Remove this Banner Ad

The umpire got it wrong

  • Thread starter Thread starter DRDGroup
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Yeah, and if we had've got some free kicks go our way at times earlier in the game we would have won by more. It works both ways.

There are bad decisions in every single game, every single weekend against every single team. The one that people always remember is the one at the end of the game when it is in the balance, not the one when Geelong is say, 20 points up, and a bad free against them stops the run on from being bigger.

I have no problem with you complaining about the non free kick, it was a bad decision, but there would have been bad ones earlier in the game, to both teams, that would have had just as much impact on the game as that one.

i defintely see what you are saying, but geishen has ahd to publicly apologise to freo twice now...... it always seems to be us copping it at critical times and being on the wrong end, thats why we are upset. yes there are bad decisions both ways throughout the game, if we were in the opposite position and you were the ones losing and having that happen, you would be upset also
 
i defintely see what you are saying, but geishen has ahd to publicly apologise to freo twice now...... it always seems to be us copping it at critical times and being on the wrong end, thats why we are upset. yes there are bad decisions both ways throughout the game, if we were in the opposite position and you were the ones losing and having that happen, you would be upset also

*stands up and applauds*
 
i defintely see what you are saying, but geishen has ahd to publicly apologise to freo twice now...... it always seems to be us copping it at critical times and being on the wrong end, thats why we are upset. yes there are bad decisions both ways throughout the game, if we were in the opposite position and you were the ones losing and having that happen, you would be upset also

Geischen apologises nearly every week to the team that lost in a close one because that's when the most noise is made about decisions.

The main reason he says something is because a journalist will ask him 'was that decision wrong' and he has no choice but to say 'yes, it was and we apologise'. No journalist will ask him about the bad decisions throughout the game, only the final one that sticks in the mind.

And yes, I would be upset, but I wouldn't say it cost us the game like some are.
 
Geischen apologises nearly every week to the team that lost in a close one because that's when the most noise is made about decisions.

The main reason he says something is because a journalist will ask him 'was that decision wrong' and he has no choice but to say 'yes, it was and we apologise'. No journalist will ask him about the bad decisions throughout the game, only the final one that sticks in the mind.

And yes, I would be upset, but I wouldn't say it cost us the game like some are.
Shitie,were have you been ,I see you reverted back to muppet town,and by the way Solly says Hi:eek:
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Shitie,were have you been ,I see you reverted back to muppet town,and by the way Solly says Hi:eek:

I have no idea who you are and I don't care. But in short I'm supporting your right to have a sook about a decision, but that one decision didn't decide the game like so many people are saying.
 
I have no idea who you are and I don't care. But in short I'm supporting your right to have a sook about a decision, but that one decision didn't decide the game like so many people are saying.

Yea Shitie...long time no see!..how are things? Do you want us to come over one night and throttle u again?
 
Yea Shitie...long time no see!..how are things? Do you want us to come over one night and throttle u again?

As I said, I have no idea what you're talking about, but I'm supporting your right to complain, just not the thoughts that it cost you the game.

Okay sweet cheeks?
 
Yeah, and if we had've got some free kicks go our way at times earlier in the game we would have won by more. It works both ways.

Watch a replay of the game, spot 6 decisions that went against you, and post the details on here.

You won't be able to, because there weren't 6.

So far, having only reviewed to 3/4 time, I've spotted 8 that went against Freo in the first half, and 3 more in the third quarter. 3 of the first half ones went to Diving Tossbag Soccer Player Fall down Thespian Johnson. Truly indicative of the carp gamesmanship your team engages in. Which is weird, cause if they just played footy and didn't act like sooky lal las they'd win easy.

There are bad decisions in every single game, every single weekend against every single team.

Bullshit. Look at the stats - every year certain teams are favoured over others. From 2003-2006, you guys were on the losing end, now (since 2007) you are untouchable. To suggest every game is fair to both teams is just idiotic garbage, as any look at the official FA/FF stats will show.

And by the way, the Pav free was a free - Taylor made not the slightest effort to even look at the ball as it approached the contest - and that is a free every single time. Appreciate the sense of outrage you handbaggers feel though, as of course nothing like that is ever supposed to go against you, the greatest, purest team on Earth.

The one that people always remember is the one at the end of the game when it is in the balance, not the one when Geelong is say, 20 points up, and a bad free against them stops the run on from being bigger.

Bulldust. People remember the frees that are either drawn by garbage acting from players (say hello tossbag diver Johnson and sookboy Ablett), or not awarded for things that would see a free paid to any other team in the comp. For the last two and a half years, your team has been the greatest actors, and the most protected species. Enjoy it while it lasts, 'cause soon you'll be back with the rest of us - and then you'll find out what it is like to not be a protected species.

I have no problem with you complaining about the non free kick, it was a bad decision, but there would have been bad ones earlier in the game, to both teams, that would have had just as much impact on the game as that one.

Show me more than four that went against you in the whole game. Go on, time, incident and consequence.

Geischen apologises nearly every week to the team that lost in a close one because that's when the most noise is made about decisions.

Garbage. Show me more than 4 comments of apology he's made all year. He's only made three in the regular season, and two of those have been to Freo. Fella, just do a google search and check your facts before you post rubbish.

The main reason he says something is because a journalist will ask him 'was that decision wrong' and he has no choice but to say 'yes, it was and we apologise'. No journalist will ask him about the bad decisions throughout the game, only the final one that sticks in the mind.
And yes, I would be upset, but I wouldn't say it cost us the game like some are.

Rubbish - he gets requests for interviews every week, and declines them almost all the time - the only time he is shamed into vomiting out an 'apology' is when his minions trot out such indefensible garbage that he would look like an even more useless tool if he didn't admit there was an error. As I said above, this has only happened 3 times in 12 rounds, and 2 of those have been for apologies to Freo.

He was a failure and a hack as a player, and completely useless as a coach, and the sooner he is punted as an umpiring official the better. We can then finally move forward to an open, transparent and logical system, where umpires are immediately dropped when they make mistakes, publicly rewarded and recognised for great games, paid as true professionals all year round, provided with genuine lifetime career support and medical cover, including after retirement, protected from corporate influence, and allowed to umpire against the same set of rules for at least 6 or 7 seasons before rule changes are made.
 
Watch a replay of the game, spot 6 decisions that went against you, and post the details on here.

You won't be able to, because there weren't 6.

So far, having only reviewed to 3/4 time, I've spotted 8 that went against Freo in the first half, and 3 more in the third quarter. 3 of the first half ones went to Diving Tossbag Soccer Player Fall down Thespian Johnson. Truly indicative of the carp gamesmanship your team engages in. Which is weird, cause if they just played footy and didn't act like sooky lal las they'd win easy.



Bullshit. Look at the stats - every year certain teams are favoured over others. From 2003-2006, you guys were on the losing end, now (since 2007) you are untouchable. To suggest every game is fair to both teams is just idiotic garbage, as any look at the official FA/FF stats will show.

And by the way, the Pav free was a free - Taylor made not the slightest effort to even look at the ball as it approached the contest - and that is a free every single time. Appreciate the sense of outrage you handbaggers feel though, as of course nothing like that is ever supposed to go against you, the greatest, purest team on Earth.



Bulldust. People remember the frees that are either drawn by garbage acting from players (say hello tossbag diver Johnson and sookboy Ablett), or not awarded for things that would see a free paid to any other team in the comp. For the last two and a half years, your team has been the greatest actors, and the most protected species. Enjoy it while it lasts, 'cause soon you'll be back with the rest of us - and then you'll find out what it is like to not be a protected species.



Show me more than four that went against you in the whole game. Go on, time, incident and consequence.



Garbage. Show me more than 4 comments of apology he's made all year. He's only made three in the regular season, and two of those have been to Freo. Fella, just do a google search and check your facts before you post rubbish.



Rubbish - he gets requests for interviews every week, and declines them almost all the time - the only time he is shamed into vomiting out an 'apology' is when his minions trot out such indefensible garbage that he would look like an even more useless tool if he didn't admit there was an error. As I said above, this has only happened 3 times in 12 rounds, and 2 of those have been for apologies to Freo.

He was a failure and a hack as a player, and completely useless as a coach, and the sooner he is punted as an umpiring official the better. We can then finally move forward to an open, transparent and logical system, where umpires are immediately dropped when they make mistakes, publicly rewarded and recognised for great games, paid as true professionals all year round, provided with genuine lifetime career support and medical cover, including after retirement, protected from corporate influence, and allowed to umpire against the same set of rules for at least 6 or 7 seasons before rule changes are made.


:thumbsu:
 
So far, having only reviewed to 3/4 time, I've spotted 8 that went against Freo in the first half, and 3 more in the third quarter. 3 of the first half ones went to Diving Tossbag Soccer Player Fall down Thespian Johnson.

Look at the stats - every year certain teams are favoured over others. From 2003-2006, you guys were on the losing end, now (since 2007) you are untouchable. To suggest every game is fair to both teams is just idiotic garbage, as any look at the official FA/FF stats will show.

Bulldust. People remember the frees that are either drawn by garbage acting from players (say hello tossbag diver Johnson and sookboy Ablett),

1. That's because you're a Fremantle supporter that can't see past your own team, highlighted by the fact you resort to childish name calling when describing two of the best players in the competition.

2. We didn't get free kicks in 2003-2006 because we were never first to the ball. Now with a bit of fitness and body strength, we do, hence we get free kicks. When Freo starts doing the same thing instead of using sniping tactics you might get some frees too. Your older players could learn a lot from your young players who do exactly that.

Lots of naughty things that have got me banned
 

Remove this Banner Ad

1. That's because you're a Fremantle supporter that can't see past your own team, highlighted by the fact you resort to childish name calling when describing two of the best players in the competition.

2. We didn't get free kicks in 2003-2006 because we were never first to the ball. Now with a bit of fitness and body strength, we do, hence we get free kicks. When Freo starts doing the same thing instead of using sniping tactics you might get some frees too. Your older players could learn a lot from your young players who do exactly that.

3. Back to the name calling. Your purple tinted glasses need to be taken off. You follow a joke of a club that's not tough enough to get the ball in the packs and therefore gives away free kicks. Then the mob in the outer cry foul because they're precious little boys don't get a free kick.

I never resort to this kind of stuff, but, pathetic club, pathetic supporters and I'll be glad if I never have to watch your mob of pathetic footballers again.

Easy solution. If you don't want to watch our mob, then don't. It's not rocket science. If you don't want to read what people have to say on the "Freo" board, then bugger off back to the Geelong board.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom