- Joined
- Apr 7, 2004
- Posts
- 22,475
- Reaction score
- 12,020
- Location
- Pluto
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- TOO
- Banned
- #26
I agree with most of what you are saying Cogga, especially pushing Richo back, it was a mistake not to do so and he may have been able to plug a couple of holes but that does not change the fact that the biggest change was in the intensity of the Cats.
As a team our guys are still learning and growing, and I don't think that they had another level to go too when the Cats lifted in the thrid quarter.
They monstered us and we didnt have the physical precence to go with them.
Lets not forget other than Selwood and Hawkins, most of their team is mid 20s upwards.
Like I said in my last post this is not a defence of how we played , more a recognition of how well the Cats played in the third quarter. They had another level to go too and watching the first half we threw everything at them and only lead by 6 points.
We did not have any more in our bag of tricks but in time with bigger bodies and more experience this should become part of this groups armoury within 2-3 years.
yep...understand what you saying re. cats intensity, it was quite evident that they upped the ante, it was quite visible, when they had numbers wherever the ball was. But strategies need to change when blind freddy can see that a team is making its push...IMO anyway. The brains trust should have realised that whatever their plan was, i.e. move Richo here, put x, y , z there, should have changed, in the face of the surge, in an attempt to weather it. Maybe snag a couple on the rebound, and maybe snuff out the surge. Like i said, when you are 5 up in the rain, you can soak up the pressure and preserve the lead. Its all about keeping your nose in front. Any relenting of that surge, and you strike and kill it off. Of course you might say that the cats are unrelenting, but they were that because they could see they were reeling us in quick. You stem the tide and buy time and you never know. For sure and certain that in the heat of battle when they had drawn up to us....and this isnt a bag for Polak, the guy cant kick, but he presented us with the opportunity, but he snags that goal and we keep a buffer and maybe deflate them a bit. He misses and whhhhhhhhhhhooooooooooosh...bye bye charlie.
TW must have been saying you little ____ing beauty when before you knew it, we were 5 kicks up. But he dropped the ball, when he stuck to the pre game plan. I reckon he has pencilled it in for future reference to. And it this aint a bag of TW either. The fact that the plan got us to be 5 up, means that he had it right at that point. But when its wet and the ball is sliding around off packs etc, the structure shit that they keep on talking about means JS, IMO. You need to improvise and get the RESULT.
But then again when the umps are paying ridiculous deliberate OOBs, because the commision agents have poured on the cash for the 5% interest, it makes life difficult











