- Thread starter
- Banned
- #1,001
The wonderful world of that Maverick Mike Ashley.
I'm sure some people can justify this.....
Yes.
I personally love the name.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The wonderful world of that Maverick Mike Ashley.
I'm sure some people can justify this.....
Llambias claims that this "branding" is designed to be an extension of the current Gallowgate End roof advert and will appear elsewhere round SJP as a "showcase" to prospective sponsors for the 2010/11 season.
If the Dons were short of change (obviously not but hypothetically speaking) how would fans react to a rename of Windy Hill?
People call West 'am's ground 'Upton Park' although it's actually officially called the Boleyn Ground. Upton Park is the name of the locality.
I agree the stadium name is egregious but I can't see it catching on.
Yep.
I mean really, are sky going to say:
'and we go to sportsdirect.com@St. James Park where Newcastle are currently in action'.
Very much doubt it.
They will if Newcastle have any intent of enforcing it. And Sky being Sky they'll probably make a big deal of it.
Well, considering the reasoning is to 'show other potential sponsors' what it would look like, I'm not sure how strict we'll be on it.
It doesn't matter what they call it anyway, it's still St. James' Park.
If everyone calls it St James Park there is not a lot of value for potential sponsors. So I'd say Newcastle will be pretty strict with it.
On the terraces it will remain the same, but the press will largely fall into line.
Not quite sure many sponsors would be interested after what's going to happen on Saturday anyway.
So Alan Smith IS going to score?
Now 6 point gap over 3rd and the next two games are Preston and Swansea, two mid table teams we must show we are better than.
I'll pass, thanks.
FC, I'm not sure how much you would know about the "takeover" but I will ask anyway. Do you know what proportion of the funds will need to be made up by "fans"? I have been reading that there are backers of the NUST but I don't think their pockets are that deep.
Also, what would happened if the club needed funds for transfers. Would every shareholder need to contribute extra money into the club?
I just can't see this being a good idea.