Tom Boyd

[Sweet Jesus]

Sweet Jesus - Did Tom Boyd piss in your cereal?

Presumably that would cost extra.

As a bulldogs fan this thread is absolutely hilarious and brilliant

I'm glad you like it.

Dogs fans barely care about his salary now & this will continue to be a thread for lemmings to keep taking shots at him.

Dogs fans care enough to insist he hasn't been overpaid when he clearly has.

Plus, you talk a bit of s**t, many Dogs fans will admit the contract is a bit excessive but that's what it took with a calculated risk. That paid off very handsomely & made it worth it.

So you concede he has been overpaid to date.

 

[Sweet Jesus]

When will you realise the obvious point that he wasn't given this contract based on what he'd do as a 20 year old??

I'd happily concede that.

But it doesn't mean he hasn't been overpaid to date.

 

[Senor Ed]

Mate we get that he's been overpaid....but do we care? Hell no

 

[Sweet Jesus]

People have to realise that we don't care if hes overpaid for the following reasons:
- He's a marque signing for the Dogs - marketing tick
- He is a KPF who is 21 years old with a lot of scope for improvement - list management tick
- No other player has been has been forced out by his contract; in fact we still didnt pay 100% of the cap this year because of our list profile
- We just won the mother ******* flag with him delivering on the big stage

So you concede he has been overpaid to date.

Mate we get that he's been overpaid....but do we care? Hell no

Many don't.

 

[ossie_21]

So you concede he has been overpaid to date.

Yes, many supporters have. As I mentioned. Why you make this an issue, nobody will ever know.


"So, you admit it then!"

"Yes"

"Well, that will show them!"

"Right..........."

That's how stupid your argument is.

 

[Senor Ed]

TBH the whole West Coast list is overpaid.... You guys would be paying 100% of the cap and yet finished 7th...

You are paying more for your list of 44 than we are and you didn't achieve anything...

 

[Sweet Jesus]

Yes, many supporters have.

Many don't.

As I mentioned. Why you make this an issue, nobody will ever know.

Because some Dogs fans deny the obvious for reasons that are unclear.

"So, you admit it then!"

"Yes"

"Well, that will show them!"

"Right..........."

That's how stupid your argument is.

But that is not my argument.

 

[Sweet Jesus]

TBH the whole West Coast list is overpaid.... You guys would be paying 100% of the cap and yet finished 7th...

You are paying more for your list of 44 than we are and you didn't achieve anything...

Is this your counterargument?

It's cool. You already conceded my point.

 

[Senor Ed]

Is this your counterargument?

Do you admit it?

 

[ossie_21]

Many don't.

Your problem with that is...what? Does it stop you sleeping at night?

Because some Dogs fans deny the obvious for reasons that are unclear.

Is it some, or is it many? Can't have it both ways

But that is not my argument.

I'll take your word for it

 

[Sweet Jesus]

Your problem with that is...what? Does it stop you sleeping at night?

I'm inclined to point out obvious realities when people deny them.

Is it some, or is it many? Can't have it both ways

There's no contradiction.

 

[Sweet Jesus]

Do you admit it?

No.

 

[Senor Ed]

No.

But its obvious. I don't understand how some WCE supporters deny this.

If you are paying your list more than the premiership winning team, you are logically not getting return on investment.

 

[Sweet Jesus]

But its obvious. I don't understand how some WCE supporters deny this.

Give me a list of West Coast players' salaries and I'll be happy to tell you which players I believe are overpaid.

 

[Senor Ed]

I am actually quite concerned at how much WCE are paying their players. They are obviously overpaid and it staggers me how some WCE supporters don't see this

 

[Doggies1972]

I am actually quite concerned at how much WCE are paying their players. They are obviously overpaid and it staggers me how some WCE supporters don't see this

Well for a start. If Darling is on more than a rookies wage he is getting way over. Nic nats efforts in Gf's suggest much the same. Theres two to start with. But they probably polled well in b&f points so that will justify overpaying apparently.

 

[Sweet Jesus]

Well for a start. If Darling is on more than a rookies wage he is getting way over. Nic nats efforts in Gf's suggest much the same. Theres two to start with. But they probably polled well in b&f points so that will justify overpaying apparently.

As I said, give me a list of West Coast players' salaries and I'll be happy to tell you which players I believe are overpaid.

That is a rational response. You should give it a try vis-a-vis Boyd's disproportionately high salary.

 

[Doggies1972]

As I said, give me a list of West Coast players' salaries and I'll be happy to tell you which players I believe are overpaid.

That is a rational response. You should give it a try vis-a-vis Boyd's disproportionately high salary.

As i said darling...if he is on anything more than a rookie... and nic nat was on a mill last year for his gf snooze.
Frankly i couldnt give a rats what any west coast player earns....but from a regular failing point of view you could argue they all are regardless what they are on. More just pointing out the stupidity and obession with with your repetitive dribble.

 

[TiAn_]

As I said, give me a list of West Coast players' salaries and I'll be happy to tell you which players I believe are overpaid.

That is a rational response. You should give it a try vis-a-vis Boyd's disproportionately high salary.

You're waging a campaign of irrationality.

Stop trolling yourself.

 

[Sweet Jesus]

As i said darling...if he is on anything more than a rookie... and nic nat was on a mill last year for his gf snooze.

How much is Darling being paid?

Frankly i couldnt give a rats what any west coast player earns.

Yeah, it strikes me more as a convenient pivot away from your losing argument about Boyd not being overpaid.

but from a regular failing point of view you could argue they all are regardless what they are on.

That makes no sense. They can't be "overpaid regardless of what they are on". If you think someone is overpaid, you must, by definition, take their salary into account. That's the whole basis for saying they're overpaid.

So, as I said, if you give me a list of West Coast players' salaries, I will be happy to tell you who I believe is overpaid. Because unlike you, I don't just reflexively and witlessly insist "nah, not overpaid" regardless of the facts.

More just pointing out the stupidity and obession with with your repetitive dribble.

Except you failed to do that. You've not make any coherent argument at all.

 

[Sweet Jesus]

You're waging a campaign of irrationality.

Which part of my argument is irrational?

 

[StringyDog]

As I said, give me a list of West Coast players' salaries and I'll be happy to tell you which players I believe are overpaid.

That is a rational response. You should give it a try vis-a-vis Boyd's disproportionately high salary.

You dont need a list they are all overpaid given they only turn up to play home games and give away games and finals a miss, paying 100% of cap for half a season of games

 

[Sweet Jesus]

You dont need a list they are all overpaid given they only turn up to play home games and give away games and finals a miss, paying 100% of cap for half a season of games

I see. This is the new intelligent response to the obvious fact that Boyd has been overpaid to date. Simply claiming that every WC player is overpaid, without even specifying their salaries.

For the record, I have no doubt that some WC players are indeed overpaid. But how does this alter the discussion about Boyd? Or has that losing argument been abandoned?

 

[TiAn_]

Which part of my argument is irrational?

The premise.

 

[Pannalstaroz]

He's been overpaid for output. Dogs fans embrace the overpayment.

Good talk.