POGMA
Club Legend
- Apr 30, 2014
- 1,178
- 244
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #51
How would you know what can or can't be done wrt robotics and mechanization within a zeitgeist framework?...in our current monetary reward system, people have to earn money so they'll limit what they give away as it's worth money, but with NO MONEY and very little need to work, the incentive changes from money to other factors like fun, tinkering, intellectual challenge, and don't pretend people like that don't exist and don't pretend intelligence can sit idle.
As for the efficiency of machines etc, of course part of that's due to the state of our knowledge, but also due to the fact that we cannot build ULTIMATE systems as they cost too much compared to other functional systems that require software and hardware support, not that I'm suggesting there won't be SW/HW problems, but the frequency of maintenance should DECREASE as CPU/HW/SW increase in power and efficiency.
As for companies not caring about creating longterm unemployment, they will when the crime rate skyrockets, and as for previous mechanization, that was when we had plenty of resources and far fewer people....3 billion in the late 60's, approx 7 billion now, and more to come, all within the context of INCREASING consumption on a finite and fragile biosphere, nup, it simply CAN'T happen and you know it can't.
re-communism, wrong again, you'll have as many creative options as we have the resources to build, so whilst a default design might exist and be a quick and easy way to build any device, you'll also be able to heavily customize probably every product, the machines don't care whether you like red or blue, they build according to the specs YOU provide.
Communism, LOL, was it based on a Natural Law Resource Based Economy?....we both know it wasn't, as such, scientific efficiency will ENSURE we can build as much as we "need" and many other things we want, however, consumption must decrease and will decrease when people are faced with global ecological threats in the form of man made climate change, pests and infestations and various plagues and supabugs, all of which have been predicted, yet people like you are either willfully ignorant or just don't care and are happy to criticize that which you know very little about.
As for the efficiency of machines etc, of course part of that's due to the state of our knowledge, but also due to the fact that we cannot build ULTIMATE systems as they cost too much compared to other functional systems that require software and hardware support, not that I'm suggesting there won't be SW/HW problems, but the frequency of maintenance should DECREASE as CPU/HW/SW increase in power and efficiency.
As for companies not caring about creating longterm unemployment, they will when the crime rate skyrockets, and as for previous mechanization, that was when we had plenty of resources and far fewer people....3 billion in the late 60's, approx 7 billion now, and more to come, all within the context of INCREASING consumption on a finite and fragile biosphere, nup, it simply CAN'T happen and you know it can't.
re-communism, wrong again, you'll have as many creative options as we have the resources to build, so whilst a default design might exist and be a quick and easy way to build any device, you'll also be able to heavily customize probably every product, the machines don't care whether you like red or blue, they build according to the specs YOU provide.
Communism, LOL, was it based on a Natural Law Resource Based Economy?....we both know it wasn't, as such, scientific efficiency will ENSURE we can build as much as we "need" and many other things we want, however, consumption must decrease and will decrease when people are faced with global ecological threats in the form of man made climate change, pests and infestations and various plagues and supabugs, all of which have been predicted, yet people like you are either willfully ignorant or just don't care and are happy to criticize that which you know very little about.