COL)|3.00
\eq 5th|Tom DOEDEE (ADE)|3.00
\eq 5th|Luke RYAN (FRE)|3.00
\ eq 5th | Robbie TARRANT (NTH) | 3.00
\ eq 5th | Scott THOMPSON (NTH) | 3.00
\eq 5th|Bailey WILLIAMS (WBD)|3.00
\ eq 24th | Dane RAMPE (SYD) | 2.33
However, if we take a closer look at the stats, we can see it is their defence that is contributing just as much, if not more to their success this year. They have conceded the 2nd least amount of goals, have the 2nd highest number of intercept possessions, and are the 2nd most miserly side when it comes to opposition's Inside 50 to goal conversion rate.
Table 1: Goals conceded
\1st|GWS|9.50
\ 2nd | N. Melbourne | 10.00
\3rd|Richmond|11.00
\4th|Adelaide|11.33
\eq 5th|Hawthorn|11.50
\eq 5th|West Coast|11.50
\7th|Geelong|11.67
\8th|Port Adelaide|11.83
\eq 9th|Fremantle|12.00
\ eq 9th | Sydney | 12.00
\11th|Collingwood|12.17
\12th|Gold Coast|12.33
\13th|St Kilda|12.83
\14th|Melbourne|13.33
\15th|Brisbane|13.50
\16th|Essendon|14.00
\eq 17th|Carlton|14.50
\eq 17th|W. Bulldogs|14.50
Table 2: Opposition goal per opposition inside 50 (%)
\1st|GWS|17.81%
\ 2nd | N. Melbourne | 18.81%
\3rd|Adelaide|20.92%
\4th|Geelong|20.96%
\5th|Gold Coast|21.51%
\ 6th | Sydney | 22.09%
\7th|Richmond|22.15%
\8th|Collingwood|22.60%
\eq 9th|Hawthorn|23.08%
\eq 9th|West Coast|23.08%
\11th|St Kilda|23.26%
\12th|Port Adelaide|23.59%
\13th|Fremantle|23.76%
\14th|Brisbane|25.00%
\15th|Essendon|25.85%
\16th|Carlton|26.44%
\17th|Melbourne|26.85%
\18th|W. Bulldogs|27.44%
Table 3: Intercept Possessions (avg)
\1st|Richmond|81.83
\ 2nd | N. Melbourne | 81.33
\3rd|Collingwood|80.00
\4th|Adelaide|79.67
\5th|Melbourne|78.67
\6th|Gold Coast|77.33
\7th|Hawthorn|75.67
\8th|GWS|75.50
\9th|St Kilda|74.50
\ 10th | Sydney | 70.33
\11th|West Coast|70.17
\12th|W. Bulldogs|69.83
\13th|Geelong|69.00
\14th|Fremantle|68.83
\15th|Port Adelaide|68.67
\16th|Essendon|67.67
\17th|Brisbane|67.50
\18th|Carlton|63.67
They have been led in defence by Scott Thompson who is posting intercept numbers that rank alongside noted intercept defenders Rance and McGovern.
Just like against Geelong, the Swans' midfielders will have to be careful not to bomb long to their smaller forwards because Thompson will be ready to intercept and launch counter attacks from the Kangaroos' back half.
Table 4: Player intercept possessions (avg)
\1st|Alex RANCE (RIC)|11.00
\2nd|Phil DAVIS (GWS)|10.17
\3rd|Rory LAIRD (ADE)|9.83
\eq 4th|Jeremy McGOVERN (WCE)|9.67
\ eq 4th | Scott THOMPSON (NTH) | 9.67
\6th|James SICILY (HAW)|9.50
\7th|Tom JONAS (PTA)|9.17
\8th|Jake CARLISLE (STK)|8.83
\9th|Michael HURLEY (ESS)|8.50
\10th|Jeremy HOWE (COL)|8.00
\ eq 27th | Dane RAMPE (SYD) | 6.83
Table 5: Player intercept marks (avg)
\eq 1st|Jake CARLISLE (STK)|4.33
\eq 1st|Jeremy McGOVERN (WCE)|4.33
\3rd|Alex RANCE (RIC)|3.67
\4th|Liam JONES (CAR)|3.33
\eq 5th|Phil DAVIS (GWS)|3.00
\eq 5th|Jeremy HOWE (COL)|3.00
\eq 5th|Tom DOEDEE (ADE)|3.00
\eq 5th|Luke RYAN (FRE)|3.00
\ eq 5th | Robbie TARRANT (NTH) | 3.00
\ eq 5th | Scott THOMPSON (NTH) | 3.00
\eq 5th|Bailey WILLIAMS (WBD)|3.00
\ eq 24th | Dane RAMPE (SYD) | 2.33
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Number37
Anyhow, have a Winfield 25.
- Oct 5, 2013
- 23,099
- 25,133
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Are North's stats skewed by the game they played against Gold Coast in torrential rain?
We do need to watch North but their opponents to date have been:
GC (13th) - loss
Saints (16th) - win
Melb (12th) - loss
Carl (18th) - big win
Hawks (4TH) - win
Port (6TH) - loss
The Hawk win was impressive but they got the jump & were up by plenty & were nearly overrun.
The Carlton win inflated those stats. Carlton were putrid that game.
GC (13th) - loss
Saints (16th) - win
Melb (12th) - loss
Carl (18th) - big win
Hawks (4TH) - win
Port (6TH) - loss
The Hawk win was impressive but they got the jump & were up by plenty & were nearly overrun.
The Carlton win inflated those stats. Carlton were putrid that game.
grimlock
Hall of Famer
Yes also they've played Carlton and St Kilda
It's a must win game & win by plenty we must because I can't struggle to see us beating the Hawks at the MCG tbe following week as it will be the "keepings off" style that we just don't get.
Number37
Anyhow, have a Winfield 25.
- Oct 5, 2013
- 23,099
- 25,133
- AFL Club
- Sydney
You mean the annual bestest coach in the league shows how bestest he is by schooling the worsest coach in the league.
grimlock
Hall of Famer
Strengths
Weaknesses
Table 1: Hitouts
Rank
|
Team
|
HO
\1st|MEL|52.50
\2nd|WCE|51.75
\ 3rd | FRE | 47.50
\4th|COL|45.13
\5th|BRL|42.00
\6th|NTH|41.50
\7th|ADE|40.13
\8th|GCS|40.00
\9th|GEE|39.13
\ 10th | SYD | 38.50
\11th|HAW|37.38
\12th|CAR|36.13
\13th|ESS|36.00
\14th|PTA|34.50
\15th|GWS|32.50
\16th|STK|25.50
\17th|RIC|24.13
\18th|WBD|23.38
\ Mean | Mean | 38.20
Table 2: Hitouts-to-Advantage
Rank
|
Team
|
HOAdv
\1st|MEL|18.00
\ 2nd | FRE | 16.38
\3rd|WCE|13.25
\4th|COL|13.25
\5th|HAW|11.75
\6th|BRL|11.63
\7th|NTH|11.25
\8th|ESS|11.13
\ 9th | SYD | 10.25
\10th|GCS|10.25
\11th|ADE|10.00
\12th|GWS|9.75
\13th|GEE|9.38
\14th|CAR|9.38
\15th|PTA|9.25
\16th|RIC|6.88
\17th|STK|6.25
\18th|WBD|5.25
\ Mean | Mean | 10.74
Table 3: Hitouts-to-advantage / Hitouts (%)
Rank
|
Team
|
HOA/HW%
\ 1st | FRE | 34.47%
\2nd|MEL|34.29%
\3rd|HAW|31.44%
\4th|ESS|30.90%
\5th|GWS|30.00%
\6th|COL|29.36%
\7th|RIC|28.50%
\8th|BRL|27.68%
\9th|NTH|27.11%
\10th|PTA|26.81%
\ 11th | SYD | 26.62%
\12th|CAR|25.95%
\13th|GCS|25.63%
\14th|WCE|25.60%
\15th|ADE|24.92%
\16th|STK|24.51%
\17th|GEE|23.96%
\18th|WBD|22.46%
\ Mean | Mean | 27.79%
Table 4: Clearance %
Rank
|
Team
|
CLR%
\1st|WBD|54.04%
\ 2nd | FRE | 53.25%
\ 3rd | SYD | 52.01%
\4th|MEL|51.35%
\5th|GWS|51.09%
\6th|COL|51.03%
\7th|WCE|51.00%
\8th|HAW|50.96%
\9th|CAR|50.42%
\10th|BRL|50.09%
\11th|PTA|49.62%
\12th|GCS|49.42%
\13th|NTH|48.61%
\14th|ADE|48.26%
\15th|ESS|48.11%
\16th|RIC|47.76%
\17th|STK|46.85%
\18th|GEE|46.17%
\ Mean | Mean | 50.00%
Table 5: Contested Possession Rate%
Rank
|
Team
|
CPos%
\1st|GCS|43.86%
\2nd|NTH|43.36%
\3rd|MEL|42.43%
\4th|CAR|41.64%
\ 5th | SYD | 40.39%
\6th|GEE|40.26%
\7th|RIC|40.20%
\8th|WCE|39.81%
\9th|HAW|39.17%
\10th|ADE|39.09%
\11th|BRL|37.92%
\12th|GWS|37.71%
\13th|ESS|37.56%
\14th|COL|37.40%
\15th|PTA|36.74%
\ 16th | FRE | 36.33%
\17th|WBD|35.21%
\18th|STK|34.65%
\ Mean | Mean | 39.10%
Table 6: Uncontested Marks
Rank
|
Team
|
UncM
\1st|WBD|89.13
\ 2nd | FRE | 87.13
\3rd|PTA|86.75
\4th|WCE|86.38
\5th|ADE|85.38
\6th|GWS|83.00
\7th|STK|82.88
\8th|BRL|82.13
\9th|HAW|80.00
\10th|CAR|80.00
\11th|COL|79.88
\12th|GEE|79.13
\13th|ESS|76.63
\ 14th | SYD | 74.00
\15th|GCS|72.50
\16th|RIC|68.88
\17th|NTH|67.50
\18th|MEL|66.63
\ Mean | Mean | 79.33
Table 7: Tackles
Rank
|
Team
|
Tks
\1st|GCS|72.63
\2nd|PTA|69.75
\3rd|HAW|69.25
\4th|COL|68.25
\5th|MEL|68.00
\6th|CAR|66.38
\7th|GWS|66.13
\8th|NTH|65.88
\9th|RIC|65.38
\ 10th | SYD | 64.13
\11th|GEE|64.00
\12th|ESS|63.75
\13th|STK|63.13
\14th|WBD|60.50
\15th|BRL|60.00
\16th|ADE|59.75
\17th|WCE|58.38
\ 18th | FRE | 54.13
\ Mean | Mean | 64.41
Table 8: Opp Uncontested Marks
Rank
|
Team
|
Opp UncM
\1st|MEL|65.63
\2nd|PTA|72.13
\3rd|HAW|72.88
\4th|ADE|74.75
\5th|GEE|75.38
\6th|RIC|76.13
\7th|CAR|76.50
\ 8th | SYD | 78.00
\9th|NTH|78.75
\10th|GCS|79.50
\11th|GWS|80.63
\12th|WCE|80.88
\13th|WBD|81.13
\14th|COL|83.00
\15th|ESS|85.13
\16th|STK|86.50
\17th|BRL|89.50
\ 18th | FRE | 91.50
\ Mean | Mean | 79.33
Table 9: Score / Inside 50 (%)
Rank
|
Team
|
(G+B)/I50
\1st|RIC|49.15%
\2nd|ADE|47.75%
\3rd|WCE|47.11%
\4th|ESS|47.03%
\5th|GEE|46.86%
\6th|GWS|46.76%
\7th|MEL|45.47%
\8th|PTA|45.28%
\9th|NTH|44.50%
\ 10th | SYD | 44.25%
\11th|WBD|43.71%
\12th|HAW|42.70%
\13th|COL|42.30%
\14th|BRL|41.39%
\15th|STK|41.32%
\ 16th | FRE | 41.13%
\17th|GCS|39.41%
\18th|CAR|38.97%
\ Mean | Mean | 44.17%
Table 10: Goal / Inside 50 (%)
Rank
|
Team
|
G/I50
\1st|ADE|27.19%
\2nd|WCE|26.00%
\3rd|RIC|25.00%
\4th|GEE|24.88%
\5th|PTA|24.46%
\ 6th | SYD | 24.45%
\7th|HAW|24.34%
\8th|ESS|24.03%
\9th|NTH|23.25%
\10th|COL|23.22%
\11th|MEL|23.05%
\12th|BRL|21.85%
\13th|GWS|21.34%
\ 14th | FRE | 21.28%
\15th|CAR|20.77%
\16th|GCS|20.20%
\17th|WBD|19.91%
\18th|STK|16.87%
\ Mean | Mean | 22.89%
Table 11: Tackles inside 50
Rank
|
Team
|
TkI50
\1st|HAW|12.63
\2nd|RIC|12.00
\3rd|GCS|11.75
\4th|MEL|11.25
\5th|WCE|11.13
\6th|ADE|10.88
\7th|WBD|10.38
\8th|COL|10.25
\9th|ESS|10.13
\ 10th | SYD | 10.00
\11th|PTA|9.63
\12th|GWS|9.63
\13th|CAR|9.50
\14th|GEE|9.38
\15th|STK|8.88
\16th|BRL|8.38
\17th|NTH|8.13
\ 18th | FRE | 7.63
\ Mean | Mean | 10.09
Table 12: 1-on-1 Defensive Contests Lost (%)
Rank
|
Team
|
1/1DL%
\1st|GWS|21.97%
\2nd|COL|23.91%
\3rd|ADE|24.19%
\4th|MEL|26.67%
\5th|HAW|27.59%
\6th|NTH|28.32%
\7th|RIC|28.38%
\ 8th | SYD | 28.78%
\9th|WCE|28.78%
\10th|STK|30.40%
\11th|GEE|30.52%
\12th|CAR|31.01%
\13th|BRL|31.07%
\14th|ESS|32.89%
\ 15th | FRE | 33.06%
\16th|WBD|33.61%
\17th|PTA|34.53%
\18th|GCS|34.75%
\ Mean | Mean | 29.47%
Table 13: Individual 1-on-1 defensive contests loss (%) (min 5 contests)
Rank
|
Player
|
1/1 def contests
|
1/1 def cont loss
|
Loss (%)
\ 1st | Nathan WILSON (FRE) | 6 | 5 | 83.33%
\2nd|Jayden SHORT (RIC)|6|4|66.67%
\eq 3rd|Blake ACRES (STK)|5|3|60.00%
\eq 3rd|Darcy BYRNE-JONES (PTA)|5|3|60.00%
\eq 3rd|Matt EAGLES (BRL)|5|3|60.00%
\eq 3rd|Jack MARTIN (GCS)|5|3|60.00%
\eq 3rd|Josh WAGNER (MEL)|5|3|60.00%
\ 8th | Callum MILLS (SYD) | 14 | 8 | 57.14%
\9th|Jackson NELSON (WCE)|9|5|55.56%
\10th|Jack HENRY (GEE)|15|8|53.33%
\11th|Neville JETTA (MEL)|17|9|52.94%
\eq 12th|Lachie PLOWMAN (CAR)|18|9|50.00%
\ eq 12th | Luke RYAN (FRE) | 12 | 6 | 50.00%
\eq 12th|Dan HOUSTON (PTA)|10|5|50.00%
\eq 12th|Tom LANGDON (COL)|10|5|50.00%
\ eq 12th | Nick SMITH (SYD) | 10 | 5 | 50.00%
\eq 12th|Ryan BURTON (HAW)|8|4|50.00%
\eq 12th|Jacob ALLISON (BRL)|6|3|50.00%
\eq 12th|Kaiden BRAND (HAW)|6|3|50.00%
\eq 12th|Hamish HARTLETT (PTA)|6|3|50.00%
\eq 12th|Jack NEWNES (STK)|6|3|50.00%
\eq 12th|Zach TUOHY (GEE)|6|3|50.00%
\ eq 12th | Stephen HILL (FRE) | 6 | 3 | 50.00%
- No surprises that Freo's main advantage lies in their 211cm ruckman Aaron Sandilands. The Docker rank in the Top 3 for hitouts, hitouts to advantage, hitouts to advantage rate (%), and clearance ratio (i.e. clearances / (clearances + opposition clearances)).
- Perhaps because of their hitout advantage, the Dockers play one of the more uncontested styles in the AFL, ranking 3rd last in contested possession rate, 2nd in uncontested marks, last in tackles and also have conceded the most uncontested marks in the AFL.
Weaknesses
- Forward line efficiency is poor - both their score rate per inside 50 and their goal rate per inside 50 ranks in the bottom 5 in the league. Again, their failure to apply pressure in the forward 50 is evident, ranking last in tackles inside 50.
- They can be vulnerable in 1-on-1defensive contests, relying heavily on teammates to help. They rank 4th last in 1-on-1 defensive contests loss percentage with small defenders Nathan Wilson and Luke Ryan as well as midfielder Stephen Hill the major culprits.
Table 1: Hitouts
\1st|MEL|52.50
\2nd|WCE|51.75
\ 3rd | FRE | 47.50
\4th|COL|45.13
\5th|BRL|42.00
\6th|NTH|41.50
\7th|ADE|40.13
\8th|GCS|40.00
\9th|GEE|39.13
\ 10th | SYD | 38.50
\11th|HAW|37.38
\12th|CAR|36.13
\13th|ESS|36.00
\14th|PTA|34.50
\15th|GWS|32.50
\16th|STK|25.50
\17th|RIC|24.13
\18th|WBD|23.38
\ Mean | Mean | 38.20
Table 2: Hitouts-to-Advantage
\1st|MEL|18.00
\ 2nd | FRE | 16.38
\3rd|WCE|13.25
\4th|COL|13.25
\5th|HAW|11.75
\6th|BRL|11.63
\7th|NTH|11.25
\8th|ESS|11.13
\ 9th | SYD | 10.25
\10th|GCS|10.25
\11th|ADE|10.00
\12th|GWS|9.75
\13th|GEE|9.38
\14th|CAR|9.38
\15th|PTA|9.25
\16th|RIC|6.88
\17th|STK|6.25
\18th|WBD|5.25
\ Mean | Mean | 10.74
Table 3: Hitouts-to-advantage / Hitouts (%)
\ 1st | FRE | 34.47%
\2nd|MEL|34.29%
\3rd|HAW|31.44%
\4th|ESS|30.90%
\5th|GWS|30.00%
\6th|COL|29.36%
\7th|RIC|28.50%
\8th|BRL|27.68%
\9th|NTH|27.11%
\10th|PTA|26.81%
\ 11th | SYD | 26.62%
\12th|CAR|25.95%
\13th|GCS|25.63%
\14th|WCE|25.60%
\15th|ADE|24.92%
\16th|STK|24.51%
\17th|GEE|23.96%
\18th|WBD|22.46%
\ Mean | Mean | 27.79%
Table 4: Clearance %
\1st|WBD|54.04%
\ 2nd | FRE | 53.25%
\ 3rd | SYD | 52.01%
\4th|MEL|51.35%
\5th|GWS|51.09%
\6th|COL|51.03%
\7th|WCE|51.00%
\8th|HAW|50.96%
\9th|CAR|50.42%
\10th|BRL|50.09%
\11th|PTA|49.62%
\12th|GCS|49.42%
\13th|NTH|48.61%
\14th|ADE|48.26%
\15th|ESS|48.11%
\16th|RIC|47.76%
\17th|STK|46.85%
\18th|GEE|46.17%
\ Mean | Mean | 50.00%
Table 5: Contested Possession Rate%
\1st|GCS|43.86%
\2nd|NTH|43.36%
\3rd|MEL|42.43%
\4th|CAR|41.64%
\ 5th | SYD | 40.39%
\6th|GEE|40.26%
\7th|RIC|40.20%
\8th|WCE|39.81%
\9th|HAW|39.17%
\10th|ADE|39.09%
\11th|BRL|37.92%
\12th|GWS|37.71%
\13th|ESS|37.56%
\14th|COL|37.40%
\15th|PTA|36.74%
\ 16th | FRE | 36.33%
\17th|WBD|35.21%
\18th|STK|34.65%
\ Mean | Mean | 39.10%
Table 6: Uncontested Marks
\1st|WBD|89.13
\ 2nd | FRE | 87.13
\3rd|PTA|86.75
\4th|WCE|86.38
\5th|ADE|85.38
\6th|GWS|83.00
\7th|STK|82.88
\8th|BRL|82.13
\9th|HAW|80.00
\10th|CAR|80.00
\11th|COL|79.88
\12th|GEE|79.13
\13th|ESS|76.63
\ 14th | SYD | 74.00
\15th|GCS|72.50
\16th|RIC|68.88
\17th|NTH|67.50
\18th|MEL|66.63
\ Mean | Mean | 79.33
Table 7: Tackles
\1st|GCS|72.63
\2nd|PTA|69.75
\3rd|HAW|69.25
\4th|COL|68.25
\5th|MEL|68.00
\6th|CAR|66.38
\7th|GWS|66.13
\8th|NTH|65.88
\9th|RIC|65.38
\ 10th | SYD | 64.13
\11th|GEE|64.00
\12th|ESS|63.75
\13th|STK|63.13
\14th|WBD|60.50
\15th|BRL|60.00
\16th|ADE|59.75
\17th|WCE|58.38
\ 18th | FRE | 54.13
\ Mean | Mean | 64.41
Table 8: Opp Uncontested Marks
\1st|MEL|65.63
\2nd|PTA|72.13
\3rd|HAW|72.88
\4th|ADE|74.75
\5th|GEE|75.38
\6th|RIC|76.13
\7th|CAR|76.50
\ 8th | SYD | 78.00
\9th|NTH|78.75
\10th|GCS|79.50
\11th|GWS|80.63
\12th|WCE|80.88
\13th|WBD|81.13
\14th|COL|83.00
\15th|ESS|85.13
\16th|STK|86.50
\17th|BRL|89.50
\ 18th | FRE | 91.50
\ Mean | Mean | 79.33
Table 9: Score / Inside 50 (%)
\1st|RIC|49.15%
\2nd|ADE|47.75%
\3rd|WCE|47.11%
\4th|ESS|47.03%
\5th|GEE|46.86%
\6th|GWS|46.76%
\7th|MEL|45.47%
\8th|PTA|45.28%
\9th|NTH|44.50%
\ 10th | SYD | 44.25%
\11th|WBD|43.71%
\12th|HAW|42.70%
\13th|COL|42.30%
\14th|BRL|41.39%
\15th|STK|41.32%
\ 16th | FRE | 41.13%
\17th|GCS|39.41%
\18th|CAR|38.97%
\ Mean | Mean | 44.17%
Table 10: Goal / Inside 50 (%)
\1st|ADE|27.19%
\2nd|WCE|26.00%
\3rd|RIC|25.00%
\4th|GEE|24.88%
\5th|PTA|24.46%
\ 6th | SYD | 24.45%
\7th|HAW|24.34%
\8th|ESS|24.03%
\9th|NTH|23.25%
\10th|COL|23.22%
\11th|MEL|23.05%
\12th|BRL|21.85%
\13th|GWS|21.34%
\ 14th | FRE | 21.28%
\15th|CAR|20.77%
\16th|GCS|20.20%
\17th|WBD|19.91%
\18th|STK|16.87%
\ Mean | Mean | 22.89%
Table 11: Tackles inside 50
\1st|HAW|12.63
\2nd|RIC|12.00
\3rd|GCS|11.75
\4th|MEL|11.25
\5th|WCE|11.13
\6th|ADE|10.88
\7th|WBD|10.38
\8th|COL|10.25
\9th|ESS|10.13
\ 10th | SYD | 10.00
\11th|PTA|9.63
\12th|GWS|9.63
\13th|CAR|9.50
\14th|GEE|9.38
\15th|STK|8.88
\16th|BRL|8.38
\17th|NTH|8.13
\ 18th | FRE | 7.63
\ Mean | Mean | 10.09
Table 12: 1-on-1 Defensive Contests Lost (%)
\1st|GWS|21.97%
\2nd|COL|23.91%
\3rd|ADE|24.19%
\4th|MEL|26.67%
\5th|HAW|27.59%
\6th|NTH|28.32%
\7th|RIC|28.38%
\ 8th | SYD | 28.78%
\9th|WCE|28.78%
\10th|STK|30.40%
\11th|GEE|30.52%
\12th|CAR|31.01%
\13th|BRL|31.07%
\14th|ESS|32.89%
\ 15th | FRE | 33.06%
\16th|WBD|33.61%
\17th|PTA|34.53%
\18th|GCS|34.75%
\ Mean | Mean | 29.47%
Table 13: Individual 1-on-1 defensive contests loss (%) (min 5 contests)
\ 1st | Nathan WILSON (FRE) | 6 | 5 | 83.33%
\2nd|Jayden SHORT (RIC)|6|4|66.67%
\eq 3rd|Blake ACRES (STK)|5|3|60.00%
\eq 3rd|Darcy BYRNE-JONES (PTA)|5|3|60.00%
\eq 3rd|Matt EAGLES (BRL)|5|3|60.00%
\eq 3rd|Jack MARTIN (GCS)|5|3|60.00%
\eq 3rd|Josh WAGNER (MEL)|5|3|60.00%
\ 8th | Callum MILLS (SYD) | 14 | 8 | 57.14%
\9th|Jackson NELSON (WCE)|9|5|55.56%
\10th|Jack HENRY (GEE)|15|8|53.33%
\11th|Neville JETTA (MEL)|17|9|52.94%
\eq 12th|Lachie PLOWMAN (CAR)|18|9|50.00%
\ eq 12th | Luke RYAN (FRE) | 12 | 6 | 50.00%
\eq 12th|Dan HOUSTON (PTA)|10|5|50.00%
\eq 12th|Tom LANGDON (COL)|10|5|50.00%
\ eq 12th | Nick SMITH (SYD) | 10 | 5 | 50.00%
\eq 12th|Ryan BURTON (HAW)|8|4|50.00%
\eq 12th|Jacob ALLISON (BRL)|6|3|50.00%
\eq 12th|Kaiden BRAND (HAW)|6|3|50.00%
\eq 12th|Hamish HARTLETT (PTA)|6|3|50.00%
\eq 12th|Jack NEWNES (STK)|6|3|50.00%
\eq 12th|Zach TUOHY (GEE)|6|3|50.00%
\ eq 12th | Stephen HILL (FRE) | 6 | 3 | 50.00%
Similar threads
